Distinguishing Different Types Of Fear | Jessie Nagy

hate speech

What research have you done? Answer the question. I’ve done research for YEARS not minutes of a short video.

If you’re a journalist (which I’m not. Journalists mainly report current events. I’m a philosopher belonging to a school I enhanced called counter-intuitive philosophy. I also report neuroscienec, general psychology, sexology, & more.), do you have to directly experience everything you report about? No. You talk to people, You look at data. You look at how they’re saying similar things, & then you put the suggestions before people & state: make of it what you will.

Ego is an expression of fear. It’s a natural motivator of life. We all (most) have it. I will bring sanity regarding this extremely confused topic touted about & make distinctions of healthy, rational fears & others. Ego & fear are so dominant in this culture, often not realized they are the same with various derivatives.

Freud was an experimentalist, not a theorist. He studied many, many people & realized they all had ego, & because they all seemed to be normal, like most everyone else, typical, average, then Freud made the conclusion that ego was generally a good thing. It depends. When most of the population has ego, they can’t make the distinction & realize they have their own version of fear.

Fear also has many disguises. One of which is loudness, convincing that it is not fear.

Defense mechanisms are used not by scientific, philosophical axioms, but by lazy assumptions & opinions shared – another manifestation of fear.

Fear can be disguised as courage. Fear can be the contrarian comparison to others for resentment that others don’t notice their lives/making them realize they’re not really important. Acting brave due to fear of seeming afraid is more commanding than fear of injury. He does not dare to suggest caution due to fear of being interpreted as a coward.

Fear can be snobbishness – snubbing others they’re not sure about. (Mine is the parallel of that, but how it differs is by knowing them: I’ve accumulated data to confirm experiences. There’s a difference.) Then there’s the derivative of that: not censuring others for fear of ruining a party or the feared label as being withdrawn. Fear can be impulsive hostility.

There’s many different types of fear. It can be good. It can be bad. Admitting fear as manifested differently is what separates me with the delusional.

Fear is disguised as ambition[1], dominance: “I can’t be a man with self preservation because that will make look “uncool,” so I have to dominate external things.”

Fear can be disguised as bohemianism, an urge to be animated at the party. Sometimes it hides with indulgence.

There’s fear manifested by school, church, legislature, etc.,

But having fear is sometimes fine, & admitting it is a part of being mature & realistic. Women ruin this type of realism & maturity by their craving. Acceptance is initial for transitioning. The system evolves by creating axioms, admitting to truth/honesty, by organizing real meaning. What is the meaning of human conditions? The significant purpose is to decrease entropy. If that doesn’t happen – by female invalidating of realistic information by ownership of filtering, it just becomes randomness, basically nothing – lack of created structures. By taking female filtering out of the equation, it optimizes itself with building systems. The female ego is not self awareness. It is self instincts – not awareness – of the service of fear & a bad ability to accept realism.

She wants you to present yourself a certain way to impress her friends.

Fear – We most have it (Maybe if you’re some kind of a mutant, you don’t). For women to validate the notion of dominance as “not” fear, society has failed to admit fear as a manifestation of life, therefore, has ruined distinctions of rational fear & other types.

How can you not derive a sane, healthy, logical type of fear due to this:

Murderers, including cop-killers, were reported to have received sex by female prison guard in the NSW prisons[2].

Fear can also be disguised as pride/possessiveness – territorial jealousy because another male comes near her, yet not being able to judge her for fear of losing it & realizing his relationship is based by lies.

Fear is so widespread with various manifestations that there is an overproduction of hiders/pretenders & a shortage of those willing to bravely admit RATIONAL fear – a healthy sign of being mature & realistic. By denial of allowing men to admit & acknowledge that the male experience IS fragile, it is allowing women to rate, with their selfishness, their crude taste, their shoddy standards, their materialism, the displays of the pretense of not having fear – making males commit rational “suicide.” As a result, males internalize their frustration, their confusion, so they attack other males both by the direct & indirect meaning. Don’t pretend to make a performance for whores. Just admit that you are human & not some fucking fantasy that the woman believes she’s entitled to. There’s nothing wrong withe male admitting their REALISTIC experience, & there’s no such thing as the reality of what a woman ultimately wants, so give her the middle-finger & bravely admit that your not really, completely brave, say: “Yeah, I am vulnerable.”

Some desire is beneficial – the kind that brings contentment. Women are generally not content though. It is an unhealthy type of desire[3]. All the qualities women want men to be generally do not come together. This is why women burden society with their inability to be content, & make males “implode.” Buddha understood this, & he didn’t need to “cut up” facts to elaborate formulas: He called-a-spade-a-spade – that’s a masculine form of linguistics. Women have the detrimental desires that lead to perennial nonsense. It also causes the cultural idea that if something is not physical, it is likely to “not” be real. Women eventually don’t like or think lesser of husbands who can’t give them their desires, but you can’t really make a woman’s desires complete. Women are not truly grateful. They are unethical.

Buddha understood that making women happy is usually a trap. Instead, control desires, rather than having it control you.

Factually,[4] the more women are satisfied, the more they will commit unethical actions: A study published by Journal of Sexuality & Culture noted the more satisfied she is with primary relationship, the more satisfied she is with affairs. “Everything’s going great.” This is what charged female optimism is – destructive for masculinity.

Women try to get more because of their defect to not be satisfied. They will flirt with demons to get it:

A husband’s wife was cheating during marriage with a prisoner. This was from a source that actually sensationalizes things like this rather than criticizing it, so I will not actually provide a the source to it because I care more about ethics than some whore who can only understand the physical: according to them, it’s not real if it doesn’t involve physical experience.

Women need to be “called out,” as they’d say, before men start stopping the cycle by giving.

Factually, Australian prison guards keep – CONTINUOUSLY – getting caught having sex with inmates.

