MRAs Are Posers | by Jessie Nagy

female mind

An internet report featured a woman basically asking why her date wasn’t a mind reader: She rejected him & wondered why he didn’t try harder.
Let this be a reminder of how female collectivism weeds out (or attempts to keep temporarily) all the good qualities of masculinity – skilled imparting, which is a main merit of science, etc. – for the sake of making the rest of society yield to her rudeness, etc..

Men & women are not equal, nor should they be treated equally. We don’t even really speak the same. If Females are equal to males, why do they have mood disorders attributed to their period cycles? Men get moody sometimes, but much differently than that. & the men who are more moody is often what whores choose because of the impulse associated with female collectivism.
Men’s rights activists – posers – will claim that I’m “just like a feminist” when I seriously criticize how whores waste time of males & ruin lives. Last time I checked, it was men’s rights activists who believed to such stupid things as equality. Maybe you are equal to dumb whores that you maintain female collectivism, & worship these lame, unimpressive female men’s rights activists. Last time I checked, it was men’s rights activists & the like who emphasize mostly current events, politics, etc., rather than harder science, which is the same level as feminists. Last time I checked, it was men’s rights activists & the like who stated: “you can’t hit a woman: It will make the movement look bad” – just like the feminists. Last time I checked, it was men’s rights activists & related who slandered science that women are inferior to men as “pseudoscience.” Of course, this was not slander documented of a conventional way because it often happens in spaces where things get lost in a shuffle, so there isn’t always a way to prove it.
I think that pick-up-artists are also adhering, although not conscious of it, hence female collectivism, to equality as well because they are one of the first to make such a stupid claim that people like myself are “making excuses for my existence.” This comes from some illogical notion of equality: That I’m “like them” – feeble/emasculated (& that, for the supposed non-existent “shy personality,” I just got a little lagged behind somehow.) Sarcasm, Yeah, I’m like you. It’s their inability to understand that obligations doesn’t always exist with the whore consensus.

A direct quote from a main pick-up-artist: Roosh V:

“I was so turned on by her beauty & petite figure that I told myself she’s not walking out my door without getting fucked. At that moment I accepted getting locked up in Polish prison to make it happen.”

Reducing the feminist fake “rape culture” critiques, this is female collectivism – on the verge, or almost on the verge, of having one’s life ruined or burdened some way for the totally false validation of “dominant” or “criminal” (which can be the other “dominant”).
Roosh V knows the tactics enough to know that acting by “impulse,” for a lack of a better word, is mostly how the game works. Rather than reporting on these whores for their disgusting ordination, he has carefully cultivated schemes to betray masculinity.

We don’t want your fucking dumb tests, you dumb whores.
This kind of tactic employment is responsible for things like “Me-too.” We don’t want to jeopardize our lives, etc., by some vague implications, only to be either “creepy” or a “winner” because whores don’t respect masculinity.
&, yet, we have idiots like Jordan Peterson Crusading against postmodernism without even realizing that the whores he defends for testing is very much responsible for postmodernism, etc., because it’s male performance for them.

That’s just one case of language perversion/inconsistency. Of course, there’s going to be whores emphasizing: “I’m not like that.” They might not be exactly like that, but they have many other problems they’ll create. Don’t give them many rights.



Woman Asks Why A Guy She Turned Down Didn’t Try Harder, Gets The Perfect Response by​ Rokas L – boredpanda-dot-com

PUA’s, what in the actual fuck? by BARBAROSSAA – sheddingoftheego-dot-com


Book Report: ‘The Munchausen Complex – Socialization of Violence & Abuse’ | by J.N.

book review of the munchausen

Socialization of violence & abuse is a subject I am obsessed with addressing.

Dr. Richard L. Matteoli provides, formatted with a “dry” mini-encyclopdic way, valubale information. Not just a book on circumcision. It reports on other topics, such as different types of rituals: Many long for a sort of spiritual experience: With the influence of dance, music, intoxicants, even horror, the mind short-circuits with some various adrenaline rushes. They are in a state of cognitive dissonance with their failed attempts.
What is the relevance that it is “dry?” Because it answers how nearly no one would stop to think about how routine circumcision is wrong. They need to get a life.
I have yet to see a woman provide original content to the same frequency regarding m.g.m.’s true effects. The reason that is is because Women obviously don’t care & are looking elsewhere – to feral/primitive/synthetic masculinity.

Circumcision is a repetition compulsion.

Firstly, it should be acknowledged that it is an anti-cultural programming book: Their society is not my society.

Women love men that dominate & even instill fear in others.
Fear conditioning creates avoidance.
Women prepare male arbiters for other males to succumb to.

NPA is defined by psychiatry as: N = narcissism, P = perfectionism/unrealistic desires/entitlement, A = aggression. Women have proxy aggression. NPA is a generic state of women.

In early 15th century Spain, Flagellation was religiously encouraged. Male genital mutilation is now the irrational procedure religiously adhering to “science.” Some will get piercings, brands, tattoos, especially to compensate for a lack of real merit, to get attention from the irrational collective, attempting to thrive by what other poeple applaud back after the projected image to others.

Collective Munchausen syndrome for profit involves abuse for motives of power, employment security, etc.. Trivializing of other males has been for the purpose of making whores happy to maintain some sort of enterprise. When a feminist, etc., wants to complain about “objectification,” there is real abuse happening because women don’t even care that the power of men that women want turns into brutality.

Theological studies, etc., has a repulsive effect to modern contexts of mathematics & methodologies of “cubicles.”

The female yearning for power has constructed power & authority of ritual by instinct. During this process, schemes become instinctive automatisms. Shifting power relationships among symbols becomes implicit. Culture uses ritual to control by means of assumptions about the way things should be.

Alternatives to dissenters of ritual: Defensive resistance: He’ll be accused of being anti-social: Asocial self exclusion: He’ll be diagnosed with Schizoid Personality Disorder.

Some reports state children lose interest with sucking breasts after cutting.

Babies are much more sensitive than adults: Their spinal nerves are more excitable, their nociceptive nerve ending density is more concentrated, & there is greater nerve overlap in the skin.

Newborns acquire (subconscious) memory by association, habituation, conditioning, etc..

When traumatized, neurohormones are secreted & affect imprinting. A ruined balance of mental evaluation occurs. When the previously traumatized adult meets stress, reaction, with distorted connection, can be re-triggered.

Cut adult males are reported to be more rigid in the pelvis.

It is harder for a female to separate from an uncircumcised male.

Male genital mutilation changes the brain. It has been postulated to cause cell fragmentation & phagocytosis in many zones of the developing brain.

The corpus callosum is smaller in abused children. This causes less integration of the two halves of the brain, resulting with dramatic shifts of mood & personality.

Circumcision causes domination, for a lack of a better word, towards women. It is a diminished maleness with sexual callousness & decreased tenderness. A territorial machismo ensues with indifference & interpreting threats.

Erections are very much due to testosterone for young males. Erections depend more on sensations for adult males. Since MGM (male genital mutilation) decreases sensation, there is more demand for erection drugs.

Psychotic disorders involve instincts of survival & even possibly the question of annihilation. Not always, but it is common that women are drawn to those with psychopathic tendencies & that those men become psychopaths because of the external force of femininity propelling them that way. Domination of others is for the purpose of preserving survival instincts for whores.

MGM is a type of emotional blackmail. It forces the child to live in systems of codependency. It transfers power away from the child, regarding bodily integrity, to society.

In Africa, the spread of aids is due not to over-sexing. It’s due to bad practices, such as dry-sex. They actually put harsh objects in womens’ vaginas to make dry a wet vagina because wet vaginas are considered unappealing in Africa.

MGM creates cultural post-traumatic attachment that causes cultural repetition compulsion.

Circumcision originated from the pagan world – very primitive. Circumcision is a product of comixio religionis. It later infiltrated Christianity.

There is a danger of deifying parental figures. It can be used to justify bad power, bad control & social pathology for a group’s own sake – dominance. It then enters other societies.

Benjamin Franklin said: If you want to convince, speak of interest, not of reason.
Edward Berneys paid his chauffeur “Dumb Jack” $25.00 dollars a week. He worked from 5:00 AM to 9:00 PM with only a half day to pause every two weeks. E.B. was a master of propaganda & fooling.
I am not a loser. I work in a restaurant. Why does the comedian Eric Andre get thousands upon thousands (possibly millions) for producing nothing of value? Because the gynocentric commandment imposes that. Without my cleaning & organizing of the food-place, the health inspection people will give a bad rating to it, then the whole project is ruined. I am a major part of the foundation.I should be getting paid 50% more with the cost of living reduced. Water is free. Why shouldn’t certain things be cheaper?
Menstruating women are seen as “divine.” Earliest women established sexual morality by periodically repulsing men. This institution of sexual morality is by memes. Menstruation in matriarchal societies is a “blessed” event – glorifying personality disorders.
The system is just “fucked” because of female selection for violence. Violence doesn’t necessarily mean what the first assumption commonly is. Females promote the survival of the fittest. Fittest doesn’t mean skilled though. A reminder I will be reusing with more articles: Many (fictional) men that women are attracted to might have more money, but they’re primitive. Females seek these rarer dominant ones who then demerit others, tc. & use them as opportunities. Feminine greed fosters lunacy.
Sarcasm: Ooh, you joined the NAVY. You’re so “valuable.”

In primitive tribes, the group trumps the individual, & the purpose of ritual is to make all members subservient to the social norm. Tribes are very much maintained by fear.

“The AMA came to dominate medical practice through brute financial force, political manipulation, & professional authority enhanced by rising public favor with “scientific” medicine…..American medicine surged forward as a profit-driven enterprise…. By the time Dr. Morris Fishbein assumed the mantle of Dr. Simmons, who had himself started out as a homeopath, the AMA was at the helm of a strapping new industry flying the allopathic flag…” – Kenny Ausubel/ ‘When Healing Becomes A Crime’

Militarist America often likes to think of others cultures as primitive. Yet the USA is home to the pseudo science of MGM.

Male genital mutilation promotions are subtle & protected by claims of customs & professional expertise, even though it originated from primitive pagan cultures.

Secundum Quid is assumptions by too little evidence: If a woman sees a man looking exhausted, or something, she’ll call it “creepy,” but that man was exhausted because a whore just wasted 4 months of his life.
Secundum quid occurs for arguing for male genital mutilation for urinary tract infection: There’s a slightly higher incidence of UTI with intact males. They make the assumption that because all those boys have a prepuce, the prepuce “must” be the cause. Urine is sterile & the prepuce has immunological functions. The true cause is wrong force with lack of information/education.

STDs is an issue of behavior. AIDS is too common in circumcising America.

Feminists complain about being slut-shamed, which is questionable how often other females do the shaming compared to males, & the reasons females slut-shame being different than the way males do it, yet you find females slut-shaming men frequently – “creepy,” etc.. The men women select ruins male sexuality by the violence of MGM. Males are the rightful heirs of this world by way of construction & abstraction, therefore males should be allowed to be sluts.

Lobby groups often keep true intentions secret. They influence public opinion, government, & corporations.

There’s the argument that education doesn’t work to stop bad sexual practices. What do you think compels people to brush their teeth? Education. MGM is used as deferring the education.

Of the wild, rape is common. Sure, there’s some amount of bartering, etc., with food for sex, etc., but violence & rape is what the wild is about. Humans don’t operate the same way (with only a smaller subset of a rape culture), yet the whole concept of an alpha male comes from the violence & rape culture of the wild.
You’re not an alpha male. You’re a slave/traitors to gynocentrism.

Lamarck has made a much better model than Darwin, which I will be typing of with another article.

Science: Males Are Naturally More Romantic/”Sensitive” | by Jessie Nagy

men are more romantic

Most of man’s process is governed by a single drive: oxytocin. The emotional, psychological health of man depends upon whether he can receive this or whether access to it is blocked – excessive competition.

The body & psyche are obviously interconnected, & emotions influence how you function with work, etc..

With females influencing social interaction, a process of “armoring” of the male occurs of which he appears to be “dominant.” There is a terror that strikes the armored man when he is faced with expressions of different life of others, & this is responsible for the systematic armoring of newborn generations, & it has become organized in many of social institutions, which has resulted in the male tendency, born from fear, for protecting feminine tendencies at almost any price & to hide unpleasant truths, especially due to overpowering by the feminine.
A child who grows relatively free from armor will understand that the society is largely problematic, not he.

Doctors are also human: They also have to create their own fiction.

Of a fighting tournament of which only three winners will be awarded, obviously, there will be “first place”, “second place”, “third place.” That’s a homologue of how females see masculinity, then society uses that same model of mistaking a small portion as the standard. What’s more: society then strives for this unrealistic standard that females want, which causes confusion, etc..

What is MGM? No, I’m not referring to the film production. (Although that also has to stop, which is a different set of chapters.) M.G.M is male genital mutilation.

According to Billy Ray Boyd, author of ‘Circumcision Exposed – Rethinking A Medical & Cultural Tradition,’ a circumcisionist is one who advocates the routine of M.G.M.. a preservationist/sexual preservationist is one opposed to the routine cutting.
Mutilation or even sexual mutilation is much more accurate than the clinical term: circumcision.

We males are originally supposed to teach females romance & sensuality, & a LOT OF it. That’s the true “natural order.” Now females not only own sexuality for the most part, they also misapply sexuality without even knowing what their doing.
Untainted men, & I’m not saying this by a demeaning way, are so sensual that they can have orgasms by just stretching the foreskin back periodically without the typical stroking.

The figure of boys who have experienced M.g.m. is lower than the figure of the 1960s, which was 90%. In the future, M.G.M. will probably be thought as different from the norm, yet, unfortunately, female sexuality, with all its savagery, when men have taken another phase of evolution, will likely yearn for the olden days of “discipline” & clumsy sex, when men were “real men.”

The AAP – American Academy of Pediatrics – claimed that there no valid indications for m.g.m. in the neonatal period, then kept altering it’s idea on M.G.M. during 1989, claiming “The procedure has potential medical benefits & advantages, as well as inherent disadvantages & risks.” Consider “potential” of that context. it translates to not necessary. When the idea was changed slightly, the media did not emphasize serious reports on disadvantages & risks.
If women would be given the chance to report on something as serious as it, unlike the food criticism & hand-bag articles, etc., you’d typically find in a magazine by & for women, you’d get them adhering to the ~5% sociopath apex of men to make a collective statement, dismissing maltreatment of males by M.G.M., bragging about some lame degrees they got, even possibly humoring it.

It’s completely irresponsible to not endorse that parents help boys clean their penises, when many risks of complications, ranging from infection to baby’s different immunity, loss of shaft-skin, convulsions, massive damage to even internal organs, quadriplegia, impotence (no wonder there’s an industry for erectile dysfunction), & even death. Some infant’s entire penises have been entirely lost.

I tried having a conversation once with this “mature” whore taking psychology courses, telling her of the aggravating nature of M.G.M., & the fact that myself being intact, I don’t have that aggressive/numb personality. Her response, which is typical of female herds: “Talking about dicks doesn’t turn me on” – the total narcissistic personality disorder that mandates sociopathy, which only proves the female collectivism, regardless of their acclaimed superior “expertise”, will generally be an idiot. Their idiocy is actually transmitted into the organizations.

When the skin is torn on a molded plastic board called a “circumstraint” with velcro straps, the baby starts to scream, if he doesn’t experience shock. The comatose state is mistaken for a fine sleep. Some babies defecate or vomit (possibly contributing to infection).
Don’t think it’s “just a snip.” The process is actually ~1 week. The first ~5 minutes is the cutting process, after which there are days of abrasion, burning sensation due to urination, which happens more frequently with babies, & a swollen process.

In order to bring attention of the aggravating effects done to the subconscious minds of babies, you’d have to do studies on large groups for over periods of years. This type of study would obviously be absurd. Seriously, just think about it, but, of course, there’s always groups of women ready to claim “How come professors aren’t confirming that m.g.m. is bad or (if they even make further effort, which they wouldn’t) that it produces sadists/careless men, etc.?” But, actually, the author of ‘Circumcision Exposed’ does actually teach at City College of San Francisco. There’s also the DOC – Doctors Opposed to Circumcision. Most women don’t seriously care if something is right or wrong. They just care if it’s popularized. Think about it. Most women mostly care about mainly power.