One female officer even smuggled steroids to an inmate[5].

Why isn’t the Me-too trend talking about this?

We/most have fear, but I have rational fear. There’s a difference. It’s not “fear of women.” I’s fear of results because of their fake, dumb ethics that could have a person like me, who actually has serious ethics, made a martyr  by their social retardation.

& why isn’t the Me-too trend talking about this:

It’s estimated that there are more women with debt counseling, but when men have debt, they have more trouble paying for it. Still, women have more debt than men.[6]

Women have more of a challenge with resisting sales. Women spend more recklessly.

Women like to shop a lot. That is a problem. Keep her badly planned desire at the mall restricted. Don’t encourage the addiction.

The fact that women manage money differently, males need to understand what kind of problems she can create before giving to her. I’d say don’t even give.

Some solutions (of Many) for males:

Let’s establish that you are one with a lot of stress – a typical male experience, the stress of that can reduce serotonin. Serotonin is a chemical that basically creates or serves as neurotransmitters. It helps your brain & central nervous system function. Without enough serotonin you feel depressed, so you can, with all that stress & negativity, get moods that reduce your serotonin. When that happens you get more bogged. That’s the mind starting something that the body will be effected by. Chronic negativity will have the body getting used to producing less serotonin – modifying the physical by the mental & emotional. Males need to be more engaging with their emotions regardless of what women want. The doctor then might prescribe you one of the ~10 or ~20 drugs that are of that same family of serotonin modifiers. Thanks to one of the factors being whores telling masculinity that it’s “wrong” to be “too nice,” or whatever dumb whores are calling it these days. The doctor tells you it’s a physical problem. The physical & mental though are connected, & the mental causes physical changes often.

Simply: find a constructive hobby that doesn’t really include her desires & impressing her, & be proud of it. Enjoy it. Continue it, but, of course, always have good information to know what you’re doing.

Turning to drugs, alcohol, etc., is the last thing you want to do.

Serotonin factually reduces appetite as you eat.[7]

A counter argument could be by pick-up-artists that impressing whores is a source of serotonin stimulation. Well, it’s possible that retards can do it that way. However (not that I buy it), this isn’t advice for them. This is advice for smarter males who gain satisfaction by holier-than-thou means.

Could it be that their whores are really just dragging them down? Factually, females have an incremental amount of negativity compared to males[8], especially when younger, so I just don’t buy that these pick-up-artists are “liberated.” I believe they’re just infected with female delusion.

Interestingly, women have more “internal” related depression due to things like interpersonal relationships + the usual biological processes. You know the drill. They don’t know how to have affection. Compared to that, males have depression displayed more sensitively to career, etc.. Hmm, I wonder what the obvious source of that is – not. Both factors though have one thing missing – proper established androcentric sexuality. I just don’t buy that these men wasting $30.00(+) dollars on bottles & flashy clothes of some sort are really “enjoying” themselves. Why do you see so much scape goats by them?

Reduced levels of serotonin increases aggressive behaviours.[9] Reduced serotonin creates instinct-hierarchies. Increased serotonin enhances pro-social actions.

Pick-up-artists & people who believe the alpha-male myth are actually unconsciously sanctioning a type of masculinity with defective brain function with damaged chemical processes. Her source of satisfaction is your desensitizing, & so many males are so desensitized they actually call it “winning” & “dominance.” Men & women are not each other’s helpers. We are engaged with a tug-of-war whether we know it or not. Better to take from her than for her to take from the male. But my strategy is not to “act kind of like a dick,” or whatever, because that’s her benefit. My strategy is to agreeableness with “Peter-Pan syndrome.” Increasing serotonin also helps males to achieve real power. Feeling good is generally associated with longevity[10], so go do your own thing. No. the real own thing, & do it with being smart about it. Pick-up-artists are not really living for themselves. They’re living for whores by whore terms.

Lambert argued that decline of vigorous physical exercise may contribute to incremental depression of modernity[11]

You are likely one of the feminized men today controlled by women & sex with the pretense of “dominance.” You’re not dominating anything but a game of cultivating delusions.  The fact is is that women are not men’s equals, & the pretense of “dominance” that most men have gives women dominance over men. Like the fucking cunt that she is, she claims “wimps.” This is absolutely not true. Respected men of many fields – not “wimps” – will state the same experience.

This is why we call women bitches. They have an animal-pack mentality.




1: Understanding Fear, pg. 12, Bonaro W. Overstreet

2: Calls for crackdown on guards having sex with prisoners | 7-News – yahoo-dot-com

3: Why Women cannot be Happy in Marriage by Blue Lotus – buddhazero-dot-com

4: Women Are Happier Cheating Than Men, Study Finds – realclearlife-dot-com

5: Prison love: Jails a ‘hotbed’ of sex for female guards & killers by Candace Sutton – news-dot-com-dot-au

6: Do Women Have More Debt Than Men? by Kristy Welsh by Kristy Welsh – creditinfocenter-dot-com

7: How Serotonin Regulates Different Body Functions by Kristalyn Salters-Pedneault, P – verywellmind-dot-com

8: PDF: Why is depression more prevalent in women? by Paul R. Albert, PhD – jpn-dot-ca

9: The neurobiology of human social behaviour: an important but neglected topic – ncbi-dot-nlm-dot-nih-dot-gov

10: How to increase Serotonin in the human brain without drugs by Simon N. Young – ncbi-dot-nlm-dot-nih-dot-gov

11: Ibid


Hey, Bohemians & Normal People, Stop Quelling Bookstores, Especially Independent Ones | Jessie Nagy, AKA: Pen-etrator

what I do


There was book burning & programs of censorship in several Western localities during the Eisenhower president era.[1] Modern book “burning” could be likened to reported stagnation of civilization:

Only a moment is needed for a casual person, arrogating the resonance of authority, to stigmatize a book – to label it implausible, etc.. It takes rather longer to refute such work. One must be engaged with intricacy & fact-checking quibbles that scarcely conduce to  the television. Good television revels more with dramatic bloodbath, etc., than “robotic” info..

I was speaking to a lady at one of my local bookstores. She told me that there used to be more than 50 independent bookstores. Now it is reduced to 16. She told me it was because of things like digital books, etc..

I decided, after being angry by what she told me, with a courtesy amount, to spend $100.00 for my favorite category: neuroscience. It’s the most relevant. I don’t like things because it’s fun. I like things for being relevant. I like things for it being worthy obligations. I’m usually not that nice to females, but this situation had me obligated to certain ethics. I later donated an entire, huge box of valuable books to help their business, & she was only the co-owner anyway. The main owner is a man.

To be vulgar, stupid, or only mildly educated is fashionable.

The new technology is bringing illiteracy not literacy. Some of the articles are so bad it actually states it all with the title. There’s much less serious understanding of much meaning – much more intent to things you can do very quickly. There’s even some studies of neuroscience which suggests that cognitive changes as an effect of the reduction due to the rapid stimulation of kind of stimulus hunger that results & the restrictions of attention by the new technology[2]. The new technology does offer more understanding, but it can also often reduce it.

(Do not mistake technetronic markets with technocratic.)

With the increase of catharsis-culture: People are thinking more about their smart-phones, etc., then serious things.

Internet selling also raped the communities of bookstores. There’s an incentive for people to sell because they’ve all been conditioned by slave-wage schedules to sell by auction prices: A book that would otherwise be $15.00-$25.00 dollars is soled for $80.00-$150.00. You’re really just doing a disservice. STOP SELLING LIKE THAT. Give back to your community, & encourage more local INDEPENDENT bookstores to thrive. Why would you want to live in a culture that doesn’t offer enough of that? It also makes worse jobs. How stupid can you be? STOP SELLING BY EGREGIOUS AUCTION PRICES WITH E-SELLING, YOU FUCKING CUNTS. Those books need to be set to accessible prices.

Because of the idiots of the Albert Camus persuasion, they’ve ruined book culture by molesting book-culture, with their stupid vape-consuming, ETC. They say that I’m sad because I actually have standards. They think that I “need to get a life.” I’m actually doing something with my life. They need to get a life.

Addictions are not limited to substances. They are addicted to delusions of grandeur & casual lifestyles. When the reward circuits are stimulated, an addiction forms, whether it’s someone taking heroin to ease suffering or the compulsive irritation a whore has when a new person asks questions about options to a particular task. Unlike illicit drug use which is stigmatized, obsessive casual life-styles does not share the same social disapproval. A conformity bias tends to produce the belief that there is nothing bad about this behavior. Normality should not be confused with mental health.

It’s all because of them, the hoards have many names: Beatniks, normies – all basically worthless.

Social networks (superficial) help the social choose better answers yet they don’t prime them to answer more logically themselves. Social “learning” does not help individuals control their intuition. It helps society thrive with castigating critical thought, which is a form of being anti-social. Most aspects of “social networks” is just isolating units anyway, even when they meet, there will be no real ability to learn new customs, etc., because they’re habituated to be instant gratification addicts.

There’s an ideology that markets provide “freedom of choice.” That’s not true. Freedom of choice starts with the will to think more seriously. Is that what you want in life – just more & more habituating gadgets? There are lots of other things in life that the market doesn’t even offer.

If males dedicated more time to discipline, they wouldn’t have to do all these other stupid things to get attention of whores, rather, they could assemble females directly instead.

I did classes for my food-handler’s card, yet no one checked. The managers would have unsanitary methods. This lack of serious ethics to subscribe to rules, what they would call “doing things by the book” is due to their life of appetites.

Serious ethics are not rewarded by socializing of which the female is primary. Factually, it’s even punished.

Idiots addicted to dopamine processes, this is what you don’t get: DISCIPLINE IS SUPPOSED TO BE BORING. BORING/TRANQUILITY IS A GOOD THING. It’s an indication of self control.

Can we clean the fucking streets of all these disgusting vape-shops, liquor stores, alcohol lounges, smoke shops, tattoo parlors, fast-food places, etc., & replace them with bookstores, especially used, learning work-shops, & independent health-grocery stores?

If you participate with anti-systems culture, you are effeminate, & I don’t mean that as a pejorative. You act feminine with feminine activities – self-worship, covetousness, fame – to be with them.

People have barely any respect for mutualism. If you think it’s so pathetic, then you should fend for yourself without the help of the police department, street cleaning, parks, the fire department, trash pick-up, snow plows, public schools, LIBRARIES, etc..

The real parasitic hippies are the predatory profit seekers of excess.

Capitalism is seen by a lot of people, particularly as those who value American drives, as a “freedom.” Modern capitalism is not freedom. It’s the antithesis. Then there’s the left-right divide/democratic vs. republican. “If you don’t like capitalism, then you must be a Socialist or the other c. word.”

Actually, the money-power people have much more shared commonality with the Marxists because Marxism, Communism are materialist oriented. (The different materialism I condone – books – is oriented for the mind.) Capitalism & Communism are two “sides of the same coin.”

The producers are being over-regulated by these parasitic forces. The producers are the farmers, the carpenters, the builders, etc.. Are they the ones controlling. No. the usurers are. The ultimate parasites are the bankers, etc..

This is permitting moral degeneracy: to condone someone like Rand. This is linked to other moral failings.  The worship of money is also the worship of women.

They say: “That’s just business.” They tolerate unethical practices with commerce.