The foreskin & its proximal zones fosters intimacy between the two partners. It is a smooth type of sexuality – non-clumsy. Don’t you understand? Men are naturally romantic & “sensitive” – the better sex.

Think about it: the skin meant to protect eyes is the same mechanism to protect the glans from rough/thorny underbrush, & the idea of m.g.m. diminishing infection is overdone.

When patients had the ravages of overwork & various abuses of the industrial revolution, attributed to ~5% of the apex that women are trying to get, doctor’s took patient’s medical history, found that they masturbated, then theorized that was the main cause of their pathologies. Never did they theorize that it was stress due to the survival instincts.

A number of doctors believe what they’re doing is “right” – survival collectivism/no time to think. Others admit they’re doing it for the money. Greed comes from survival instincts. Survival instincts stops serious thinking. Survival instincts comes from female collectivism. Remember: Most women’s main concern is power – arbitrary power.
There are financial plans for marketing baby foreskins. It’s a multi-million-dollar-a-year industry.
That’s why the Buddhist purists stated that female sexuality is disgusting: not because they were “timid” or were specifically thinking of something like this article, but because they knew of that relentless force that women like. That power is driven for the feminine.
Some Feminists might claim to want a more patient male, which is doubtfully questionable.
The provider to a whore is usually just a means to flee to a goal. The goal to her is that ~5% of arbitrary masculinity.

“It has been known for decades that circumcision provides no demonstrably medically necessary purpose. It is rooted in our culture, however.” – Blue Cross Blue Shield of Utah

The idea that intact men are more likely to spread AIDS is false. In regions that practice sexual mutilation less, though still a problem, is less epidemic.
The AIDS & pro-m.g.m. scare tactic started in 1996 with circumcisionist Aaron J. Fink. The m.g.m. industry has been trying to find evidence for this since that.
While there are studies suggesting that to not cut would increase contamination, there’s more prominent studies claiming that cut men are actually more likely to to contract & infect.
One suggestion is that a non-cut penis can gently slip in & out. A cut man will cause more friction & micro tears because of abnormal hardening.
Mass m.g.m. has also been suggested to have increased AIDS in the U.S. because of less condom use due to less sensitivity.
Teaching a boy good hygiene & safe sex will serve him much better. It also gives him an obligation to responsibility.

In fact, sexual mutilation is also arguably one useful means to desensitize a boy & socialize him into a culture in which war & other forms of violence are philosophized to be good/necessary.
Whenever you are inundated with news of how a courageous kid had to defend himself against a bully, it’s really just an excuse to watch a fight. What would his status be if he called security, etc.? He would be interpreted as a “pussy,” including by females.
As males, we’re coerced to deny our realistic selves.
We are welcomed into life by having a chunk of our penises cut off. Just let that actually register. If we’re subjected to extreme pain that we have no control over, we learn that life is a struggle, We are then disempowered or coerced to show “strength,” especially to females, & that’s the only reason that babies “get over it:” because their hijacked masculinity is considered the norm with denied information about the REAL effects of sexual mutilation.

Stating this to a female will have them laugh at you or label you “crazy” because female preference for dominant/anti-intellectual men is of use to them.

The basics: The dictionary states:

Anti-intellectual – a person who believes that intellect & reason are less important than actions & emotions in solving problems & understanding reality.

Female sexuality is to be shamed.
The female immature attraction to stupid/reactionary males makes it that the other males are coerced to have that female attraction as an aspirational example to compare themselves to.

In France & England, f.g.m. – female genital mutilation – is illegal. This is hailed, which is good that it’s illegal, yet if males wanted to brag about making it illegal for themselves, it would be ridiculed.
Male pain & loss is trivialized. In fact, especially to females, male loss will cause women to devalue a male even more – multiplied negatives.

The fact that sexual mutilation weakens the faculty of sexual excitement & diminishes the pleasure is indubitable. For if at birth this member has been made to bleed & has had it’s covering removed, it must indubitably be weakened. This is why males seek other wrong forms of satisfaction – “SADOSFACTON,” which becomes the cultural norm.

The foreskin is necessary for comfortable erections.. Even today, many doctors remove so much skin that, when the the penis reaches full size after puberty, erections can be uncomfortable.

The purpose of the prepuce, which maintains much stronger sex drive, is to protect the head of the organ, & to enhance communication with the partner: Men are more sensitive.

The presence of the prepuce anticipates those sexual prompting of young boys before puberty: That anticipation is rarer among cut boys. It is not “moral” to cut that out. The better strategy is education, specifically information, especially how to communicate with future partners sensuality. Cleaning, etc., is to be taught to rely on self will-power, which also teaches them to be reliant on themselves.

What the original foreskin of babies, which protects the glans from various dirt, etc., secretes is mild & even beneficial. It’s only the less common occurrence of excessive secretions that is bad, which can be trained to stop by basic, mature instruction of bathroom customs.

A man, William E. Kruger, aged 30 was persuaded by a doctor to be clipped. This anecdote is specifically scientific because he is capable of making the comparison since it happened to him years after the first days of life. Men who were cut when babies don’t know what their missing. On a letter to newspapers & intact organizations, he printed:

….”Sexual pleasure has been reduced by at least 70%, both in intensity & the fact that the whole rage of sensation is completely gone…. Two of the structures [foreskin & frenulum] were removed, & the only remaining structure, the head, has been toughened & desensitized… It is constantly exposed to the friction of clothing.. It has deprived me, caused physical pain & has been psychologically devastating. I no longer feel like a real man.”

The residual exposed gland mucosa becomes abnormally keratinized. During m.g.m. the frenular artery may also be cut, depriving the anterior urethra of its major blood supply.

Some would say: “But I’ve seen uncut men acting violent in porn.” Just like the deception of the fashion & minute slaps of uncut men with BDSM, that performer is owned by the producer(s). The producer(s) experienced m.g.m. (or were influenced by it). The producers are owned by the ~5% of arbitrary masculinity. Dominance hierarchy is only due to survival instincts. That equation is due to the feminine since women incentivize men to be excessively prepared with survival instincts, & the survival instincts is especially worse in harsher climates .

Females generally need more time to have better pleasure during passion. The uncut male has the capability of spanning/bonding & stopping the female to greedily make alterations. Retrospectively, Kristen O’Hara regarded the mutilated penis as a sort of unreal device that made intercourse not very pleasing, she wrote in a book.
I believe that this lessened pleasure of sexuality to be the TRUE main cause of normative culture having attitude of sexual harassment. When you put a taint on the dynamics of what is supposed to be a bonding/pleasant experience, the value of male sexuality will naturally be ruined. So not only do cut males not realize what their missing, but also females don’t know what they’re missing, just like how females don’t really know what passion is like with the archetypal “nice guy” that females dismiss as “shy” because they haven’t seriously tried him.

Being known for anti-m.g.m. research, I was sent a letter to my e-mail. It was a claim of a major mistake made by a 24-year-old Russian immigrant to U.S. who agreed to m.g.m. after his mid-20s. He stated that the former Soviet Union (Ukraine) did not practice m.g.m. (& it was discouraged.) He claimed that prior to m.g.m. his orgasms were  like “AHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHH!” They were continuous, prolonged, followed by “all body” sensation that tickled & sent “waves” all over. Further:

“My grandfather once told me a story about how they used to train them to ride horses without a saddle, which hurt a lot & after a while, a layer grew on buttocks that made such riding painless. That’s what eventually happens to cut penises.”

We know what divorce truly is: women using the daddy-state on men when the husband does not please her anymore, etc., like using a rabid dog on something she doesn’t like. But it gets even more bestial than that:
The daddy-state – ~5% of arbitrary masculinity – that women love creates predatory cultures because of the greed due to attracting drives. It’s not fully conscious:
Males have what the cosmetic companies want. The similar type of skin meant to protect your eyelids is the same type of skin that naturally makes the gland excellent. Because of that, the cosmetic industry wants the source of fibroblasts – foreskins – to make various creams.
Meanwhile, whores will even claim that civilization is exploitative of the female body.

One surgeon, Lewis Sayre, (1870s) theorized that m.g.m. treated muscle paralysis. This was when reflex neurosis was taken seriously.M.g.m. was then used by other doctors for asthma, epilepsy, indigestion & hernia.Sayre’s reasoning was just relatively not that old considering the relatively minuscule amount of development with treating boy genitalia. Considering that, why should you take anything doctors say seriously about “fixing” boys?

In the U.S., doctors were content to continue to collect payments for doing m.g.m..

We think of scientists as very objective, & they usually are much more than others, but they’re also people, so they’re not totally objective.

As nutrition, shelter, etc. – the basics – become easily accessed, as it has, the further evolution is largely a moral one, so what makes us need MGM?

CPS – Canadian Paediatric Society – reconfirmed in 1996 what it claimed in 1975 – a new evidence based policy statement that m.g.m. should not be done.

The foreskin is fused to the head of the penis at birth. Its function is to stop contamination. Before the doctor can remove the skin, he has to separate the skin with insertion of a probe between the glans, then do a scraping around.

The rate of m.g.m. for good/wealthy-income owning males in U.S. was & is still high – 90%-67.7% [1995-2008]. For those with only & less than a high-school diploma it was 37.7% – 51.9%.
In order for civilization to be saved, it needs to, A., eliminate chivalry, &, B., eliminate m.g.m.

Even Joseph Ledoux, a professional neuroscientist, believes that fear & anxiety, Which has aggression as just another aspect of fear because it’s just simply a another choice of how to deal with fear – a desire for extra survival instincts, are not innate. They are cognitively assembled.

The new-age or spiritual idea that women have “more wisdom” comes from the fact that women only see the ~5% of arbitrary masculinity, whether it’s radical Feminists complaining about rape-culture – a small portion – or other women fantasizing about the apex of masculinity & also that women haven’t really done anything of merit to the comparison as males have, so their idelness is seen as having less turmoil than the standard, fixated model of ~5% arbitrary masculinity, which is really not what most of masculinity is.

A medieval piece of advice stated:

“She will court the man who is uncircumcised in the flesh & lie against his breast with great passion…”

Infection during prolonged periods of battle has crippled armies. Why would you be in that situation firstly? The answer is survival mechanisms. If they were less concerned with survival mechanisms & more concerned with harnessing conditions & surroundings with different ways, they could’ve eliminated much more of the problems anyway. Don’t you understand? It’s not cutting that’s the solution. It’s the lack of intellectual discipline to control, firstly, the self, secondly, surroundings that’s the problem.

M.G.M. has also become a fashion in Japan. It’s promoted in “girlie” magazines, etc..

The next part is extremely surprising. It was done by credible people involved in 1.: the Department of Molecular Cell Biology & Immunology, VU University Medical Center, Amsterdam, The Netherlands. 2.: Department of Dermatology & Venereology, University Hospital of Geneva, Switzerland. 3.: Department of Medical Oncology, VU University Medical Center, Amsterdam, The Netherlands. Even the WashingtonPost did something with it: ‘Scientists Discover Natural Barrier’ to HIV’
Nature Publishing Group did a study: ‘Langerin is a natural barrier to HIV-1 transmission by Langerhans cells’ Conclusion: Strategies to combat infection must not interfere with langerin function.
One of the main reasons that industry by the ~5% arbitrary masculinity is motivated to collect foreskins is that the skin contains substances promoting health-cells. It’s a skin that is “alive.” Langerin is lost by m.g.m.. Langerin actually kills disease. Industry then uses the skin for various cosmetic purposes – injections, etc. – that is spent with millions.
We humans are supposed to allow the organic mechanisms to evolve the immunity.

The boy then develops a defensive, armored psychological state after m.g.m..

MGM is a direct example of hierarchical control. A modern example is US forces. Boot-camp is forcing & taunting. Subsumed by dominance hierarchy, the male is subject to enforce excessive survival instincts to give to her.

Economic & social change has influenced men to struggle, exemplified as “herbivores,” in Japan. Japan struggles with mental health. It’s not quantifiable when they don’t even recognize it as a problem. They have long work hours – 80-hour weeks. As gynocentric survival instincts takes its toll, males are persuaded to try MGM with the pretense that it “enhances self-confidence” by a common discursive strategy of clinics using the deployment of “scientific” facts as compelling reasons. The male body is seen as a commodity. You’ll often find these persuasions in male oriented books, such as older boys’ comics. There is a growing tolerance of divorce among contemporary Japanese women, there is info. that their men have “failed” to satisfy women’s demands, as usual. Can you beleive it? That culture that has the Geisha, a good sex education that emphasizes the female body as menarche & pregnancy process & where men are supposed to “come first” still has problems by whores. It just proves that being an “alpha” male is redundant. It was notable of the 1970s & 1980s, women refused marriage because they coudn’t find the three H’s – height, high education, high income. Most of Japanese culture is efficient. It has a reputation as a developed country. These whores were just deluded because the more you give to them, the more entitled whores become. With womens’ delusions putting stress to males to be an unreal ideal, women “push” more & more negative definitions of what maleness is. It’s the same repeating pattern: survival mechanisms for the feminine has exhausted, devastated masculinity. Japanese men are doing temporary or easier jobs. As a result of what women have done to them, females have seen them as “unmanly” for taking a “vacation.” Women have created “beta” males. The salary-man produced by survival instincts due to the feminine has created the “invisible” man as “nobody.” The place that’s known for overwork by being driven by survival mechanisms – providing life for whores – is also known for suicide. When gynocentrism flourishes, men are ruined. Women manufactured undesirable/”weak” men by way of the survival mechanisms they habituate that links reaction with maleness that trivializes & silences male experience. The prevalent survival mechanisms due to the feminine that males adopt to give to females creates marginalized males.

There are two types of phimosis: Physiological (congenital) phimosis & pathological phimosis. Physiological phimosis is usually benign & supposed to be left alone for early childhood. Pathological phimosis is a rare situation that happens when older. (Doctors should study stretching methods rather than cutting.)

Wherever FGM happens, MGM also does.
All types of FGM are generally seen as a violation, yet MGM is dismissed as “benign.”

Removing the clitoris, which occurs with FGM, is done to ensure that females do not derive pleasure, encouraging that they remain “pure.” The male equivalent to that would be to remove the head of the penis (possibly more). FGM is much worse, but happens much less.

Our society has a very hypocritical attitude towards sexual men, especially women have this attitude: If you’re a school-teacher who was seen trying to flirt with some females at a bar he’ll be seen as a “perv,” yet if you’re “James Bond” – doing all these unnecessary, mindless things – he’ll be glorified: women are allowed to express sex-positivity, but when a male does it, he has to be some animate/ toxic/ mumbling/ intruding figure to earn it.

In 1997, Canadian doctors did a study for the purpose of knowing what type of anesthesia was best for relieving pain of m.g.m.. They needed a control group to compare babies without anesthesia. The doctors realized that babies without anesthesia had so much pain, one of which even had a seizure & some began choking, that the study was too unethical to continue. If that severe level of pain happens without anesthesia, the pain is extreme even with it.
Only a minority of doctors use anesthesia.

Reality check: The body is a historical repository. The pain causes a rewiring of the brain. It causes problems with intimacy, low self-esteem, anger & PTSD. It is a myth that the baby “won’t” remember the pain. He won’t remember it the way we remember what our faces looked like this morning in front of the mirror, but he’ll remember it of the way of being in a mental mode of being “armored.” Acts of aggression, excessive selfishness can be traced by the moral architecture done early in life & goes to the neurobiological & emotional development.

Even a publisher not associated with the fringe: Psychology Today published an article stating that it is a myth that a baby will “sleep through it.” What actually happens is the baby often experiences a state of shock, which looks like a quiet state.

There is ample clinical evidence of the negative consequences of separating the new-born from the warmth of the mother – one of her main functions.

Defending m.g.m. requires dismissing/minimizing the harm & producing extremely exaggerated clinical claims about protection from future harm. Cultural conformity is a major force perpetuating m.g.m..

The divorce law means basically nothing, but that society usually allows it, especially women. The legal aspects are almost just as much a distraction from female nature as Feminism is. People tend to forget & not realize that both Feminism & female nature promote the same exact thing – the female ego unchecked.
With that unchecked female ego, females weed to try to get the ~5% arbitrary masculinity. Yes, women are evil. The female ego is a very destructive force to society.

Those who blame things like pornography for ruining society are the same ones who haven’t even realized that surgical rape is the true cause of their lack of utilizing control for establishment.

Obviously, there are others that are defensive about having experienced m.g.m.. They become pro-cutting as a way of coping. This seems to be an internalized anger.

The message given to new-born boys traumatized by surgical rape is that: you have just arrived in a very hostile, malevolent place. This is also the majority of how we get “don’t be a beta male” nonsense.” Additionally conveyed:  your sex center is not respected, which also accounts for males doing other things as a replacement for bonding, ranging from bad experimentation to other forms of buying.
First paralyzed during birth, then humiliated for trying to draw attention to the reality of m.g.m..

I’ve even heard a woman state that she would think that a man was “gay” if she saw him crying in a public setting. If one woman said that, it’s obvious what the spectrum of female collectivism would interpret.

Reality check: Amputation of the erogenous zone consequently transforms the mind to a “lifeless zombie.”: neuropsychological intervention or non-genetic bioengineering.

The dictionary states:

noun, Psychiatry.

1. difficulty in experiencing, expressing, & describing emotional responses.

But if we analyze this definition correctly, it would translate to:

1. A psychological state acquired by males which the human female is usually receptive to.

2. An acquired psychological state of males which the human female has monopolized majority of attention with the aid of a small portion of an aggregate of males that has given her a gladdened state with the expense of the other males.

Dr. Whitfield has presented that depression (or lack there of – apathy/dispassion) & emotional trauma that affects future behavior is by disruption of neurodevelopment – a form of mind damage.

Women buy that state of masculinity more than anyone. Do you know why that is? It’s because women are naturally prone to various forms of sociopathic tendencies.

Dr. James Demeo believes that it is “only” the influence of desert regions that has caused the majority of the most severe cultures of surgical rape, sex-misapplication, social abuse & warfare. That definitely added to it. The main, specific, core cause is actually survival mechanisms of the feminine. Those survival mechanisms with extreme, harsh climates brings out the worst of masculinity.

MGM as child abuse has gotten nearly no attention on child-abuse. In fact, the society considers adolescent romance as a mischievous thing & encourages trading with vapid “hook up” culture.

A major cause for social abuse/negative ego is the tendency of replacing romance/sensitivity with exertion & trial. Society is constructed as social stress acceptance. Violence, drug abuse, conforming to lame situations is the result.
The behavioral effects of marijuana – a popular emasculating drug – is: low self-esteem, loss of identity, loss of motivation, etc., & it is actually encouraged by Hollywood, etc..
Overseas, the more violence-prone is characterized by political bullying, religious bullying, etc..

Feminist persuasion & related factions politicize agendas with the consequences of stopping the cooperative “search for truth” because of the very fact that females evolved to be more selfish. Women are generally anti-science, which is not much different from the bullying formerly typed.

The greatest threat to civilization comes from depriving the young of affection.
Violence is often offered as a “solution” to violence.
The common association of sex with violence implies deprivation of affection.

People are searching for other forms of satisfaction, yet most of them are substitutes for not knowing how sexuality or affection works.

Until the ruin of affection, etc., is understood – survival mechanisms, gynocentric aggression will continue to escalate.

A developmental neuropsychologist, James W. Prescott, has convinced that violence & affection have effects on each other: one inhibits the other.

Certain sensory experience during the formative years of development will create neuropsychological predisposition for either struggle-seeking – the norm – or sensual-seeking.

Brande F. Steele, psychiatrist at the University of Colorado, noted that almost all women who abuse had never experienced orgasm (not that giving them pleasure will make them better people necessarily: I’m condoning male terms.) The female is generally more promiscuous anyway, which is a type of abuse to the male’s tendency to stabilize a relationship & stop the search. Women are much more opportunistic/selfish. Without the true androcentric/phallocentric control, women are problematic. When frequent self-needs are combined with deprivation of affection, the result is self-interest & frequent rates of narcissistic personality disorder.

Crime, violence, etc., has increased. According to FBI statistics, Violence increased 53% between 1967 & 1972. Rape to 70%.

There is evidence of preference & acceptance for sexual violence instead of proper sexuality in the U.S.. Pop culture films, which I don’t care to name, depict sexually violent films, & yet films featuring proper sexual pleasure is less respected. The bondage, discipline, sadistic masochism is in many romance novels read by women, with the idea that pain “helps” build strong character & relationships – female pornography.
If violence is high, sensuality is low, & the converse is true.
The depraved sexuality/violence factor found in aggressive cultures is the same for modern industrialization.

The US is a competitive/aggressive/violent society. Consequently, it supports drugs, including corporate ones.

Signs of males not complying to the norms will be seen as “weakness” to females.

Reality check: the competitive drives of the survival mechanisms of female collectivism, which makes boys popular with the expense of other more intelligent males, should be replaced by phallocentric cooperation & a pursuit of the intellect for its own sake.
Without females & males properly compartmentalized, especially during early age of the time of schooling, we experience reversals & regression, etc.. For example: almost all advertising nowadays features the idea of having or getting sex appeal. So the present time features attitudes & changes that have been done before.
Modern philosophy & even science, such as the medical practice of m.g.m., etc., presents the idea that there is no absolute laws – whatever “turns you on,” & anyone who doesn’t think like that is seen as a “crazy loser.”

Feminism is theoretical, & they might claim to want to lead society, but If we lived in a society that’s even more matriarchal, females would then chose more negative male figures, which is the state.

Reality check: premature weaning of the male – cutting of the boy’s genitals, by the repressive social institutions of survival instincts, comes the careless, rigid, dull, nihilistic, components, which are expressed with a plethora of either disguised & unconscious, or blatantly obvious ways.

Since m.g.m. was spread as a product of the most extreme people who came from hyper-arid deserts, this is all the more reason for siding & regions above to monopolize phallocentric polygamy that would replace gynocentric survival mechanisms & would overpower the spread of psychopathic influences originally intensified by the collectivist gynocentric survival mechanisms with the desert.
Even Scottsdale, Az., an extremely unfriendly, rigid, lame, stupid, rude place, was ranked one of the rudest cities in US, with Phoenix as #2. But I have to remind there are other rude cities like New York, Miami & others, because U.S. is home to m.g.m..

Childhood trauma without physical abuse can cause various psychiatric disorders: anxiety & panic disorder being some. If non-physical abuse can do that, of course, surgical rape will do another effect.
Initially identified with, but not limited to, combat veterans, PTSD results by natural disaster, etc., etc., & yet the experience that would motivate one for combat is m.g.m..
We know that biology endows us with the structure of the brain. However, myriad connections are influenced by experience. We know that changes of hormone levels, early experiences influence brain development:
When extreme cortisol levels attack the hippocampus of the brain, it showed it’s alteration by lower verbal memory scores.
Even small alterations of environment had lasting changes in development, behavior & response to stress. Even five minutes of human handling during a rat’s infancy produced lifelong beneficial changes.
Isolation produces stress that has deleterious effect on neurology & behavior development.
Using the models of basic neglect & abuse, low rates of proper maternal attention decrease production of certain hormonal processes. This decreases serotonin in the hippocampus & affects development of receptors for stress hormone: glucocorticoid. Since corticosterone, one of our primary stress hormones, is kept in check by a technical feedback process that depends on these same stress hormone receptors, inadequate develpment increases risk of an excessive stress hormone response to adversity. Lack of proper maternal attention predisposes one to have heightened level of adrenaline response & fear.
Finally, wrong maternal attention is associated with a lifelong decrease in production of the hormone oxytocin in the brain. Oxytocin is a critical hormone of love & maintaining monogamus relationships. By affecting such hormones, early abuse could predispose one to diminished capacity for sexual perfection. Thanks to m.g.m., which causes either defeatist or dominant mentalities, it’s no wonder commitment is actually seen as a joke when oxytocin levels are ruined coupled with vasopressin mediated arousal. We now have females with men who basically exhibit borderline personality disorder & lame relationships.
With the female proclivity to greed, expansionism combined with the survival mechanisms of female collectivism & the female ego to announce herself as a career woman, meaningless blogger, etc., you will have an increase of such phenomena.
Children who have been abused even meet the diagnostic criteria for ADHD & impulsiveness. It’s no wonder there’s a meme that boys are failing school when m.g.m. predisposes boys to nihilism.
The brain is more malleable before puberty.
Another consequence of childhood maltreatment is limbic irritability, which tends to produce dysphoria, aggression & violence.
Being “too nice” is actually supposed to be the state. Effrontery, irritability, dissociation, being insipid, decreased judgment & decreased verbal ability – isn’t it all familiar? That is unfortunately the norm, so next time you are bombarded with some whore emphasizing “body positivity” for her slovenly life-style, realize there’s more important issues.

Scientist: Simon Baron-Cohen is missing this reality of m.g.m., as he states that men are prone to relating with people as just things. That’s true because we’re objectively prone to some kind of structures, which is more of a net gain for society, but he has no serious studies of m.g.m., which is a practice started by only a small percentage of masculinity, just like the model of male aggression is overdone. It’s true to a certain degree that women are empathic, i.e. lacking the ability to seriously evaluate good character, so they’re taken by immoral people/situations, etc., which is how they’re collectivist. Male empathy though is more about solving problems rather than commingling with bad situations & people, etc..
Simon Baron Cohen seems to be pandering to the feminine collective by not stating that the majority of male aggression is a vestige of the merciless past when we had to be extra violent for security, etc..

There is no direct tie between testosterone & human criminality. There is only an INDIRECT tie.

Delinquent behavior is more common among children raised with absent fathers.

When the level of oxytocin increases, generosity, etc, with strangers also happens. When oxytocin increases, other neurotransmitters are released: Serotonin decreases anxiety. Dopamine is associated with goal-directed bahaviors.

The problem is: women see male-female friendship as “activity friends” for a lack of a better description: The friendship is based on exchange of popularity, greed, etc., rather than compassion. Women think of male “healing” as “creepy.”

When wives are not sexed properly, she then becomes neurotic, rigid, & frustrated, making the kids vulnerable to a hostile mother: her delusions & greed makes unhealthy implications when not checked by the masculine energy.

It was reported that a culture with only a 2% population of men who experienced m.g.m. committed more than 80% of rapes.

Almost all wars involved a country that did m.g.m. since 1991. This includes US vs. Vietnam, which was obviously before 1991.

Dr. Tinari proceded a study which found that m.g.m. causes brain damage, particularly of areas of the brain involved with reasoning, emotions & perception.
His was not popularized, not because it’s “wrong,” but because it disrupts the status quo.



References: (I do not 100% condone all references derived.)

Circumcision Exposed – Rethinking A Medical & Cultural Tradition by Bill Ray Boyd, pg. 19-23, 52-53, 60-64, 71-73

Phimosis, Adult Circumcision, and Buried Penis | by Ryan P Terlecki, MD

antiintellectual – dictionary-dot-com

P.C. Remondino, History of circumcision from the earliest times to the present: Moral & physical reasons for its performance, p.224

The Barbarity of Circumcision as a Remedy for Congenital Abnormality, p. 16 by Herbert Snow

A Treatise On The Venereal Disease by John Hunter, p.221

Frances’ tough stance on female genital mutilation is working, say campaigners by Kim Wilsher – TheGuardian-dot-com

Female genital mutilation (FGM) – legislation, Policy & Guidance – nspcc-dot-org-dot-uk

Douglas Gairder, “The fate of the foreskin: A study of circumcision,” British Medical Journal, p. 1437

William E. Krueger, Winston-Salem NC, USA, open letter to newspapers & intact organizations, 12 July 1993

C.J. Cold & J.R. Taylor, “The prepuce”, British Journal of Urology, Vol. 83, supplement 1 (Circumcision), 1999, p. 41

Kristen O’Hara, Sex As Nature Intended, p. 20, 29-30, 66, 67

Infant Circumcision, Fibroblasts & The Cosmetics Industry by Barbarossa – Sheddingoftheego-dot-com

Why Is Circumcision So Popular in America by Mathew Tontonoz – mathewtontonozo-dot-com

History of Circumcision, Introduction, Recent History – cirp-dot-org

Time for U.S. Parents to Reconsider the Acceptability of Infant Male Circumcision by Morten Frisch – huffingtonpost-dot-com

Rate of Circumcision in Adults & Newborns – circinfo-dot-net

Anxious: The Modern Mind in the Age of Anxiety by Joseph E Ledoux, book review by Liz Hoggard – independent-dot-com

Medieval Advice for the Circumcised by Joshua Levine – levinehistory-dot-wordpress-dot-com

Circumcision – What Caused Many Cultures to Ritually Remive the Foreskin? – circinfo-dot-net

Involuntary Foreskinectomy Awareness | Buying Baby Foreskin by Phallusy – sites-dot-google-dot-com

Langerin is a natural barrier to HIV-1 transmission by Langerhans cells | by Lot de Witte, Alexey Nabatov, Marjorie Pion, Donna Fluitsma, Marein A W P de Jong, Tanja de Gruijl, Vincent Piguet, Yvette van Kooyk & Teunis B H Geijtenbeek – nature-dot-com-slash-naturemedicine

Scientists Discover ‘Natural Barrier’ to HIV by E.J. Mundell | HealthDay Reporter – washingtonpost-dot-com

Burton, John W., Culture and the Human Body: An Anthropological Perspective, pg.:

History of Circumcision – d-dot-umn-dot-edu

One of the world’ most developed & debt-ridden countries is undergoing a population crisis – here’s a possible reason why by Drake Baer – businessinsider-dot-com

The long and short of male circumcision in Japan | by Matt Treyvaud – japantimes-dot-co-jp

Phimosis & Paraphimosis – soc-dot-ucsb-dot-edu


Incidene & Distribution of Gental Cutting Worldwide – circumstitions-dot-com

FGC vs MGC – Circumsitions-dot-com

The ‘beauty’ of Male Circumcision in Japan: Gender, Sexuality & the Male Body in a medical practice by Genaro Castro-Vazquez p:4-6, 9 – researchgate-dot-net

Myths about Circumcision You LIkely Believe | by Darcia Narvaez, Ph.D. – PsychologyToday-dot-com

Reich Speaks of Freud | Wilhelm Reich. Kurt Eissler, p. 28

Psychological implications of circumcision – acroposthion-dot-com

alexithymia – dictionary-dot-com

It’s Not all in Your Head: Unearthing the Deep Roots of Depression | Tony Giordano, p. 130

Research Summary & Author Interview on Saharasia – orgonelad-dot-org

The Journal of Orgonomy, Vol33 | W.B. Apple, Ph.d., pg 77

Body Pleasure & The Origins Of Violence | by James W. Prescott – Bulltetin of the Atomic Scientists, p. 10, 11, 14

Wounds That Time Won’t Heal: The Neurobiology of Child Abuse | Martin H. Teicher – Cerebrum – The Dana Forum on Brain Science, p.: 4-6, 10-14

The Origins & Diffusion of Patrism in Saharasia, c. 4000 BCE: Evidence for a Worldwide, Climate-Linked Geographical Pattern in Human Behavior
by James Demeo, Ph.D. – orgonelab-dot-org

The 5 Hidden Reasons Men Become Violent & What We Can Do to Make the World Safer | by JedDiamond – menalive-dot-com

Survey: Phoenix, Scottsdale among rudest U.S. cities, according to Travel & leisure – abc15-dot-com

Phoenix ranked No. 2 Rudest City in U.S. – azfamily-dot-com

Excuse you! Phoenix ranked one of America’s rudest cities – ktar-dot-com

Phoenix ranked NO. 2 Rudest city in U.S. – 12news-dot-com

As Long As We Have Slaughterhouses, We’ll Have Wars | DR. Sahadeva Dasa p. 149

Circumcision Leads To Serial Killing & Criminal Behavior – birthofanewearth-dot-blogspot-dot-com

Extreme trauma from male circumcision causes damage to areas of the brain | Ethan A.Huff – naturalnews-dot-com

More Thoughts On “Mtv.” by Jessie Nagy

neo normal idiot

“I think that whores will accept me if I do an act of nihilism, etc..”