Consider this: The market offers a choice – this brand of automobile or that brand. It’s like being offered the same cola packed by different design. It doesn’t offer the choice of a sub-way – what’s good for me, what’s good for the environment, good for future generations. Markets offer individual consumption, & the concern for markets is to get buyers to think of terms of selfishness, amassing more stuff, “forget other considerations.” Most adds are designed to make the buyer make an irrational choice. They won’t necessarily state it by economic courses in college.

When these companies make addictive products & sell toxins, products we don’t really need, etc., they defeat the competition, but society participates with it because they are kept ignorant. This type of predatory capitalism is something that Ayn Rand encouraged. This isn’t even objectivism. It’s subjective because it redistributes immediate gratification. It inhibits shared respect & disciplined development.

Truth becomes “spam” because of those idiots.

The economic system is destroying the environment.

Books Are Weapons, so please fund local book-stores, even thrift stores, so that we can have more of that on almost every street corner & more understanding people instead of “Golden Arches” of soiled/fake/modified food, etc., on every street corner. Spend that $20.00 on some books instead of a “dub sack,” poppers, or whatever. You can easily buy 3-4(+ sometimes) in a used/independent store. I just recently bought 5 books – molecular biology, 2 books on economics, linguistics/psychology of symbolism, & ancient central/south American mysteries – for $3.00 at my local thrift store. They have a deal of $1.00 per book or 5 for $3.00. When you sift through these books & it makes you look like an “old lady,” it’s supposed to be “dorky.” That’s a GOOD thing.

Get this: people don’t have serious ethics. The reason they don’t have serious ethics is because they’d rather spend their money on lucrative things as bong-shops, etc., & the reason they don’t have ethics is because they don’t read books – a vicious cycle.

Those stupid body body modifications that people waste their money for, that originates by rituals of impressing to have sex appeal. Don’t believe this nonsense that they have some kind of “unique identity. They are just desperate to impress.

I saw the other day what appeared to be a “dust-devil.” (I live in a desert.) when I got closer, I realized the yellow smoke was actually from a fast-food place – disgusting. This what money is going to.

Those who make their living by lending money are parasitical for the real economic activities of agriculture & manufacturing .

This mentality seeps into other aspects of living: There was a short article on even dictionary-dot-com: ‘What’s So Wrong With “Nice”?’ The article states an etymology of nice as nescius – “ignorant” [14th century] By 100 years later, it was referred to someone who dressed well & was precise, reserved. Who the fuck are the ignorant to judge others as “ignorant”? This idea wasn’t even by a scientific analysis. This was a cultural/artistic one by something like folklore.  This archaic mentality is still apart of our culture[3]. Excuse me, YOU’RE culture, you filthy animal, not my culture. YOU’RE the one that’s ignorant. These fucking people are inhibiting better people by what was during the medieval. Sarcasm: Gee, what a great argument – to live by a code from 100s of years ago when people couldn’t even wipe themselves properly. Look: women have an in-group bias: They’re attracted to effeminate men: They’re attracted to other men who act like them – not nice.

An article published[4] with a psychological journal, entitled ‘Emotion’ featured data that happy expressions exhibited by males were seen as less attractive to females. Although female happiness was liked by males more than females, female happiness is insignificant & inconsistent by varying moods, so this aspect of women not liking happy male expressions is an aspect of their in-group bias. You experience it when women get frustrated in the work-force. Showing happiness is contrarian to the  ripe conditions of over-work to impress women – this broken, rugged masculinity with hard hands. The ethos of: “better to give than to receive” is hated by women. This “uncool” warmth & friendliness, giving instead of getting is hated by the Ayn Rand philosophy of being selfish.

Ayn Rand is such a shill, with her subversion of the meaning of objetive. Giving back to the communities is objectivism because it’s functional for transitions.

The article also stated that pride was seen as attractive to females. That depends on what distinct type of pride is understood.  When a male has pride, talking about the fallacies of male genital mutilation (MGM), it’s “overbearing,” “embarrassing,” etc.. Pride is only allowed by whores if you’re proud of “playing in your own dung” – wasting money on a drink at a club.

Yes, I have a very serious conservative moral code. REAL pride/self control.



1: Books That Changed The World by Robert B. Downs, pg.: 7

2: Are Smartphones Making Us Stupid | Christopher Bergland – psychologytoday-dot-com

3: What’s So Wrong With “Nice”? – dictionary-dot-com

4: Happy guys finish last: The Impact of emotion expression on sexual attraction by Tracy, Jessica L., Beall, Alec T.  – apa-dot-org

Religious Nonsense | Jessie Nagy





Ancient exploring people from the north left a religious legacy.

If you go to Nepal, you will find a Matriarchal religion – the Kumari.

The original comes from the North.

She was the one who allowed the king to rule. She had to renew his power.

The North exported this religion to the Indus-valley. The same religion was shared.

The king was selected by a process of trials. He could have leadership present with this matriarchal society. He could be the ruler with the woman giving him power.

The mentality of the May Queen was the best woman choosing the best man based on his Olympian acts. The man was not the one who chose the woman. He had to become attractive to the woman.

The Northern May Queen kept the religious procesessions. It even survived to Christianity, often disguised as “Maria.”

The cycles of time, as it generally does, edits the original contexts, so just any search on Google isn’t going to necessarily be precise.

With the absence of sexual “Mormonism,” you have your own anthropology partly to blame for the decline of civilization.

While I have heard that women of Northern traditions have a history of being more passive & receptive, liking smarter males, supposedly letting decent guys control, it’s also a lot easier for the North to not even have the least bit understanding about the situation men have in America. These fucking whores will “just drop you at the drop of a hat,” regardless of how much of an “alpha” male you are.

Now that that is typed, regarding something else:

The early Christian Church, with the guidance of St. Paul, condemned circumcision.

It began with Abraham, discontinued by Jesus.

Mormons also condemn it.

Traditional Christianity takes it as an insult.