I remember I was the only one doing his own thing, & these fucking “Mtv.” idiots retaliated against me. Because one guy wasn’t taking their scene seriously, they took it as an insult that I wasn’t wasting money on them & comparing myself to these losers, so they thought: “Let’s take this guy doing his own thing & use him as a scapegoat because we’re too stupid to hate the “GG Allin” whores & bullies in our own scene.” That’s female collectivism.

Women decry objectification, yet women are the ones who use men as utilities. Make a mistake, you’re replaced.
I’ve heard of a theory from a close associate, not a book, etc., that women’s brains are adapted to not seriously detect hardships – realistic masculinity – that affect adults. That’s why women love fake people. Even robots “crash”, glitch, malfunction, & “do not compute,” & yet whores still can’t even realize that realistic aspect because of what they only see in masculinity of him being a “cog in the machine.” That’s obvious. It seems very likely that this is a vestigial instinct of the feminine, which is just as out-of-place in modern society as the male instinct to get into fist-fights. It’s junk remnants.

First the strong (bad boy), then they take advantage of functional males, then they use the state to divorce-rape when she’s had enough of him.
In fact, “hypergamy” of American context isn’t even real hypergamy. The original hypergamy comes from the assigned marriages of India, which is done by calculating males – beta males. In America – the way m.r.a.s misapply it, women are not assigned to marriage that would stop them from fleeing with some gambler idiot. It’s actually the exact opposite of hypergamy. With the original context, they can’t sample one guy to the next. It doesn’t work like that.

You can’t hide it anymore: unhealthy rivalry/gossip, jealousy, primeval impulse, blaming, even psychopathy is “all over you.” Women have no respect, or close to no respect, for male experience. Why should we have respect for them?

If you want to find if something is good, you don’t need professional critics anymore. You have non-professional systems due to the advent of info. acceleration, which is increasing more & more to the future. If there was more such communication during the past, gynocentrism could’ve been stopped. A lot of these emergent things are more independent. We’ve now had revolutions, & this isn’t a debate on politics, I’m making a point, when Markos was overthrown in the Philippines.
Ferdinand Marcos declared martial law & gave himself near absolute power. He had many of his opponents & critics arrested.
That revolution was basically bloodless.
When the “Velvet” revolution occurred, there was no violence. All they had to do was get enough people informed.
There’s predictions that major changes will happen due to nobody leaving their living rooms, etc.: All they do is something on the net with some emergent blogging type of thing.
A lot of men spend time thinking about how we’re not “good enough,” or whatever, to the delusional ideal of female greed & inconsistency. If you want to know if something is good, you don’t necessarily need the norm: When you investigate how you could get complex, adapted, optimal systems, you don’t need bygone models. People naturally want to put some label to what they don’t like or understand to try to make cohesion of it, but when something is totally new, you can’t call it by a bygone thing.

Why am I obsessed with pointing the reality of “Mtv.” Shouldn’t I be “getting a life,” as they’d say? Because that’s the most important time of your life. That’s when life is being planned (or lack there of), so that’s going to have an effect on society from the micro to the macro. “Mtv” has got to get taken down because it is a core of which female nature operates by to navigate into other realms of life. If the roots are gone, the upper branches will be weakened.

Kids are peer-bonding. Because the fact that most young people are “nothing” – they have not had serious realizations & experiences, they will constantly look for external stimulus for their empty selves.
This is the most blatant of female psychology: When there is a state of what is supposed to be being content – “awkward,” according to whores, she feels free to start looking for other things. This is the most blatant with the farce of pair-bonding, which is really just whores trying to sum how trendy a male is.
There’s a belief in the media that the youth demographic is the “thing.” There’s this idea that you have to appeal to the youth, & to appeal to the youth, you have to show them peer-bonding. Real, serious pair bonding is too painful to show.
They lack the capacity to productively know pain, disagree, etc.. They lack maturity, wisdom, the capacity to understand another perspective. Young people simply can not be really good friends to each other. They can be play-mates, they can have lots of fun. They’re kids. They don’t have that capacity to the same degree, other than a little. It’s about fashions & the cool alcohol to experiment with & distractions – all the enjoyable, useless stuff of the teenage years. & so if you want to get your message across to those demographics, you generally must show some kind of peer-bonding. You can not show, wise, serious, evolved, engaged lessons from an archetype of an authority. It’s more opinions & less questions with them.
That’s why whenever you see older people arguing, you don’t see them resort to physical attacks to the same degree as you do younger people. Older people have experienced more painful situations & have matured to the point of being better capable of hearing the other person’s words.
In fact, if young people don’t resort to physical attacks, they will try to trivialize it as “just bitter.”

Sex therapists claim climaxing more carelessly begins during youth & then becomes unconsciously habituated later. We have women to largely thank for that considering the rigid goals & the media-driven performance standard for them. When you’re younger, there’s also a tendency of trying not to get caught, then that mentality becomes a habit.

When I had my first blog on social media years ago, enemies projected their minds on my agenda: I was starting to gain some amount of gossip towards me due to the “hate speech.” Casual enemies made the assumption that I was presenting a fake identity because of the recognition I was gaining. They assumed that this recognition was due to some kind of “excitement” that I was offering, so not only did they make a false assumption of me being fake, they also made the assumption that I was trying to be “intense,” or whatever, when I never even implied that. I was offering philosophy. Teenagers & the like are not the “deep” people they like to think they are. They’re very cruel: If a guy walks over with the “wrong” loose pants, the out-dated version of smoke vapes, or whatever, it’s “I hate that guy.”

Now, women generally have this teenager peer-bonding mentality even when they’re older much more than anyone, & the males associated with whores will have those similar traits “rubbed” on them. They are in a perpetual state of infantile psychology.
“Mtv.” is just as much a part of female psychology as tampons.

Even female school teachers will label inquisitive boys as troublemakers, diagnosing them with ADHD, often by teachers with no medical training.

Let us read Briffault’s Law to prove how female nature is in a perpetual state of infantile “Mtv.”:

Robert Stephen Briffault (1876 – 1948), trained as a surgeon. Famous for anthropology. (His political beliefs are not of concern.)
“Old news.” No, women are still primitive.

“The female, not the male, determines all the conditions of the animal family.”

“Any benefit already provided by the male in the past does not guarantee continued or future associations.”

When I was working for a company, & this anecdote is valid because of female collectivism making most anecdotes about them perfectly scientific, they had me trained by females. They barely trained me, & when I kept asking them questions, a natural process of an initial phase, regarding policies, etc., which varies from different places, the female trainers just got more & more agitated by me until they influenced the male manager enough to get rid of me. It was because these fucking whores thought my questioning was a sign of “weakness.” It’s that same, exact teenager mentality of cruelty towards others who don’t have the same lifestyles.

There’s even reports of whores looting from previous partners after they were finalized years ago.

Women love competition, & they also become angry if their friends are doing better, so you can be sure a lot of negativity & anger from female collective exclusivity will be directed towards you when the relationship is already fine. Since that is her network, even though you are not to blame, you will have conflict, & her network will remain collective – “you go, girl.”
It’s also why a sequel to ’50 Shades Of Greed’ has another whore who is trying to dangerously get involved with the unavailable man. Women love that kind of suspense, especially because that particular pattern allows women to indulge with their collectivism – another whore is interested, so now they’ve gotten yet another greedy craving explored as they’re reminded of his perceived value from others. Female sexuality is disgusting.
I’ve even heard of a disgusting anecdote of which a best-friend of an ex-wife made a flirtatious offer to the husband when his wife wasn’t near. He declined. When he went home pondering about how he was going to tell his wife about this, he came home to be verbally abused for trying to “seduce” her because of that other lady’s claims, & that female collectivism already ruined it.
When a man sees another successful, he will have ideas influenced. Women though will see it more threatening, insulting or try to bring it their level.

If she doesn’t like bad-boys & she appears to like nice-guys, the probability is that she’s the one with a bad character, so don’t be surprised when you realize you’ve been trapped.

Whenever women are unhappy, rather than dealing with it sensibly, they get the state involved. Women will feel that something is missing. (Yeah, your fucking lack of realism, whore.) She signed the contract. Why should she be allowed to ruin the contract just because she doesn’t want to be bothered with meeting her responsibilities?
& that’s only a small amount of the extremely immoral ways that women use the legal system to divert blame on themselves, while also making profits from victims. They’re like J***. They do this on another level without the state by implying that the other was a “beta” male: “I stabbed his dog, so he’s a beta male.” That’s how whore psychology is.

Women claim to be emotionally superior, yet if a man were to cry, they will think lesser of him. Does that sound like an emotionally superior person? Women save those emotions for other women, unless the man has something she wants, to which she would likely fake it. That lack of concern for male experience is more associated with psychopathy. With their emotional correctness, they expect men to be “punching bags” for women’s wild-animal emotions.

Unfortunately, what bearded goat owners of the deserts say, & I’m not advocating for this, is true: beating women is very effective. By trying to have an engaged, civilized debate, they’ve already thought of you as “too nice,” “creepy,” etc.. I’m not saying we should beat them, but we could benefit with assigning them to only the right to earn menial chores.

Punishing women is a waste of effort. Why discipline her when you can just replace her? Women even feed off of discipline. Do you really want to kiss, fuck & protect her after she’s been defiling your foundation? casting her aside & throwing her out like the piece of trash that she is would have a lot more effect. There’s plenty of other pretty girls.

Marriage to whores is: “This is going to be more opportunities to hoard.” To men it’s: “This is going to be a tranquil state, I’ve earned it, it’s more complete,” etc.. That’s not the way women generally interpret it. It’s just the female ego. Nothing more.

Women got no fault divorce, abused it, then ruined the family units. Men got blamed for that as “addicted to porn” & other ways to blame men for women’s faults.
They blame men for consumerism, yet women drive it – 70% on useless junk.

There’s 2 ways to get money: earning (inheriting, which is another aspect of earning since the ancestors earned it, then gave it to the progeny they owned) & stealing. Since stealing is illegal, many of these parasites will esteem themselves as a false authority – artists, etc., creating hyperbole that there are problems that need addressing, using drama or even fear, shame, guilt. Those perceived to be a threat to their way of life & revenue will be subject to shaming language, claims of hate-speech, etc..
Women hate logic. That is why all these easy degrees were invented, as women want the state to bring it to their level, to allow women to claim intelligence by bragging about a pretentious degree, like the arts. A woman’s degree often only proves that she stored some information. One of women’s relentless insistence is that they have “profound wisdom” because they can retain superficial facts, usually demonstrated in an argument, addressing a minute detail or ad hominem, then often exaggerate that you were being dangerous or threatening.

Now I still have competition with lesser jobs because, let’s realize it, a whore has more chance of getting the job that I want as clerk, restaurant server, etc., because she’s cuter, This is also done by female hiring managers because of female collectivism. I don’t have a direct statistic for it, but I bet you anything that a woman has, & I’m not complaining about it, I’m just making a point, more chance of getting a sexual experience with another women by begging for it than a man because of female collectivism & the female obsession with novelty.

The natural instincts are for men to protect & serve women. Women’s natural instinct is to get attention from men for men to do things for her, & they use the government & the state for protection & provision, so the whole concept of a husband is ruined thanks to them: It’s like women calling the police on their husbands – disgusting. Sarcasm: Gee, what a great winner you are for keeping your whore happy enough to never make the daddy-state coerce you: You made it so far with a feel-good bully. Our society is no longer “natural.” It is mechanized, yet women still have much more of a tendency to produce immature instincts.



MGTOW | The Disposable Male: It Ends Here (Unique book with no author’s name) pg 14, 31-33, 113

How Filipino People Power Toppled Dictator Marcos – BBC-dot-com

Filipinos campaign to overthrow dictator (People Power), 1983-1986 – nvdatabas-dot-swarthmore-dot-edu

The Velvet Revolution – tavaana-org

Male Multiple Orgasm by Somraj Pokras, pg. 18


Science Finds Negation For Female Sexuality | by Jessie Nagy

the different hated

People addicted to entertainment call what doesn’t entertain them “awkward.” Science & philosophy is supposed to be “awkward.” They don’t understand the first principles. More questions & less opinions from those idiots should happen.

First of all, women don’t even know what “shy” is. Women are so fucking facile/stupid. Have they ever heard of the “strong silent type?”
They hate the different.
Women have no concept of masculinity other than of what they can benefit from it & the force that helps them occlude multi aspects of masculinity.

Female sexuality has a brutish component to it, yet it is difficult to find serious discussion of it, even scholarly reports of it.

When I was reading The final chapter: ‘The Question Of Female Masochism’ of ‘Sexual Utopia In Power’ by F. Roger Devlin, to spare you of the disgusting paragraphs, the conclusion was mostly (with correlations/subtlety. I have to repeat that, of course, not all women are like that, but they are related to that. ): A thing for nasty boys. If you put a woman in a room of a dozen men, she’ll be focused on the meanest, brutal fellow in the room.

I had major problems with that chapter, not because of the reality of female sexuality – of course, I already knew that, but a misleading concept: “sensitive” vs. dominance:

” Such women may claim to want a sensitive fellow who is in touch with his feelings….What women say comes from their cerebral cortex; how they choose men depends on their evolutionary more primitive limbic system . Even campus Feminists choose arrogant jocks to “hook up” with.”

Female panda bears continue to instigate fights with male panda bears to test how strong he is.
Abused masculinity – that’s what women like: “How many “war scratches” does he have?” That’s what women think is sexy: “How tough is his mindset due to a hard life?” They just don’t call it what it is. They call it “dark” instead or “mature/leadership” or ” he has depth.”
Women do this kind of behavior of the panda bear, much of which is instinctive. The more aware women are about those tests, the more manipulative they are.: She does Slamming doors, etc., & other passive aggressive tests, the silent treatment of claiming there’s nothing wrong when there really is – horrible communication skills. Her emotions do not seriously hear & respect the male logic. She then withholds sex because you dared to be masculine – seriously logical.
Isn’t it disgusting that women are much more prone to behaving like wild animals than men are?
The men who promote this kind of “alpha” behavior to be validated by her tests are promoting that female/wild animal behavior that was too late & failed the “class-room” of how to live in a structural world of masculinity.

Men who have an evolved, mainly bodily/visual sexuality are not “sensitive.” They’re just objective.
Anyway, even if you are a sensitive male, there’s nothing wrong with that. When a male has all senses fully operative, that male is “sensitive.” The senses developed in interaction with the multiple patterns & influences of reality.

Of the chivalrous traditions, female greed was promoted, so now female greed has been proven to desire unreal/destructive forms of novelty, as they casually get to dismiss whatever they don’t even know, because they’re too stupid to know, as “sensitive.”
Just like there is no real rape-culture (other than a minute one), there is no epidemic of domestic violence by males, but just an epidemic of hysteria about it. This was according to Massachusetts District Court Judge: Milton H. Raphaelson. Women are more prone to be interested in rape-culture & domestic violence. This proves how delusional female greed/psychology is, as they’re more willing to try the defective, & chivalrous traditions promoted female greed.
Modern man has fixed many problems of the beginnings. It is female nature that will keep promoting more stressful atmospheres. Female personality disorders is a byproduct to male modernization.

Dominance without abstractions leads to basically nothing – a repetitive cycle. The problem is “dominant” men keep reinforcing women’s cancellation of men of abstractions. Women occlude men of abstractions (even when they’re with them.) It was not dominance that constructed. It was abstractions.