There’s a variety of answers regarding J***** (taboo word) traditions of cutting. Some claim it’s unnecessary.

Biblical scholars claim that a passage persuading to circumcise was added ~500 B.C. – more than 1,000 years after the time of Abraham.

By the fifth century B.C. , during the time of the return of the J*** from Babylonian captivity, the priesthood tried to dominate politics. They did this by instituting a temple-centered sacrificial cult, & this is by a source by an M.D. (Paul M. Fleiss) – I scam you not, which newborn males were initiated by male genital mutilation. Thus the creation of the Abrahamic cutting myth was added to ‘Genesis,’ pretending it was already there. The priesthood’s power was diminished by ~ A.D. 71. The practice of cutting was still a part of the He*****.

Rules of cutting are maintained by the Talmud & Mishnah, the former being a commentary of the latter.

By the Mishnah, ritual cutting has 3 applications: milah (slicing), periah (tearing), & metzitzah (sucking).

The second instruction is done by the cutter inserting a specially sharpened fingernail into the wound & tears & scrapes the inner fold.

The third instruction: The cutter sucks the blood of penis.

Don’t believe it? Believe it. There’s plenty of video recordings of it on the internet. The reason there is lots of entertainment distracting people is so that they won’t be watching the rituals anyway. If they do, they’ll just try to make more entertainment. Entertainment is a fucking disease.

While many sects of the J*** have modified this practice, they still need to be disclosed.

Sigismund Schlomo Freud defended his sons to not experience cutting. Would he protect others? Theodore Herzl did the same for his son. Would he do the same for others?

Many infants stop crying because they have a state of shock.

Even though Muslims are largest cutting group, their holy book does not condone it.

The Koran is anticircumcision.

It even blames the archetypal Satan for tricking man:

(Satan said:) “I will mislead them, I will entice them, I will command them to mark the ears of livestock…….” [4:119]

The Sunnah, written hundreds of years after Muhammad’s death, feature recommendation for cutting both male & female.

This similar thing has happened as many poseurs have joined the more worthy extremist pro-male spaces, with acolytes of Gavin Mcinnes.

Classical Greek historians claim that some Arab tribes dwelling in the Red Sea did penile mutilations before the birth of Muhammad. Migrations, slave trading, competition allowed cutting to go to Africa & parts of Asia. They are done as tests of pain endurance.

Get these fucking posers with their pop. culture ideas out.

Many Muslim cutters are barbers, often used with razors or kitchen knives.

It was reported that during nineteenth century North Africa, the barber dipped the cut penis in a basin of egg white, then dusted it with rabbit waste matter & powdered henna. If the boy displayed pain. the consequences for his family could be worse. Muslim fathers have actually killed their boys after displaying discomfort.

With dominance hierarchies, all that is required is for one to have others subscribe to it. This is why I type that abandoning “alpha” male competition is needed. They’re subscribing to trends. It only gives credit to a fringe. Masculinity can better society by adhering to the various nature of masculinity, so get these fucking posers out who try preach that you should be adhering to a prescribed dominant archetype. It’s a religion – a cult, not realism. Politics infiltrate agendas.

In some parts of the Muslim world, there is entire removal of all the pubic skin – cutting from naval to anus to remove surface skin, then hot oil is applied. I scam you not. There’s a whole other world besides internet “funnies,” etc..

Again, there’s quarrels of Moslems with unauthentic & unreliable Sunnah & Hadith.

Political laws are conjured by a few males to dominate others, & then these idiots ruin it for other males.

Circumcision is a blood ritual disguised as science.

What – you think that religious sects have no persuasion over politics? Why is it do you see religious figures exchanging with world leaders? What kind of bubble are you living in? Get a life.

Anthropologists have suggested that genital mutilation began ~10,000 years ago by Arab & African Tribes who lived near what is now known as the Saharah desert. They became increasingly violent because of the ruined food supply due to climate changes. Yes, catastrophic environmental changes happened. Rape, slavery, & war ensued. They began to worship a bloodthirsty deity, starting child sacrifice.

Freud believed that they altered killing their boys to killing parts: cutting off penises & testicles, then cutting off just parts of skin.

Thousands of years later, Egypt was doing circumcision.

Don’t think that these are THE only defective. Anyone who has a penchant for violence has something wrong with them. I might use it to teach someone a lesson, but I don’t waste money on degenerate, garbage “snuff” films. Women liking “snuff” themes is something that society doesn’t care to acknowledge.

The pharaohs & other members of the ruling class were free to not be circumcised by the long span of Egyptian history.

Maintaining the dominance hierarchy, celebrating the fewer alpha-males, is just a rudimentary model of the same thing. It might not be any amount of the same brutality, but it does allow for others to make excuses to not be moral. For what – so that you can impress others?

The rulers of these tribes were suggested to control slaves by neutralizing their sexuality, sometimes with even castration.

The ancient Greeks were proud that they were intact, unlike their neighbors in the Near East.

The Greeks expanding their empire after Alexander The Great, after 336 B.C., tried to civilize these savages.

They will not teach this in schools generically. This requires to not be “spoon fed.”

The Greeks banned it & castration where they could find it. They tried to stop it for the He*****.

The Romans tried even harder to abolish it & castration. They punished perpetrators with death & confiscation of property.

I will not concede: “But those Romans & Greeks were alpha males.” WRONG. Alpha-males, whatever divisions of various groups, features domination of others by a greedy fewer. The Romans, Greeks, Christians, which by the way features the ultimate archetypal hated nice-guy – Jesus, were legion compared to the fewer. (Not that I’m Christian.) Warriors don’t really want to do it: They’re usually commanded by a  few, so they use some fake aesthetic.