Today we obviously don’t behave like wild animals or basic primates. Although this article uses a zoological model that might seem contradictory, it’s to state what gynocentrism does: that female sexuality is very archaic, occludes patient/intellectual males, & can lead to past models. We have been socialized by abstractions to make better decisions. Women have been making decisions to cheapen abstractions.

I got called “creepy,” etc., by whores who masturbate to drug-dealers & other idiots. They say: “get over it.” But the teenager years are actually the most important times of your life. This is the period when you’re actually setting your life.
Thanks to dumb whores, we have generations of losers amplifying, quite literally amplifying, their worthlessness, when they didn’t even make the formula for guitar amps, they didn’t weld the metal pieces together, yet people, especially whores, equate the same level of “skill” or “competence” thanks to the survival mechanisms of female collectivism. Getting a tattoo on your arm doesn’t make you different. It’s how you think – the abstractions, which makes patience, & women absolutely hate (or use) that, which is associated with rational/philosophical/science types.
When females use that, it’s not seriously female sexuality. It’s female practicality.

Some say: “I don’t hate women. I get sex from them. I don’t hate plumbers. I call them when I need something fixed.” Firstly, equating women with something as functional as that is just stupid. Secondly, that’s nice. However, some of us are more capable of analyzing female psychology & it’s detrimental effects. You want a cookie, or something, for being a vagina critic? There’s differences between opinions & facts, You might as well not even speak.

With most of the articles of “you’re a “beta” male”, a lot of it isn’t even pseudo science. it’s just casual garbage.

It’s not “too nice.” It’s “maybe” logic.

A woman who wants a “strong” man has desires for bad situations, which is the problem firstly.
Women know it’s taboo for women to be in a situation of being attacked, even of the abstract war. It is rare for real reasons for her to be protected. They’re also more likely to resort to tactics of gossip for revenge with other females – rarely beatings. When they say they want a “strong man to protect them,” it really just translates to them wanting to indulge with their immature sexuality.

Robert M. Sapolsky has studied free-ranging baboons in an African Reserve for stress-related diseases.
He found that subordinates to the ruthless exhibited higher relative cortisol levels – the silent killer – when they were subjected to higher rates of stressors & decreased opportunities for social support.
Dominant men use their stress, instead of patient contemplation, to dominating other men: Throwing men to go fight in a war with little pay, etc.. Society has the dynamic of men as just utilities, of which the rewards are little.

Chronic activation of the stress response is harmful. We need minimal amounts of it though.
Chronic activation can damage by various ways: healthy tissues atrophy & fatigue happens. With enough time, cardiovascular changes promote hypertension, which can damage the kidneys, the heart & blood vessels. When constructive processes are deferred indefinitely, the body pays a price of reduced fertility, susceptibility to peptic ulcers, impaired growth & tissue repair & diminished immune function.
What once helped us survive a very long time ago, when we resembled wild animals much more so, is now the scourge of our lives, which women promote, often not even realizing it.
Women basically feed off of the state of emotional lives, with the few/defective men infected with female psychology, who will even beat men of abstractions.

Women are bad with abstract thinking obviously. Most desires for protection – excuses for clumsy sexuality – is usually an irresponsible one: “Beat him for soliciting.”

Sapolsky didn’t specifically state much on female sexuality because he was busy with his zoological model, but that’s basically what it would translate to when applied to female psychology.

I’m not telling you to give free welfare checks to drug-addict losers. I’m just pointing: “grow up, kids.”



Sexual Utopia In Power by F. Roger Devlin, pg. 160-167

Stress in the Wild by Robert M. Sapolsky – Scientific American, Vol. 262, No 1 (January 1990), pg. 116

Are subordinates always stressed? a comparative analysis of rank differences in cortisol levels among primates | D.H Abbott, E.B Keverne, F.B Bercovitch, C.A Shively, S.P Mendoza, W Saltzman, Ct Snowdon, T.E Ziegler, M Banjevic, T Garland, R.M Sapolsky – sciencedirect-dot-com

Tantric Secrets For Men by Kerry Riley & Diane Riley, pg. 21 ( I do not 100% endorse all references used.)


better Hedon's sample

Notice, this article is by a colleague that I know with the single pen-name: Hedon, not myself. The reason for duplication is that original version featured nudity, which some spaces would not take. This article, not to “blow smoke up anyone’s ass,” is far too important to not read. This is one of my favorite pieces, not because of the disgusting aspects of women I have already known long before, but because of the needed confirmation. The final axiom is now – women are  postponing men by the archaic.


Human sexuality is quite complicated when you consider gamuts of things people are attracted to sexually but fortunately for us the advent of technology in rapidly changing times, in its iconoclastic fashion, has been very instrumental in illuminating sexual instincts in us which may have been too taboo or unpopular if expressed decades ago. Female hybristophilia, the female attraction to violence, has been well discussed in the MGTOW sphere. For reference, check out Bar Bar’s brilliant video on Hybristophilia (Link below). Since intelligentsia in academia, people who should have an honest scientific approach to education and exploration, are too tepid to deeply study human sexuality and explore these hard controversial topics, we are left with no other choice as thinking men than to do the job ourselves. In the words of Barbarossa, welcome to the age of crowd science, gentlemen.

Female attraction to violence, if studied closely, has been apparent for quite some time, whether it’s women’s incessant preference for the mindless brute, the bad boy, the empty “alpha male” jock, violent offenders in prison, serial killers on death row, or in their malevolent utilization of the state and the government in what could be called violence by proxy to hand out punishment to men whenever men “get out of line.” To say nothing of the effect this demented mentality is presently having on the human population, it elucidate plainly the female irrevocable nature that not only seeks chaos but is infatuated with it. The more violent and brutal the man is or seem, the more appealing and irresistible he is to the infantilized female mind. This infatuation with violence, however, has its roots in biology. Homo Sapiens would not have had such evolutionary success had gender roles not strictly defined or adhered to. In order to propagate the species in this unforgiving environment humans found themselves natural selection must select for the biggest and the powerful. The bands in hunter gather days would’ve died off had they catered to the weakest among them, namely the old and the sick. Women, even though relatively weak themselves, are blessed with the fortunate task to vessel human progenies thereby propagating the human species. However, unlike other species of animals with shorter duration of pregnancy and could birth multiple babies at once, the human female has to carry a pregnancy for 9 months of which she is completely helpless or limited, and usually could only birth 1 child at a time. Throughout this 9 months and the years beyond of which she has to nurse the baby, she’s merely a burden on the man and the foraging band. This necessitates having a man who is physically capable of providing for her, himself, and other kids during times as this. This is the way it has been throughout human history, through the hunter gather days, through the agricultural revolution, through cognitive revolution, through the industrial revolution, and so on.

However, nature smiled back at humans perhaps for the first time in human history and augment modernity with a leap so vast that human evolutionary process is unable to keep up with it. As a result, modern times, with its rich scientific and technological advancement, do not require this antiquated evolutionary process mainly because securing survival in modernity isn’t based on one’s physical acumen. Selecting for brute power is utterly useless to human evolution in modern times and its sole utilization as a deciding mating factor could only impede human progression and may soon destroy civilization. Modern civilization wasn’t brought about by the men women would typically prefer because women are anti-intellect, civilization was put into gear by the brain and the mind, by the individual men whose intellectual prowess is beyond comprehension. As much as I hate using this terms because they are demeaning to men, these aforementioned men are indeed the true “alpha males” in every sense of those words.

But you ask, why then do women’s primitive mental faculty still prefers this primitive behavior in men when modernity doesn’t require it? Well, I theorize that unlike men the female mind never truly evolved. Environmental pressure is what forces evolution; it’s what forces the human mind to carve a new pattern and new ways of thinking in order to ensure survival. Man’s mind isn’t new to such changing unpredictability of a harsh environment since they are the ones to go out and exist in it and harness it to ensure their survival. Comparatively, women are afforded the costly luxury of bypassing these environmental pressures. Since they are the weak gender nature dictates they should be catered for, by fathers, brothers, husbands, and sons, and because of this, they remain perpetual children in mind. Regression or stagnation of their mental faculty is mostly due to the absence of these environmental pressures. Evidence of this could be glimpsed from all major creation and inventions throughout history. It all happened out of the beauty of man’s mind. Men create and build civilization, women simply exist in it.

Since their primitive minds abound it is not hard to understand their infatuation with the primitive male, and the best deciding factor in selecting this trait is the male propensity for violence. To test it out, if she’s unable to accurately measure it in him any other way, she’d be willing to use herself as the subject of his provocation. She’d shit-test him to see how far she could push before he puts her in her place. If he strikes her, shows uncaring attitude towards her, give her the blue eye, stiff-arm her, beat the shit out of her, she’d love him more and more. How many times have you heard stories of domestic abuse where no matter how violent the man is with the woman, she returns to him? The more violent he is, the more primitive he is, the more she loves him. Serial killer, rapist, kidnapper Ted Bundy whose targeted group are mostly women had numerous letters in prison penned and sent by women professing their undying love for him. Imagine that – the crime of one of the most violent offenders in history not only became nothing in women’s minds at the immediate thought of this man’s propensity for violence, it became the source of their guilty pleasure. Hence the popular saying, the female knows no justice.

To get an accurate understanding of how pervasive this phenomenon of female attraction to violence is, one study that came out earlier this month done by gathering data from google search engine concludes that porn featuring violence against women is more popular among women than among men.

The popular feminist narrative would have you believe that porn is largely consumed by men, and that depictions of violent — or at least rough — sex would be a primarily male-dominated interest.

This is untrue, states researcher Seth Stephens-Davidowitz, who says that porn featuring violence against women is significantly more popular among women compared to men.

His findings might explain the popularity of the BDSM-heavy “Fifty Shades of Grey” series of novels among female readers.

Speaking to Vox in an interview about how Google data proves that most Americans lie about their sexual preferences, the researcher and author of “Everybody Lies” asserts that more women enjoy the genre compared to male porn watchers — despite common sense and politically correct claims to the contrary.

“Porn featuring violence against women is also extremely popular among women,” said the author. “It is far more popular among women than men.”

Increíble. The gender that cries and decries violence against their own watches more porn with violence against their gender than the gender they demonize as the perpetrator of violence against them. The reason the above data is more reliable than any other existing data is that Google’s data is aggregated from the search terms people uses versus self-reporting which eradicates the question of ingenuity that comes with gathering such data through surveys or random questioning. Each week, millions of users around the world search for porn featuring violence against women and most of these users are reported to be women. It’s like watching women in their natural state. You can’t get any more reliable than this and it lends credence to years of observational data on the subject. Welcome to female hybristophilia.


From what the “sad, bitter, losers, who can’t get laid” have already known long before the publicized article, Search for a recording: Hybristophilia The Female Attraction to Violence by bar bar

Google Researcher: Porn Featuring Violence Against Women Is More Popular Among Women Than Men by Ian Miles Cheon – daily-caller-dot-com

Original article: mgtowundergroundrailroad-dot-com


The Mental Rape Culture By Women | by Jessie Nagy

loser vs winner

What I find hypocritical about the far-right (I’m of the “far-up”) is that they’re always complaining about greedy corporations, yet they make no mention of their own women that are destroying their own civilization due to the similar thing, bending masculinity & pausing generative assembly negatively.

Don’t get perplexed by the imagery. This is relevant to save civilization.

Most so called beta males have no real significant/long-term contact with females, so what is the purpose of chastising them? The way to define most “alpha” male is if he’s been either married or had some period(s) with them. From the realms of health, there are MANY different types of alpha males. It’s just that women have a whore nature that constantly keeps dissecting alpha males into submerged levels. (as for myself, I’m beyond beyond being an “alpha male” because I already noticed the majority of the process.) Greater social acuity of women results with increased dissatisfaction or willingness to try more & more. That they are constantly comparing, even when they have already made it, males who are potential mates even with fictional characters is a moral failing that women have.
It’s the males I’m obviously trying to help.
You get a lot of assumptions in such spaces about how the male was just not enough of an “alpha” male, yet notice how they all allow themselves to be controlled by these continuously, ever changing levels of what would already be considered alpha males to be changed to “beta” males because of her. Here’s an idea: Concentrate on exposing women instead. (even if some males are sometimes losers.)
The “superstitious” cultures, etc., are not causing disproportion specifically because of integration, they’re creating disproportion (which wouldn’t even be considered variegation if there’s more of them) because they have a direct way, unlike your methods, of dealing with their women.
Further, if you’re busy trying to be an “alpha male,” there’s no way you know that much.
Of course, there’s the obvious guys on welfare, drug dealers, etc., that would be considered “beta males,” but aside from that, you’re either exposing or you’re reinforcing of them. Reinforcing only masks the bad tendencies of females, which triggers more future disasters. It’s only a quick-fix that doesn’t address causes.

I don’t care about zoological reports of wolf packs that have very little resemblance to men. It is a cop-out veiled by sophistication, much like the reinforcement.

Democracy is for the will of the majority. Since women have been monopolizing their desires based on constant comparisons with subjective fantasies, their dreams are forced.

Of other cultures not of the West, what is called rape-culture because they have more control of their women is not actually considered rape-culture by most of their own women because women are flexible. Women are malleable. It’s only because women are allowed access to things like social media that they are exposed to & inflate their opinions. If you were to give those same women of those opinions that “rape culture,” those women would be mostly fine with it. This is why I defend the so called “rape culture” to be implemented further: it saves males from the much worse mental rape culture done to them by women, & since males are creatures much more of the mind to bring vision to society, they need to guard themselves from being mentally raped by women. They might call it rape-culture. I call it education.

The reason this same pattern persists is because males are busy making themselves “alpha males.” They could save themselves if they gained knowledge/real power first, then monopolize themselves.

70% of divorces are started by women, though some are estimated to be 90% when including force by women.
Aftermath: women are entitled with the help of the state – the impulsive alpha males lacking wisdom & consciousness that women want – to steal prizes & mass quantities of money from mostly oblivious victims. This is why female sexuality needs to be illegal – “alpha males” create a very negative atmosphere, but, since females basically own the legal collective, legal ramifications are not going to happen any time soon, so males need to start dehumanizing female sexuality on a personal level.
There’s a real mental-rape culture. There’s no exaggeration: There was a process of some amount of pleasure, being taken advantage of, then confusion & a state of being broken.
Women are subtracting, but I don’t mean that of the obvious way. After the state of realism by learning from experience, although some of them are too stupid to even learn with experience – the apathetic, (mentally) experienced, mature men who don’t look fun, or whatever, are called “beta” males.
Newton was a “beta” male. Being one is actually a good thing. That’s right; you read correctly. You’re supposed to be a “beta” male, but concepts of alpha & beta need to be revamped.

I already knew this even when I was a kid, so why would I want to be an “alpha male.” Any man who wants to aspire to be an “alpha male” is a desperate fool with little self-respect or is just stupid. The hatred, not “alpha male” aspiration, of women will help start the true power of masculinity. “Oh, no, he applied some kind of sane mentality derived from objective reasoning – how awful.”

Not only do whores have the mentality that “she’s getting someone other’s trash” if a whore ruins a male, females have also been reported to be much more likely to do the same trends of divorce, etc., if other female associates do it because of female collectivism. The exact statistic is 75%, 33% if it’s a distant female associate. This is exactly what I’ve typed about before: that if one female peer doesn’t like the way you scratch your ear, or something like that, they all suddenly don’t like you because that one whore thought it was ‘creepy.” It really is that low. How can you not be a misogynist?
Most of those men like Neuton – beta males – would be considered “creepy”, or a related description, to women. They say “square” science types like it’s a bad thing.
If this female collectivism has been proven scientifically, as I just did, which is also why it frees us from having to rely on citations regarding female actions – easier to know what they’re prone to doing just by self referencing observation, how can you state that women & Feminists are that much different?
They like to casually dismiss the intelligent, aware (“beta”) males as “just like the Feminists,” but we actually have a capability of understanding a real mentally raped experience, while women’s victim-states are mostly contrived & lacking logic.
One of the most extreme cases: Female greed & mental disorders was disclosed by feminist Wendy Davis who, after convincing her older “daddy,” as they say, to have his retirement money used for her expensive Harvard degrees, she abandoned her, with children that weren’t even his, parental obligation to him after divorcing him & started her career as “victim”/feminist politics, when she just stabbed-him-in-the-back.
It might not be that extreme when dealing with general cases, but most women are prone to doing some variation of that.



Smart & Sexy by Roderick Kaine, pg.: 214, 215

Brinig, Margaret F. and Allen, Douglas W., ‘These Boots Are Made for Walking’: Why Most Divorce Filers are Women (2000). American Law and Economics Review, Vol. 2, pp. 126-169, 2000

Bond, R., Smith P.B.(1996) line Judgement Task. Psychological Bulletin. 1996. Vol. 119 No. 1, 111-137.

McDermott, R., Fowler, J.H., Christakis, N.A.. (2009) Breaking Up Is Hard To Do, Unless Everyone Else Is Doing It Too: Social Network Effects on Divorce in a longitudinal Sample (October 18, 2009).

Grall, T.S. (2011) Custodial Mothers and Fathers and Their and their Child support: 2009. United States Census Bureau.

Females Hate Intellectual Males (Or Are Indifferent) | by Jessie Nagy


NOTICE! Citations, as usual, on end to stop “pseudo science” slander.

These fucking aesthetes – they can’t create anything meaningful.

Intelligent males develop preferences for hyper-systematized tinkering, which is not seriously feasible to social dynamics owned by females, other than superficially  sometimes. As a result of that, As females have a scattered psychology lacking depth with diffusive, alternating interests to the point of consuming & discarding, while males have much more focused, even repetitive, interests, with focused interests meaning increase of detail & strong, firm, substantial structures, females are prone to, as they hate the different, slandering intelligent males.
You learn most of those compulsive aspects from the maternal: “Smile for the camera so you don’t embarrass me, instead of actually looking respectable by looking serious,” etc..

We keep getting robbed & mentally raped by women.

Women, themselves, love con-artists because they love to have a mirror in front of them.

Real-men are neither dominant nor passive; they’re “robotic.”
Females constantly misdiagnose intelligent males as “disordered,” etc..
Due to the inherent inconsistent nature of female psychology & the social settings to that, it is virtually impossible (except with the advent of mass information.) to apply systematizing reasoning to female centrism. Female psychology is frequently unlawful or it is of such bad integrity that it is incapable for systematic minds to align to.
There is no set formula of female psychology, except as a function to maintain the species, which females often don’t even abide by very well, other than that it is an equation that defines the internal female psychology as inconsistent.
This makes the large bulk of popular psychology, the social “sciences,” etc. as not real science for failing to admit the amoral female psychology.
Autists are popularly thought of as having low intelligence & other incompetent traits. As a result of ascertainment bias – having low IQ as being the main trigger for being tested by specialists, it is often how the autism is defined as incompetent levels.
As intelligent males with standards of their own have been casually deflected, often by females, as having something “wrong” with them, this is the real science: Autism spectrum conditions are a result of extremely high concentrations of testosterone during fetal development, also known as: “the extreme male brain.” The correlation to that is that females can’t be equal to EVEN MALES WITH MODERATE testosterone levels, so to even take female narratives seriously, not just as Feminism, but most female narratives, leads to disaster.
The reason that the humanities department of professional academia is littered with weak & fake science is because social interactions have been normalized by the adjunct of EQ & related.

Women want to seem better than they really are, won’t admit to their amorality, which is how they’ve used “alpha or beta” to deflect what they’ve done: “You got betrayed or had your time wasted by a women. Oh, you’re a “beta” male.”

“Turning the other cheek” can be a good principle because it gives you more time to consider your next choice.

Most of the time when it’s stated: “You have to learn from experience,” they’re not really learning; they’re mostly adapting to inconsistency.

Christopher Walker – nutrition expert of Anabolic-Men – is by definition “nerdy:” He’s an expert & he’s very systematic. But does he look like a “nerd”? No, he doesn’t. That’s the point: there is no “nerdy” look.
Since these definitions of “nerds” are completely archetypal, the whole concept of a “nerd’ from the casual culture means basically nothing.
Don’t even take the concept of a “nerd” seriously because it’s going to bring all this comedy/distractions, when, set by the feminine, the reality is is that women hate intellectual males.
“But Sartre was fucking Simone De Beauvoir.” Firstly, S.D.B. was fucking disgusting, secondly, Sartre was not a true intellectual: He had immature optimist/nihilistic/”Machiavellian” tendencies, so, of course, that would garner him a whore.

Sexual retards, female sexuality, with all the amorality, is hailed to be “fine.” opponents of it are decried as “prudish.”
Even the conforming of sex education to patterns of behavior divorced from morality is one of the things that encourages naive sexual habits.
Since sex/flirting, thanks to the delusional Feminine, is mostly amoral/”impulsive,” the application to it is also mostly amoral/”impulsive,” evident with broken families, popular psychology, discharged males, facades, etc.
The notion that sex to the female is about a larger relational & moral context is an obvious scam. Female sexuality is pursued as recreation with, what they describe as, pan-sexuality, & perennial comparisons.
Males don’t have that pan-sexuality: It’s directly her, evidenced by the description of males having a “one track mind” – muse stimulation.

Pornography didn’t ruin the family unit. As women are avaricious for delusional fantasies, men went to pornography because of women. Women ruined the family unit, so men have pornography.
I don’t need to answer to a plea for citations on those statistics. That female psychology: They think: if they can’t see it in front of them, it “doesn’t” exist. It only proves the materialism, hence how women ruin relationships: It’s because they’re superficial.
Even a study by Scott Robbins: ‘Our Sexual Future With Robots,’ claimed that, even with the human prostitute industry, a significant number of male clients, even though the relationship was a financial one, many of the clients still want the pretense of a genuine relationship.
What do females call that? They call it “needy,” “desperate,” etc.

“Nerds” don’t really exist. It’s just a cheapening, humoring caricature for intellectual males (or what can be called the “nice-guy”). They might not say it explicitly, but it’s a way for them to insist that we’re “creepy,” “losers,” etc..
When males have the time, money, etc. to consume lame trends, wouldn’t you think there’s something missing in their life? The price for monumental intellectualism is a loss of being appealing.
“Nerds” don’t care about trends, other than an analytical one, & because they’re not apart of feminine trends, that’s how you even get the small trend – I’m not sure if it still is – of young women even wearing fake glasses with plastic lenses – a projection of their mentality – due to social media presenting some amount of intellectual males that females haven’t experienced. I will admit that females who wear glasses look pretty sexy because os some glossy look & my face fetish, but do you think that’s going to make you look like you’re on my level, or something like that, as they parrot something they heard that the president did on the news? The only way to identify an intellectual male is in the abstractions.
Whenever I’ve told females that I, relaxed, like to tongue kiss her when she’s sitting right in front of me – reversed on a “chair” position, they almost always assume that I like her to be, what they call as her, “being on top,” which has a different meaning to them than a meaning of placement. No. the reason is because I like the sensation of having handfuls of her juicy thighs & buttocks right in front of me while enjoying her face, almost like riding a motor-bike with her buttocks as “handlebars.” This is exactly what I mean: their interpretations are slanderous.

Intelligent males are often already bored with their “bullshit,” as they would say, when the popular can’t even realize how lame they are.
If females, & gynocentrism as an adjunct to females, constantly misdiagnose intelligent males, as females also masturbate to mythical mutants, what makes you think the inaccurate definitions stop only when directly dealing with them?
Even in pro-male spaces we get a very wrong definition: hypergamy. The way it’s used has little relevance to an American context. The origins of that was assignment of females to successful males in India. The original hypergamy kept those aspects of female nature latent. It’s transient in America though.
The men who originally invented hypergamy did not do it by a result of “domination,” like the mythical mutants that females masturbate to, or intensity, or whatever females call it now, as their inconsistency fluctuates. It was a result of calculation.

Growing with Asperger’s, or something mild like that, you’re criticized badly that you’re rigid for being observational with a linear honesty/ try to become “alpha”, etc., then they give you some little bumper-sticker quote just to hear themselves talk “Honesty is the best policy,” “Stay true to yourself.” – feminine inconsistency.



Smart & SeXy by Roderick Kaine, pgs.: 88 ,89, 93, 95.

Our Sexual Future With Robots by Noel Sharkey, Aimee van Wynsberghe, Scott Robbins, Eleanor Hancock, pg 17

What Comes After Postmodernism? | by Jessie Nagy

better one for postmodern article

NOTICE: My articles contain an authenticity without emphasis on perfect syntax, specifically for the purpose of others not slandering me with one of the most common ones – that “I copy-&-paste,” among other slanderous claims. Aside from the occasional syntax error, it’s always fact checked multiple times with references. (except for the more metaphysical ones.)

Whenever you have females/Feminists, especially the redundant artistic kind, try to portray “masculinist” males as the “bad” ones, especially when they do it with slanderous presumptions that have little to do with it, it’s because they actually have a fascination with fashionable brutes, the pointless, delinquents, swindlers, etc.

They have an impulsive nature that’s extremely disrespectful of masculinity. That’s how we even got various forms of postmodernism & related.
Women will even ruin what a male has built, wasting time, if just one of her friend’s impulsively cheapens the value of him based on some superficial opinions, &, yet, according to the dominant culture, misogyny is “wrong.”

1-or-0/yes-or-no – binary logic is something you depend on. Without it, you can’t have a so much as a single means of learning.

Women are short-sighted. With the info-age, the non-casual males have influence. A lot of women are noticing, thinking: “Oh, my god, there’s all of these males out here that we never knew existed.” Their short-sight was fixated on the postmodern/spontaneous/resigned/emulative/aggressive. Rather than accepting that they’re short-sighted though, they use the easy deflection of: “You can’t find these losers much elsewhere, other than libraries, etc..”
The compiled info. has been disseminated because men, like myself, were not swayed by whims of women, as females were implying over the years: “C’mon, give in to the amorality.” I’ll never join the feminine. I’ll have & use them, but never change drastically for them. Because other men don’t understand how you could be better than her, they say it’s “gay,” or something.

I just recently saw a short lecture of Camille Paglia , &, no, I’m not going to refer a source of it because there’s already enough of these “bipolar’ female m.r.a. types, or whatever they call themselves, infecting the spaces. She was talking about how there’s a lack of Testosterone in music today. This cunt didn’t get it: That commentary is just anti-male: She shuns many facets of male experience. There’s more to masculinity than just a “T factory.” It’s just like when Feminists & the related say that men’s rights activists are just “complainers.” Don’t take any of these female m.r.a. types seriously.
With that female tendency of not realizing masculine multi-personalities, it’s obvious women are the ones who do the severe objectifying.
&, anyway, rock-n-roll, whatever supposed music with “Testosterone,” comes from degenerate culture. It’s no wonder you have that woman trying to interject something so stupid.
When children are in that record phase, they’re not seriously interpreting those words. It’s more absorbing.
With that kind of mentality that males are “not” supposed to be complex by the feminine, it leads to disastrous relationships later.

Time & time again women not doing their proper function proves to be a disruptive influence. It’s no surprise why many try celibacy.

Paul Elam discussed with a popular news source, which they never produced fully on television because it was “too ideological,” or whatever, so I watched a shortened boot-legged version of it. I’m not providing citations because there’s already more than enough moderate/mediocre m.r.a. spaces, with most claiming that “extremists” are “too disgruntled” to investigate the actual quality content, that it discloses itself to be much too contaminated by female m.r.a.s. Get your own citations. He defends himself with logic, & you can understand that the female interviewer obviously despises him. Why is that? It’s because his facial expression/body language is in a defensive mode, he’s showing his realistic/multiple side, rather than just “T. factory” for women’s one-track mind, so by that, there’s the pattern of women’s delusions already dismissing him as “pathetic”/”too nice”/creepy, etc.. They portrayed his logic as “the bad guy.”
She actually had another interview with EL James to discuss “slaughterhouse porn”/female literature – the hypocrisy of female nature.

Even male amorality is different. Some male amorality is due to desperation – desperate for beer, or whatever. Female amorality is completely different. They find bad situations exciting or they can’t make serious moral judgements.

Metaphysical lore, with no citations needed because it’s metaphysical, obvious symbols, regards shiva as the pure masculine force culminating in cosmic consciousness – male awareness, & Shakti as the feminine principle embodying pure creative energy – pollution by “impulse.”
With the original calm composure of masculinity being awareness, it’s no wonder how women degrade masculinity.

Aside from the fake “sophisticated women,” most women I’ve met don’t even have a shred of that supposed elegant femininity that male enablers talk about to put blame back on other males when those male enablers sense a problem that women chose. Most of female collectivism is like masculine nasty “pieces of fecal matter”: They talk like casual idiots who “don’t wipe themselves properly” & tattooed losers, or something like that.
Nature doesn’t care about justice. To maintain, because women are much more in tuned & less capable of controlling nature – controlled by primal nature, that they are “elegant” creatures is a pretense.
Women do not love men the same way men love women. It’s why women disregard a long term relationship so much easier than men – because they were never that psychologically invested firstly.
As I typed with my previous article, egalitarianism doesn’t work. Women start taking advantage: As the system increases feminizing, with female egos expressed, they start to think that Dave at accounting is “nothing.”

“Discrimination against women is wrong. Discrimination against men is equal opportunity.”

Postmodernity, etc. does not regard authority as teachers, but to be defied. “Solipsistic” thinking is a trait of unintelligent, naive, males of the initial interest of females, when they impose their lack of wisdom & can’t take instructions.
Because they’re all related, the greedy normal people, postmodernists, the p.c., female defenders are just as much your enemy as Feminists.

I will admit that female sexual capacity is stronger than male. Of course, it’s probably because they’re wired to give birth. But that sexual strength combined with their delusion & a willingness to denounce male logic leads to disaster because that delusional subjectivity also wants & expects males to come to that level, which only causes the male to become sloppy, & I don’t really mean that as sweaty/sloppy/really good swampy sex. Concepts, especially Western, of the “battle of the sexes” conveys the morbidity & frustration of the ponderously serious sexual dramas which dominate so much of the thinking of relationships, or the other unhealthy alternative to that is female collectivism. It has little to do with transforming aspects of relationships.
Women prioritize the physical over the mental. They over-emphasize physical sex, get stuck on that kind of pleasure without experiencing higher subtle energies.
Most women have “sex.” However, I have S.E.X. – Subtle Energetic eXchange, which requires that the female “shuts the fuck up,” of course, metaphorically because I love verbal eroticism, & engages my exploration of her as a muse. Most girls I’ve been with are not that impressive with sex, yet the majority of them like to congratulate themselves as “(s)experts.” They profess to know so much with major egos, yet they can’t even realize that when a male is tellingly expressing himself to her, it’s not “too nice,” or whatever else they’ll claim/imply it is, it’s individuation – he’s aligned with what he is.
Males that don’t have an intellectual cooperation, even the most simple principles, should not be allowed a female. Yes, I used the word cooperation. that doesn’t make me a “leftist.” Did you know that such factions have, both, a dualistic atheistic, predatory manipulation, as well as a blending, mediocre, mystical notions of democracy?

What they call “asserting” oneself for women has made the male to have cheapened his personality. Without the real personality assertion, spontaneity, political gain, “stamina” has been sought. The mentality has even made sex, especially in America, into a disposable commodity, making it harder in our private lives to experience sex as a cultivation over time. Today sex is often consumed & discarded as soon as he becomes old or an inconvenience.