Thousands more years later: Victorian doctors did not know much about anatomy, physiology, epidemiology. They thought that amputation & bleeding were curatives. This differs from the alpha males because the others mentioned did castrations, etc., for controlling slaves. Doctors were trying to help. Clumsy, but they tried.

They borrowed ideas of circumcision from the J*** because that’s what they had.

Circumcision became confused with the understanding of “hygiene” because cutters warned that bathed intact penises would cause arousal.

If you believe everything the normal media states, you are an idiot.

The 19th century had attempts of making Christians of North/West extract accept male genital mutilation. They’re morality & health was still considered worse with the hierarchy, & Christianity gives little emphasis of doing the dominance hierarchy.

During the late 1890s, MGM was encouraged by an admittedly eugenics persuasion. Didn’t know that, did you, as you were watching your Rom-com?

MGM is alpha-male social engineering. It was a small Cabal, one of which was Abraham L. Wolbarst, who wanted the imposing routinely done on newborn boys in the west. A.L. Wolbarst was one of the most influential for ruining the freedoms of Western people, just like in Ancient Egypt.

When you see these comedy shows featured by cable-tv: ‘Who Is Merica,’ or whatever it’s called, again, it’s designed to distract you.

The best-selling magazine of the 1940s era: ‘Parents’ was published by Dr. Alan F. Guttmacher. A secret about him is that he was the director of the American Eugenics Society.

You have been fooled by alpha-males. They are clever, but not smart. There’s a difference. The fact that you have been purchasing self-help guides for how to be that is just proof that it is now social engineering, originating by deficient nutrition they experienced with extremely dry conditions, so you are aspiring to freaks. Yeah, there’s SOME scientific validity to those self-help guides, mainly the part of alpha-males being few, which makes others crave that, but it’s mostly just based by the “Top-Ammo” trends. People crave what is exclusively small numbers, inscrutable. It’s why people will pay for expensive RARE, meaningless junk. Neglecting actual objective thought process, the rest is sold with subtle inflammatory surges: “It was the Valkyries mythology.” “It’s the bad-ass Yakuza, who have to replace organs due to health problems of excessive tattoo ink,” “It’s the artist $00.15, or whatever his stupid name is, “It’s the archetypes of Jordan Peterson,” “It’s the underground experimentalism of  Boyd Rice,” etc., etc.. When males employ all of that, it’s mostly a gimmick. The main way that most males experience this alpha-male phenomena is the same way that you crave chemically modified foods, & females usually want glamour. Glamour isn’t real. Even those actors have problems. It’s a farce, a sham, a travesty. Claims that “an alpha male can have healthy levels of both intellectual & dominating features” are not defining alpha males. Those are just sane males.

Abraham Ravish was one of the most active lobby agents during the 1950s to penalize intact males & either deny them insurance protection or charge them a hefty surcharge.

One of the only respectable ones was Dr. Spock, who had the courage to admit his mistake.

The 1970 edition of the country’s urological textbook claimed for another generation of medical students that a long foreskin causes “rectal prolapse,” epistaxis (nose bleed), & a list of other false claims.

Cutters charge $121.00-$300.00 per cutting [circa: 2002]. 150-200 cutting session per year is enough to make $60,000 extra. That’s enough to provide glamour for whores by instilling the pecking-order on other males due to their  “failure” of not being certified as “alpha” just by being born.

Cutters are collecting between $145-million & $360-million. That’s only the amount cutters take home. There’s related “hidden” fees for hospitals & doctors.

The foreskin has also been commodified without permission or knowledge of the Majority of the Western. Pharmaceutical companies use it for the manufacturing of drugs & other experiments & profits. One foreskin contains enough genetic matter to grow 250,000 square feet of skin.

According to Forbes magazine, the annual market for it could be $1 billion-$2 billion. ~$1 million worth of baby-penis-derived products has been sold to Procter & Gamble, & others.

The Food & Drug Administration has given approval to biotechnology firms. During January 1998, the FDA gave a respected human rights attorney only 5 minutes to give to the committee why MGM is unethical.

During 1986, Aaron J. Fink invented the myth that MGM prevents human immunodeficiency virus/acquired immunodeficiency syndrome.

During 1973, a trio consisting Melvin L. Selzer, et al, published an article insinuating that anyone who didn’t agree with their agenda is “mentally ill.”

Capitalism is state sponsored usury. (It’s also a religion to a particular people.) The communist system is one of taking all property for the state.

The Capitalist philosopher: Ayn Rand was an advertiser of this will of Capitalism. Capitalism transfers wealth to the plutocratic, incorporated with a globalist agenda, taking control by ownership. With corrupt money lending (usury) as a weapon to control bonded/debt slaves, cosmopolitan capitalism eventuates the plantation state as Communism –  only to labour to pay their DEBTS. This is the cycle of Usury –  consumer/slave labour, with the “soul” diminished ( A communist idea – equality).

If you stop female consumption entitlements, this boycotts the state by alpha-males.

There’s some merits to Capitalism, but not significantly. That’s why you see a “Star-dick’s” Cafe on what seems to be almost every street corner instead of a bookstore. There isn’t a good market for people to have discipline & time for themselves to learn more because capitalism creates the conditions of what would otherwise  be a means to some result, but is no longer that means, but the main life itself. Actors make lots of money, but they are not producing anything of value: they are EQUAL to the homeless person that plays his acoustic guitar for spare money.




Nepal’s earthquake forces ‘living goddess to break decades of seclusion – theguardian-dot-com

What Your Doctor May Not Tell You About Circumcision | Paul M. Fleiss, M.D. & Frederick M Hodges, D.Phil, pg 96-146

Capitalism, Communism, Christianity, Cohen Control by HP Mageson666

STOP Calling It Hypergamy. It’s Just GREED, Nothing More. | Jessie Nagy

my future

I know: “This guy is running out of ideas. I’m bored of this.” That’s not the importance. The importance is: There are opinions, cultural beliefs, etc., that people want to invoke by choosing only the less relevant analysis, or another. You can choose A philosophical report that states practically almost whatever you want. The press will sometimes find a single article: “Here’s a new truth.” But for an emergent scientific truth to become an objective truth, it needs to be concentrated multiple times. This is SUPPOSED to be boring.