The reason I don’t believe in things like legalizing prostitution the way it’s usually debated about is that if there was an understanding of the oxytocin exchange on the male’s terms, you wouldn’t have things as the city of Amsterdam’s vices. The interesting thing about it is also that, since living there causes the exotic to collapse under the weight of ordinariness – making them apathetic/jaded, it actually cheapens the fact that males could monopolize themselves beyond torpidity & female/incoherent usury.
My father works in Travel. He told me the city is literally filthy. ( When I type things like this, it’s usually interpreted from the projections that I’m sensitive. They’re the ones obsessed with naive sensations because they can’t take realism. I type about it by the point of: How can I even take it seriously?) When men don’t monopolize their cravings on their own set terms, it leads to feminine novelty & vices of pollution.
Seeking freedom in Amsterdam, with the cannabis-cafes, etc., leads to experiences that aren’t seriously effective.
This is the psychology of the typical postmodernist & normal person. They think that sensory experiences entailing naive freedom means having more “wisdom.”
You have to get back to the organic & discipline.
It must be nice to not have to even try to make real points, just rely on: “I’ve been to that attraction.”
The individuation of Amsterdam is not real.
It’s paradoxical that all these casual idiots, as they revolve the majority of their time with entertainment, etc., which doesn’t require or make serious thinking, with their stupid opinions that aren’t even based on reality, tend to, & you can notice this now, all of a sudden, as every fucking idiot with a smart-phone has, etc., think they know more than serious philosophers who actually employed much more mental effort.

Baruch Spinoza is looked to as a guide by people who grapple on the basis of the subjective. I’m not going to have an issue of semantics of what objective & subjective is. By what is given with the other points of this article, you know what I mean by subjective.
If it seems too sophisticated, think: anarchists, “beatniks”, “jail-birds,” charlatans, & “hustlers” – very accurately, life-styles: they’re only styles, not different.

Don’t think of me as politically right-wing either though. As I’ve typed, I’m not of the (alt) right nor left. I’m “going up.” Both left & right are religiously habituated with routines.

For a society favoring what they envision as being tough for adventure to get things done, all that gets done is indulgence, They don’t have the real creative means of science, which allows for something essential to be produced: our understanding of reality is more coherent, & society is furthered because of science.

Greed has little concept of right & wrong. It mostly recognizes what is profitable & what you can get away with. When you have government, the Media, the military, & police on your payroll, you can do pretty much whatever.
A lot of anxiety & depression is used to discredit those experiencing reality, & it enables pharma to get more money.
Professional medicine often causes more chaos & more illness than total cure: It has paused knowledge about keeping themselves healthy firstly, a knowledge that would decrease the production of the chemical & drug industry, which has a stake in disrupting natural healing methods. How else could they sell so many chemicals?
When a derivative of female-hood – Princess-Worthless – was “chillin it & killin it,” waiting for her “knight in shining armor,” as she was spending daddy’s lunch-money on “poppers”, she got psychiatric problems, & now daddy is spending even more on her, when, if she didn’t have a monopoly on postmodernism, etc., firstly, there would’ve been enough masculine foundations to stop her craving.

In a city like Amsterdam, where the theology is of herd-entertainment with vigorous greed, making money on fake “differentness,” the result is a culture of immaturity. The culture reeks of preadolescents, like sexual retards, when first turning 21, rushing to the liquor store because of the over-hype. Rational intellectuals have already had the conclusion or mental experiences, so they don’t need to try it.

Women manufacture “creeps” because they hate the truly different. Barely conscious of their own actions, they call males that they’ve damaged to be “creepy.” That callous, immature treatment of the different, with the occasional use of the different because women operate by what benefits them on a given period – as soon as they find another situation that benefits them, they switch their act, has ordained society to interpret logic from an surface/image-bank.
Moral depravity, parasitism, predatory nature – it’s understood that these are often degrees of female psychology, especially towards the latter years as traps, yet, why stop there?
The religion that consists of a materialist commercialism & survival/libido mechanism, like snakes eating their own progeny, feature the same manipulation, moral depravity, parasitism & predation.
Yeah, women can write “morality” on paper with some attractive language. It doesn’t mean it’s true, or that I’ll be tricked by that “bipolar” tendency.
Bad psychiatry is just like women calling a man collecting very stern classical records “creepy” after he got mentally raped by a whore. It’s not only deflective, it’s also disrespectful. It keeps women’s nature to not be addressed. How “creepy” it is for a man to show multi layers of his personality.

Disgusting how these whores become pseudo intellectuals when some of these aspects about them is disclosed to the public. They want to give “advice” about how to be on her level.
Don’t even take her bad advice seriously. By being proper, honest, etc. – by not being like them, we can show women’s true sides to the masses.
By her own barely conscious confession of the following two quotes of female collectivism, women seek unstable men. The main reason women usually pick a stable man is because of his resources, not because of “love.”
seconf part of proof of female personality disorders

more proof by whore

Women are obsessed with socializing, actually, collectivism – they’re very socially incompetent, not because “they’re friendly.” Their obsession with it is because of the apposite of friendliness. It’s due to an aspect of their hybristophilia. It’s because they like being reassured that they can maintain perennial comparisons.: “Oh, that guys louder than the last guy. I’ll go with him until the next.”more proof of female evil

Based on binary, simple logic, you know that women are prone to collectivism. Therefore, those tendencies, as screen-captured, is evident of most of female nature.

What’s interesting is that evolution is defined less of terms of abstractions by the male intellect/male patience than survival mechanisms determined by the feminine. The newer, interesting ideas & plans are considered less relevant than appetite & its source – an idiotic & dangerous error shielded from exposure only by the past drives, assumptions based on that, & the confinement of alienating social “networks”/collectivism.


Not Of The Alt-Right. I’m Of The “Alt-Up” | by Jessie Nagy


The reason I don’t care about women’s side of the story is that women have been the ones basically apathetic & even laughing to male experience & trial & error, yet all of a sudden, when memetics is gaining some amount of a.d.d. induced popularity, you have whores who magically concern themselves on some diluted level.

With the question often by the political of whether we’ve become Machiavellian with the materialism & carelessness/nihilism of the dominant culture, similarly, my question is from the psychological point: Has the society become feminine? The answer is yes.
The fact that the casual is ignorant & uncaring about these enormous feminine tendencies is proof they’re ordained by the feminine.
The amorality that is required to be glamorized is portrayed as developed by “tough-minded” people.

When you could ask “sally to get a shake,” there was a little bit more option for the male to actually discern what he was investing his time with.
The excess now given to female-centrism of speed-dating culture makes them bored, agitated, etc., when they see the slightest little thing. Women’s ideals of courtship are false, & their inconsistency is increasingly being disclosed.
We don’t really have the experience of friendship. Girl-friend & boy-friend is false terminology because women view men the way as consumerism products: “So I met this super-popular guy on a dating site that I was using to advertise my cam-whore profile. He told me that his ex-girlfriend dumped him. I’m not getting another’s “trash,” so I blocked him on Twatter.”
Patience is gone. Development is gone. Building a “visualization” for the male to have it become real is devalued.
The generations of texting retards has it that if someone makes one little mistake, it’s next swipe. That’s the way female psychology is. Masculine technology has given us evidence of female psychology that is the most blatant.

As female greed is starting to show their delusions & agitation, angry women make men have torpor. Male torpor makes women angry. You know what you get in return, as a male, for your efforts? Practically nothing.
There’s nothing wrong with you as a male for being calculating. They’re basically eliminating masculinity.

Of course, believing that Feminism is wrong, one of the things that I’ve gained is that I can understand the world by the objective/masculine point, women have the other view, & when I say view, I really do define it by seeing & judging by limiting surfaces, such as when a baby sees a dark shadow, or something like that, it gets scared, but when you get older, you realize that it’s silly to get scared about things like that, yet female psychology is not that much different from that, & now with what was typed with the previous paragraph, it’s extremely obvious of how they interpret reality with total inconsistency & subjectivity.

People don’t comprehend & I’ve been taken out of context, so I need to reiterate:
Now “Mama Gyps Tatwa,” or some rediculous nick-name, has 10 kids with 5 mystery fathers. While she’s looking for another partner-in-crime to help her “indie” business of selling marijuana, while collecting welfare, Goldie-locks is looking for “Mr. Unreal” – owns three fancy buffets, walks with a peg-leg, like a pirate, has a scar on his left eye-area, & also owns a dungeon.
Since they will not give you serious answers, & good communication is seen as “weakness,” etc., to women, ordaining you to postmodernism, this is the answer of what they want: “I love a man who’s been hardened by a hard life” – abused masculinity: that’s what women are attracted to, or the other one is: “I love a man that can entertain me.” – not firm or independent.
If women had also never incentivized so much novelty, northern/western society, which featured much more chivalry, which turns into female greed, they could’ve concentrated their own throughout history to the mass that abundance of eastern societies have.

Getting sex isn’t a serious mark of being true.
It’s going to take a lot of excessive effort because it’s against the level of savage thinking & ad hominems.
They’re the ones consuming escapism. Cognitive dissonance/delusion (such as asking for citations, which there are many on end) is a major factor of various personality disorders. It’s obvious of the casual nature of some who would defend various histrionic personality disorders just because of excitement or a desire for social bonding. The inability to even realize the obviousness of the cruelty of that thought process by denouncing another as “normal”/boring, etc. (possibly useful), just proves how feminine you are, even if you are a man. Real men have extreme,dogmatic, fanatical, fundamentalist morals.
Viruses are spread by contamination. Gynocentrism is a mental disease, especially becoming an “alpha” male, which puts one in a state of perpetual naivety.

Purist male Buddhist priests – hard-line moralists, preaching mindfulness/subdued instincts, no emphasis on fashionable popularity contests for the male, compassion – have realized that women, who are deeply sinful, cannot, unless they are reborn as male, attain Buddhahood, which is the realization that much of prior sensory experience is similar to hogs rolling in dung.

Being amoral, dramatic, etc. – all easy. Being moral – that’s the hard thing.

With identity & name removed so that I don’t have to deal with whores claiming I do “internet bullying”, etc., look at that disgusting title-picture, which is actually bullying, of proof of female psychology I found. It was from a Lesbian pick-up-artist group that I have spied on.
I know, there’s immature women out there, but the “sophisticated” women are just doing a different rendition.
The key to experiments is it needs to be repeated: If you’ve experienced female behavioral universals multiple times, you can discern there are patterns: Scientific controls work that way as well: With female collectivism – most women are extremely similar, which is why you don’t need pretentious degrees to make axioms about their actions, you have “diplomatic” women with lesbians.
Females have the idea that in order for something to be good, it “needs” to be identical. The mature realization is that you can have quality, but quality because the differences compliment each other. Female collectivism doesn’t work. It’s a tried & primitive thing. Women can’t even maintain that ideal of identical society anyway. That mentality leads to social incompetence, as they can’t take reality, they go to gossip about all the differences of others when those others are not there.
I remember my last girlfriend had her collective hating me because I was truely different – not different “trademark harcuts,” but REAL difference. They all didn’t like that she was betraying the feminine collective.
With the effeminate “Mtv.” generation, they have ownership of really stupid routines.I guarantee you, that the guy she abuses like that probably got anxiety from experimenting with marijuana. While people think it’s a great drug, marijuana increasingly makes it difficult for one to be capable of dealing with even basic situations.
According to a study of the open access journal PLOS ONE by Shashwatch Meda, college students who consume medium-to-high levels of marijuana & alcohol have a consistently lower GPA, but, hey, you know, it’s alright when you’re given courses that aren’t even a real sign of intelligence, like art-school. (Sarcasm.) If you haven’t noticed, I absolutely despise MOST art-students.
As the artistic influences are introducing marijuana, claiming ownership of lamer forms of entertainment anyway, which makes them not even smart enough to know how to experiment, it actually is associated with an increase of physical violence in relationships & general problems among young people, according to a study published in Drug and Alcohol Dependence. Studies resulted with associations strongest by females.
If I were that guy, I would’ve schooled that whore & had her running to another guy to try to beat me, to which I would traumatize intellectually. I don’t need to physically attack anyone, I can scold them & have them “crying to mommy.” I’m not necessarily defending that guy who is a part of stupidity, but knowing the wrong communication & tactics of women, he’s probably been subdued by some kind of feminine forces.
There’s even a reversed meme that realistically “calling out”, as they would say, constitutes as being p.c.. But p.c. is actually when you don’t judge realistically.

Male enemies of women can still be desired because of women’s instinct to try to hoard as much power as possible with almost all costs.

I’ve been slandered so many times: From “low-status degenerate who takes the pogo-stick to welfare,” to “liar,” & much more. I remember this fucking bitch slandered me as “trashy,” without even knowing me, because I was gaining some amount of focus from others, while she was with a sleazy drug-dealer. It’s because of that perennial comparison that women do with the female herd, as they get together to gossip, etc.. Last whore I was with ended it abruptly because her female associates, without even knowing me, claimed that I was “creepy.” They say that conspiracies are just “paranoid theories by losers,” but conspiring is just a trait of mammalian societies, from micro to macro. What they do isn’t bullying of the way it is commonly thought, but they do get together & use some kind of force against others.

I remember when I started meditating. It’s just a technique – a mental exercise. When I became a lot more mellow when doing this, I noticed all the women around me got so agitated by me really easily.

There is that general pattern happening when a self respecting male can’t take something stupid seriously to be slandered by women as a “loser.”

Simplicity & exaggeration of sentiments of crowds result with women’s extremes. A suspicion transforms itself as soon as announced into incontrovertible evidence.

They don’t realize that alphas get ruined also. What’s even the point of distinguishing male levels? The divorce industry indicates an analysis of men who were, by definition, successful. Why is there a 75% divorce rate by women? Personality disorders & delusions is just in a woman’s nature.

Men generally have a basic instinct to defend women. I don’t really have that because I’m in total control of my biology. I have absolutely no hypocritical tendencies because I abide by being hard-line. The reason that is is that men have the capability of being moral, which women lack.
To maintain such contradictions in one’s mind, most common of the feminine, is pathological. It is a pathological response of a crowd.

The feminine champions women’s rights & gay rights, but ignores the mistreatment of women & gays of policies of the exotic for some fake gesture. They glorify negative complications for good-person badges, yet they oppose different, complex thoughts.

There’s a theory that angry foreigners are so because they “can’t get laid.” The fanatics of those other cultures have very, very strict rules of sex: celibacy, as well as total ownership of women. I think the anger is due to completely different politics.

Androcentrism is not “reversed sex roles.” It’s reversed worship, for a lack of a better description.
Choosing gynocentrism over heterosexual androcentrism makes you reject order & the moral terms over her.

Allowing females to exercise their collectivism weakens masculinity, as they are greedy for novelty, etc., they will get together for perennial comparisons & political gossip. By disrupting the social collective of femininity, real power is given to males. The first target is popular entertainment.
The so called home-maker evolves to homewrecker for scheming to upgrade incessantly.

Get rid of the old system & rebuild something new. We know right & wrong for the most part. Morality is subjected to the passions though, & that’s why you need education. Androcentrism is the juncture of both order & passions.

The “mother’s intuition” – a silly statement. What it translates to is that “truth” is the opinion of the popular. There are many fronts for appetite with fake order.
A study published in Human Ethology Bulletin found that men concluded sexual flirtations by women as the most effective. Women thought flirtations that represented commitment & exclusivity as most effective. Men already have their minds made of the beginning that women create major traps, hence why they prefer non-committed flirting. So much for the idea of female intuition having “more wisdom” with their level of baby reading.
The Journal of Sex Research gathered that it is common for young women to persuade their partners to have sex without a condom. Sarcasm: Yeah, really good intuition. They used, obviously, seduction & risk reassurance.
Women have a tendency to gather information about a male to report & gossip back with their female consensus, while convincing males that he is “significant” to her.
Males have much more wisdom & better facts than females.

The one who gave theory of relativity also was “infected” by politics, as he was associated with political factions,the Atom Bomb was created.
Politics is not science. Politics should have no business in science. Politics is feminine. It’s done numerously by males, but mostly for showing themselves as “alpha” males. That’s right; I typed it.
The men who didn’t care about the game aren’t even safe from the “scorched earth” tendencies of women. To get to the ranks of the small percentage of masculinity that women see, you have to basically lose some levels of sanity.
There isn’t a balance. Women are often complaining about “dating down” & don’t even realize what’s happening. This is how it happens: As the ranks of the greedy gets increasingly smaller & smaller, women become even more unrealistic. Women’s further liberation, especially with pretentious degrees inflating their egos, has made them have smaller chance of getting a man who cares about her delusional ego as much as she does. Of other words. If you put a woman in a position of a president of a company, she’s not going to seriously get a man because she’s now looking for something with less probability. As more & more women are liberated, the value of masculinity is cheapened. Yes, that means: when you allow a woman to be directer of fashion-blogging, or something, she’s going to think that the automobile dealer is “nothing.”
Further, by the time males get to the increasingly narrowing top, as they lose more sanity, they’re not likely going to want to dedicate it to one. All that hard work, they’ll want to enjoy their fruits.