This is obviously why political correctness is an enemy to freedom-of-speech. It retards further science

I don’t repeat because of a lame mind. Besides, this isn’t about me; it’s about a message. I repeat because I have to concentrate it all.

It requires accumulation of concentration so that 2-4, 5-6 years by now, this will be well known. Stockholm Syndrome, Female Hybristophilia – very common, female rape fantasy, female sexual selection, etc., has been documented, & yet most people are amoral to these realities because they are converted to entertainment or it is blamed on the male. This is why more aspects about it need to be gathered. It requires an entire system of structured axioms. That’s the point of being boring.

The reason they tortured Jesus Christ (not that I’m a Christian) is because he was a moral-male.

One of the problems is that females automatically assume that their judgement should be the standard. Their father’s judgement will even be different.

If you’re a woman who states that you changed your mind when you were 25, you are not an exception. You don’t have a rebuttal.

Women fucking lame males, often rejected, were alone with x number of children with badly guided conduct. What did governments do? Did they blame most males? Did they take taxes of moral males?

“Doormat” – “Oh, look: he did his duty & compromised. What a loser.”

1988, The Journal: Nature, John Cairns, with his article: ‘The Origins Of Mutants,'[1] found one of the most important results of biological science: John Cairns took bacteria that had a defective enzyme for it – lactase. Lactase is an enzyme that processes lactose, & that enzyme is necessary to process the sugar to extract the energy & the structuring process so the bacteria can use the lactose as a food source to power its growth & process. These bacteria that Cairns used had defective enzymes. They can’t eat lactose, so he takes these bacteria, he puts them in a petri dish, & the only food he puts in the petri dish is lactose. Without anything to eat, they can’t divide, & when they can’t divide, they can’t reproduce the DNA, which is generally the source of how the mutations happen, so the result is they can’t divide, they can’t change, so there should be no positive results. What was found though in all the petri dishes after a few days, there was bacteria growing in all of them. Conventional understanding is that shouldn’t happen.

Cairns found that bacteria can choose which mutations they can produce. Mutations can occur as a result of adapting, so they are not necessarily random.

This is a worthy strife, much more so than the neglect of the masculine self for impressing females/society. If those mutations can happen, we can change gynocentrism completely.

This is why I’m not like other researchers. They only report. They don’t offer solutions.

The spleen is a fist-size organ near the stomach.[2] It filters out old cells & helps the immune system. The spleen additionally serves as a reservoir of oxygen-carrying red blood cells; when it contracts, it gives the body an oxygen boost, allowing you to retain breath for more time.

Larger spleens – 50% larger – suggest more diving time for the Bajau, & it didn’t seem to make a difference whether a Bajau was a diver or not.

Though evolution is typically described on the order of millions of years, the Bajou have been diving like this, with breath-retention, for only thousands. ( The mutation of the previously typed petri dish culture was only a matter of days.) It is evolution by a relatively short time span.

It has been reported that the spleen alteratthis isn’t an adaptation to “harsh condition.” It’s co-evolution of cultures.

A career-woman with extremely unrealistic desires tries to hinder Stefan Molyneux[3] by his interview during ~27:00 minutes of it. (Free-domain-Radio) He keeps his composure & completely makes her register his thoughts. It could’ve been fake/practical “listening” by her, but still a very good demonstration.

If we get enough males to be converted, we can have more alert males to understand what is serious control of women, not the casual kind.

A study on the ‘Dark Triad’ traits – Machiavellianism, psychopathy, narcissism – was conducted to analyze mating strategies.

Some professionals will pause claims of the allure of psychopathy, etc., for women, yet anecdotes world-wide of it by various males is frequent.

With a speed dating study[4], narcissism was “positively” associated with both types of relationships – long & short-term. Narcissists like each other.

When a male says that he needs some time for himself, this isn’t “insecurity.” It’s that they want more information. Information is power. Relationships with females take a lot of important time of a male’s life. As much as some females like to say that they “like” intellectual males, that’s all superficial. Most relationships, especially because of females, are mostly instincts. It’s good for intellectual males to command females, but they can only choose their words VERY, VERY carefully. This is largely due to female narcissism. Intellectual males have to do extra compartmentalizing.

Women rated psychopathy as alluring for short-term relationships. The old saying “nice guys finish last,” sorry to say, & this is by HER selection. It’s why moral males get basically what is equal to scraps when women “mature.” These aren’t “beta” males, or whatever. This is just simply an aspect of female nature that many are preserving.

I remember this happening to me so many times when I used to go to clubs: Females who were already sexually involved with another male would look at me distinctively as an invitation, their male partners would get angry to me instead of her. What they saw – those whores – was a somewhat tall guy wearing all black as some kind of punishing villain. I remember this fucking cunt started to change her style in a space I was frequenting for a short while, hoping that I would take her so that she could replace her other partner. I wasn’t even slightly attracted to this ugly cunt, & after he gets angry to me instead, again, she joins him mocking me, etc..

Males with significant scores for the Dark Triad tests were suggested to be more indiscriminate than most.[5] Of other words: they mostly just want to have sex.

Psychopaths, etc., especially male, are associated with being more sociosexual – the typical “faggot” choice of words to moral-males, much less restricted, having less loyalty, & willing to “take” other females already involved. These women allow it.

Women, however, tend to be more selective for both long & short terms. As a function for the fact that males tend to be eager for sexual exploration, females do not have to make their standards more realistic. That’s why the archetypes of female sexuality is ‘slaughtering beast meets beauty’: They still often want a psychopath, just not necessarily a mundane one.