I actually got saved. If I would’ve gotten married, etc., although not necessarily the exact same thing, I would’ve been relegated to the similar situation I noticed my father did: he was an alpha male who was the leader of the operation. His wife got annoyed by him, called him a “wuss,” then got a large some of his assets in the divorce industry, which is enhanced by the feminine. Now, I have a new thing I have to save myself from, & it’s YOUR JOB to help other males from the very real traps of women:
You’re punishment from women for not even caring about the game & just wanting to be a waiter at a food-place will eventually be replaced by a similar process of a new invention used by greedy corporations of an automated type of waiter because the narrowed top enhanced by femininity turns you into a psychopath, or docile idiot. How can you not understand that women are the enemy?
It’s a mental illness due to the feminine because jealousy/popularity is intrinsic of the feminine: to be a partner in crime with another is her fantasy. Women are actually MORE competitive than men are, but their competition is not set by the mental intricacies. It’s like a football player pushing away all the others coming near. But the “pushing” by whores is it’s all those other men she’s with to have as a means to an end. What’s the end? Well there is no real end to a woman because that would require some amount of moralistic thought/consistency.
Thanks, women, for exercising your belief in some unrealistic masculinity, which has caused society to miss the men who are already perfectly healthy, & has caused dysfunction posed as “discipline.”

It’s largely a money racket.
A vast majority are actually too stupid to even be indoctrinated, so what’s the next level?
The education system indoctrinates youth for relative nonsense consisting of occasional truths.
The vast majority of the professoriate are a-scientific, anti-science, or incompletely scientific – repressive. It is a fact.

I’m tired of the infantile sexuality of the culture advising me. The true methods of sexuality is a “painfully,” literal “mechanical” one, which would make the normal culture thinking: “who the fuck talks like that?” Being a “dork,” as they would say, is a good thing. It’s what you’re supposed to try to become.

There are major professionals teaching to generations that there is no Truth. (You got to be joking me.) They claim that there is no good & evil, right & wrong. It’s such an easy fad for even aging guys keeping themselves as non mechanical as possible to not be seen as “awkward.”

Narratives are maintained by idiots who have, with their fake virtues, a wrong understanding of reality by the “experience” of liking things & products, & they have complexes that sharing opinions with others makes them qualified – barely any mental experiences & barely experiential learning, mostly sensation fixation.

Females “evolved,” to have personality disorders. The most commonly obvious ones are narcissistic personality disorder, histrionic personality disorder, & delusion is also a major one, among others. Why is it that when society regards evolution, they always make the assumption that both sexes shared evolution? They didn’t. Men evolved. Women barely did.
Just my personal observation, I have noticed that, for analytical reasons of mine, whenever I witness BDSM sites, there is much more emphasis by women. I’ve seen a lot more lesbian, or lesbian experimenters, managing & interested. The men involved have a lot less energy with it than they do. Men might have the organizational skills to front such communities, but women are much more insistent with it.
This calls for an extremely ethical mass reporting & testing by males to select traits males want.
Bluntly & simplistically because I don’t have time for semantics: women selectively breed & encourage males to have personality disorders like women do, keeping men in the past, or maybe a better way of putting it is no real personality, you’re just simply a “propulsion” grunting retardation to the whore, which is why no men should even take women’s tests seriously. (Which reminds me that being intellectual with women can work because, even though some males don’t like that method because they don’t want to have her as a combative peer, a lot of times they actually just parrot you like a little kid if it’s done a certain way.)
You don’t actually need to stabilize her if she is already committed, i.e., is prone to truly love you, which is why BDSM is really kind of a joke. Whenever I interact with whores, as they try to see if they can switch to me to get more accommodations for their privileges, without telling me they already have another initially, they have a tendency afterwards of saying “my boyfriend doesn’t let me hang out with other guys.” They say this of a way that discloses no real integrity – no real personal, serious consciousness.

The culture threatened by REAL male-centrism casts male exploration & experimentation as “peter-pan syndrome,” yet suffering & struggling is worshiped by gynocentrism. Masculinity is celebrated as almost mindless toil because females have the exclusive ownership of creation. Men are actually the ones who have assisted birth with female literal self destruction.

In a gynocentric culture, the masculine birthright of peace, for a lack of a better word is ruined: The boy lives in a world where struggling of the collective unconscious of the past is encouraged by gynocentrism. The child then bonds to struggling. This bonding then becomes an addiction to struggling. The male then creates situations of struggling to stir the main feelings of satisfaction.

Besides defending destructive trendy culture, which inculcates that individuated/mental males are “embarrassing,” females will even defend convicted criminals – as long as they’re exciting/”non-awkward.” The “assault” on mentally self-controlled males – calling them all these irrelevant” things as “awkward” – is the basis for every impulsive agenda of the whore. It bestows them leeway to indulge with thugs/immature, lame men & murderers.
While women strive for various styles, they actively appose real variation.

Erin Pizzey, writer on issues of domestic violence, which was even suppressed in England, addressed groups of workers described as having staff burnout. It occured when all provisions were made, yet women would still return to violent situations.
Just take the violent situations out of the equation. What do you get? Other types of burnout due to women.
Also, consider that emotional violence, which is more feminine, can be extremely cruel.
Anyway, all forms of violence occurs with both sexes, the most common for of female physical violence is proxy. So much for the theory that only men are aggressors.
Some claim that women who are attracted to violent/unhealthy relationships have daddy-issues, but there is not enough evidence for me to believe that’s mostly true, & there are mass demographics of females, of many consumers, to have amoral, bad tendencies. Knowing the “bipolar” nature of female men’s rights activists, I question Erin Pizzey’s potential level of cognitive dissonance.
The communities who have failed to build a structure necessary to provide an anti-naive way are the ones who are habituated to feel the ebb & flow of excitement & uncaring attitudes.

Warped masculinity is by the fact that women like men for a period, then deject/forget – literal anti-masculinity. It requires an excess for female inconsistency to be lessened.

In a foul, ineffectual nation, masculinity copes too well to not even realize it: the adjustment results with an addiction to instincts & struggle.

Erin Pizzey makes no serious mention that males who have degrees of immoral behavior have had major influence from the maternal. E.P. only makes the isolated argument that women who are attracted to the drama & excitement of a violent/immoral man just have daddy-issues.
Family counselor, Jesse Lee Peterson, with other studies, has stated that most violent male offenders come from single female-headed household.
It’s true: both from experiential learning of female collectivism, as well as empirical data, most males I’ve known who were raised by single mothers, or had too much influence from the maternal, had some serious personality disorders, or were impolite.
By first impression, you can’t discern the exact influence that would make mothers poor candidates, but drama tends to be more intimate/inclusive.
There’s an aspect about female nature that’s very destructive, as they feed on negative energy.
Stating “correlation does not imply causation” is a very fashionable thing. The relationship between women & immoral behavior is very real ( you can investigate the citations on end), as women have a tendency to, not only set conditions by their abuse, most often hypocritical, immature, emotionally-charged, also have limitation of understanding, & fueling more of it, on some kind of force, tainting decision making on the age-range when consciousness hasn’t even seriously developed.
Suicide rate of youth from fatherless homes is much more frequent, behavioral disorders are more frequent, high-school quitting, etc.. Without the male having proper diagnostics & help, the mother assigns emotionally damaging pills.
Women need to be noticed by mass culture to not be allowed to have any control of what is critical.
When Ann Coulter, which I don’t promote extremely – she’s not that impressive, explained some of these points on the Father Albert show, most of the women in the audience just proved her points by exhibiting primal responses.
Sure, not all males who have a major maternal schooling will become criminals, but the point is is that it can happen, & they usually adopt some level of immorality.

When pain & pleasure become mixed of early childhood, the result is further abuse.
Erin Pizzey records a case of, & it is an integral one, When 5 years of age, a girl named Olga was smacked by hand. As she felt a sense of fear & anxiety, she suddenly got a warm, tingling pleasure within her whole body.
She began to seek more.
Sexual intercourse was meaningless years later. It was extreme beatings she wanted.

What Paul Julius Moebius concluded – that the woman is an imbecile due to her physiology – has given me two conclusions:
According to researchers at Rutgers University, pain tolerance, which I’m not arguing for, happens during female orgasm, which is noticeable of how different it is than that of males, as well as that brain regions became more engaging during stimulation & orgasm.
Because of that, it gives masculinity, 1, more reason to have women sexually androcentric for the most part, to give females analgesics & stress relief, &, 2, to keep them with something busy, not tainting masculine studies.

I don’t think Erin Pizzey is intellectually honest (or gets it): Even though she makes a distinction of violence prone women, who will cling to such situations, & the other type, who can get with a violent relationship, will love the man but hate his violence, there is an unwillingness to address female amorality, which has it’s very basis of females being sensation creatures of various flexibility. They’re not intellectual creatures.
Women use words, & I define use as exploit, to further their drives of sensations.

Professionals are inhibited by policies. Policies are due to survival mechanisms. Survival mechanisms are due to female collectivism: “I can’t say that to my peers because I could lose my job, etc.. If I lose that, I could lose chance with a whore.”

It is further axioms that women are delusional on many levels: The adrenaline rush women want of some ways are burdening society with, which gives them more false beliefs, suddenly they feel like they are super-human, or something.
It’s partly why whores have the delusional fetish of an “invincible” masculinity, or something like that, that they think they’re going to get, & then when women interpret that he’s not, she then ruins him. It’s no wonder that women just run out of men, as they sift them out periodically before & after being with them for an indefinite amount of time. It’s almost as if they run out of them to keep themselves from ever realizing how delusional they are & that what they fantasize about doesn’t really exist (other than some sloppier versions).

People who are aggressive have inferiority complexes anyway, or are not intelligent. The wrinkles on ones skin are earned by age. A more reserved personality is earned by having more intelligence.

I’ve typed about what a spectrum is, but consider this: the color red can have other associations: The hybrid color: metallic pink-orange is not red, but it is associated with red.
Daddy-issues or not, there is a wealth of information – anecdotal, i.e., alert to female collectivism, as well as empirical – of how immature the spectrum, without using the word immature, of female sexuality actually is.
I think Erin Pizzey has a sort of “Tom Boy” condition of accumulating some information because she didn’t make it as really attractive, & I don’t mean that from a subjective way: Most men would not have the strong urge to have sex with her, so, because of her practical approach, she likely doesn’t even realize aspects about her own collective (or she denies it).
Yeah, beauty can be subjective on occasion, but you don’t need citations to make the general axiom that most men have a universal preference of a body figure.
There is a general trend of female psychology that “to punish is to improve,” or “the different is creepy,” etc.. They love facades of alternative lifestyles, but they hate alternative strategies.

There is a compulsory aspect about males who are burdened with female collectivism.

So I saw this group of teenage kids, wasting time, smoking, drinking at a park. There was one girl. I approached to school them. Talked to them a little, then ended it with: “you guys are wasting your time with her: when she finds another guy with better cigarettes, she’s going to “stab you in the back.”” Then I mocked them: “Yo, yo, dog, smoke weed.” I fled because they were preparing 4 vs. 1. Both sexes of that instance devalued me – “pussy” – because I didn’t give them entertainment. Get some potential brain damage, etc. – what kind of logic is that?

Bad guys are first for whores. They’ll introduce you to drugs, clumsy, feminine sex, & rock-n-roll. Good guys are for paying the bills.

Let me deconstruct a quote by Erin Pizzey:

“If society follows this pattern of moral decline, the future for children in this country looks even bleaker than the present.
………… a deep greedy need of self-service. They got where they are by a ruthless driving ambition. ( E.P. also makes distinctions of different types of violence. She notes of “intellectual” violence of middle-class, of which some ‘go mad’) ….contended human beings seldom seek high office.”

That’s the essential samples of a couple of her paragraphs.
My question is: What are the events & actions that serves as a stimulus & initiate or precipitates those series of reactions? The appetition of women does. Because female collectivism is the opposite of “spiritual” nature, it produces more primal instincts of man, unnoticed by mechanization.

When I was reading some of Erin Pizzey’s work, even though she associates with men’s rights activists, she seems more like a feminist.
She even gives her feminine tendecies of stating: “I have never met a monster, only vulnerable, confused, grief-stricken people expressing their pain in rage and despair.” – female lame morality. She probably masturbated to violent beastiality porn afterwards.
The “monstars”, implied by women, are harmless males. You get the point. I’m being provocative It’s not an issue of semantics.

Your decisions are much better by your information, & the really extraordinary information is, whether intentionally or not, stopped by female nature.
If all you’ve known your entire life is a poor way of living, then you think it’s “great.”
America is a culture of the archetype of “Thanatose” – death. The entertainment is a large portion of the information that we get.
This is not “social constructs” or “social engineering” of its core. It’s that women have men operating as “compulsory”, for a lack of a better word. Women also like their surroundings to be familiar: they want you, like them, to have have various forms of histrionic personality disorders: they weed out the masculine men from the effeminate men.
I hate anything that involves violence. It’s not even necessarily a “sensitive” thing. It’s just: How can I even take that seriously?
Why would you want to make obscurantist what shouldn’t be. Women are the ones who are obsessed with making it that way.
As female’s less evolved selection is contaminating the social pool, Female romance/sexuality is infested with fickleness, immaturity, additionally to women being clumsy & not even knowing how affection of quality works, drama & horror/suspense themes.
The reason this is is the same phenomenal parallel of the majority of artists who don’t actually have real talent. Most people don’t have real creativity. When you go to even the most extreme concerts, you see people doing the same thing, & there is trends of making their presentations dramatic because they don’t actually have any real creativity. There’s no need for the artificial like that.
This is the way that female sexuality is as well: Female sexuality is a soap-opera because they feel the need to over-hype & dramatize to maintain the female ego.

The only point that Erin Pizzey makes that I fundamentally agree with is that she states that experiences can cause addictions.
There are many men now who are defeatist, which is understandable, because they learned from experience, while naive little-boys keep persuading to apply male versions of cosmetics for women.



Nichiren’s View of Women by Mori Ichiu – Japanese Journal of Religious Studies, Vol. 30, No. 3/4, Feminism & religion in Contemporary Japan (Fall, 2003), pg. 279

fMRI scans reveal why pain tolerance goes up during female orgasm and shows brain does not turn off by Bob Yirka – medicalxpress-dot-com

Getting Men Involved: The Newsletter of the Bay Area Male Involvement Network (author(s) not specified.) – fathermag-dot-com

Single Moms Raising More Violent Men by Jesse Lee Peterson – wnd-dot-com

The Emotional Terrorist & The Violence-Prone by Erin Pizzey, pg. 15, 38, 53, 59, 60, 105, 135

How I Learnt Not To Be Afraid And Love Bukkake by Max Hydrogen – Sheddingoftheego-dot-com

Study finds marijuana use is associated with dating violence by Roberta Jenkins, August 13, 2017 – psypost-dot-org

Consumption of alcohol and marijuana associated with lower GPA in college – PLOS, March 8, 2017

BrainWashed by Ben Shapiro pg.: XV, 1

Chain Reaction: Einstein to The Atomic Bomb by Walter Isaacson, March 2008 issue – Discover Magazine

Men and women have different views on the most effective way to flirt by Eric W. Dolan, October 24, 2017 – psypost-dot-org

How young women convince men who want to use a condom to have unproted sex instead by Eric W. Dolan, October 29, 2017 – psypost-dot-org

Millennial Women Are Starting To Hit THe Wall by Vincent Law, July 27, 2017