Yes, males do often want more sex & more freedom. That is a much, for BOTH, better model than for the male to be a servant with lame bonding for a whore’s inconsistent goals.

I believe the Dark Triad Study was just insufficient. However, the major emphasis was that psychopathy was correlated to short-term preference. Don’t think this is “noble virtue,” or something, because what it means is she wants the psychopath to fuck her “brains out,” then leave you with the “payment bill for the expenses of the damaged walls & furniture in the room.”

A creation of an interactive environment that is composed of limited kindness by psychopathy is selection by females.

What’s your definition of psychopathy anyway? The guy she doesn’t like coming to the female to attempt to school her on one of her PMS days, to which she then conflates as a “psychopath,” which makes her a psychopath, or the war-lord who uses people the way he wants, with tons of profit & fame, she would be opportunistic towards? you might want to think about that FIRST before compiling numbers, etc..

It has been suggested that DT personalities evolved as coordinators of men’s short-term mating strategies.[6] During antiquated times, life was scanty, so exploration of males reduced bounding.

Women rated DT – Dark Triad – characters as significantly more attractive. women are undeveloped, jejune, infantine, callow, unfledged.

So women do also prefer (like men), for short-terms anyway, attractive facial & bodily attractiveness.[7]

She wants more, more, more, & more.

Narcissism is defined by a sense of entitlement, dominance & grandiose self-view. This is actually the majority of women, & yet society is more likely to attribute that to males. The reason that is is because females own the selective process, so they determine masculine peculiarities by who they “cherry pick.” Yes, females actually DOMINATE the social.

I even believe that narcissism with males was an adaptive trait due to scanty environments.

The males who have had more experiences with sexual encounters with females know or intuit that the rewards with being serious with a female are often minimal & dire/traps: “Thanks for the divorce bill because of your menopause.”

I believe that the Machiavellian males also ruin sexuality for other males.

Male psychopathy – callousness, lack of empathy, antisocial, & being erratic – is a product of somatosensory affective disorder of males. That’s what most of these studies regarding patriarchal males disregards. Females create more of those traits because they ruin sexual interaction by the mass incitement they initiate.

With females mainly seeing body language, etc., they associate serious conscientiousness of males with neuroticism. They associate precipitation of males with “value.” I know it’s not the best example, these type of men would be wiped out with a situation of a mass global warming worse than any we’ve heard of because they wouldn’t know what to do with it, & they would be with a state of having gained self gratification, for a lack of a better description, rather than any quality plans. They wouldn’t be able to have agreeableness. The past success of sporting, fishing, etc., was relatively easy, uncomfortable, but easy. The patient males who would have brought something different would’ve been interrogated, not by positive curiosity, for “getting out of line.” We are now having the consequences of female dominance, used with male dominance, of abuse of our society lacking gradual knowledge, rendering society to mechanical animals. This isn’t some Feminist definition, but the patriarchy is real. It’s just that females continue it.

These ‘Dark Triad’ studies have a typical tendency of reporting the males with DT traits being prone to deceit. However, it is more likely that females enjoy being deceived, & the reports do state that the DT personality is indeed attractive to women[8]. Females do like certain drama. They really do. It’s the similar situations of people who have inferiority complexes trying to start random fights, etc., for a sense of meaning, excitement. Women lack imagination, so they would enjoy more drama to compensate for that.

Anyway, any kind of surveying done to women is generally scattered with incomplete, dishonest answers. Surveying studies are not as reliable as people think when applied to females. Science might have more numbers, etc., but it tends to lack wisdom.

The main themes of these DT studies was that females are suggested to like ‘bad boys’ for SHORT-TERM purposes. Thanks, I get some sagging garbage later. What a “prize.” Thanks for wasting time & massive portions of civilization – sarcasm. Selection by females results with only minimal-dimensional & often fake (or postponed) proficiency. When you get the typical discourse of male & female, it just becomes nothing, for a lack of a better word. They just slander realism.

Scientists have discovered that testosterone does NOT cause the common caricature of egocentrism, etc., of masculinity[9]. The popular art, etc., has portrayed Testosterone as an agent of risky behaviour, etc.. Subscribers of this will now be embarrassed.

The belief was enhanced more when research seemed to confirm this: Castrating male rodents reduced combative tendencies. The inference by these zoological experiments producing the “same” effects with humans have been proven wrong.

Test subjects that were administered enhanced T. level generally made fairer offers than those who received placebos.

The research suggests that the hormone increases sensitivity to status. For wild specimens, such as rats, with relatively simple social systems, an increased concern with status expresses itself with aggression. This is what I’ve always been saying: ZOOLOGICAL MODELS ARE NOT GOOD ENOUGH. Almost everyone of pro-masculine content, or admittedly anti-male critics, use zoological models, like the fucking POSEURS that they are – stooges who can’t even have significant conclusions. Prosocial, not “dominance,” actions secure status. It’s the complicated, differentiated environmental, factors, like gynocentrism, that have been suggested to contribute to aggression, not the T..

The ones who received the placebos ACTED the most aggressive. I repeat: ACTED. It is as embarrassing to have a situation of feigning intoxication when the owner of the cafe in Amsterdam tells them: “These are not hash-brownies. They’re just regular brownies.” These are not real masculine males. They are persuaded by feminine trends.

More[10] recent research suggests that T. enhances decisive activity rather than dominance attempting behaviour. To use one of my favorite axioms: This is not an issue of semantics. You know what is meant.

Varying social status is determined by male interaction influenced by females. The aggression found with those cases would be different than the purifying tests.

UNDERLINED:When a man is sometimes socially dominant, it’s not T. that is the main factor. [11]Yukako Inoue, et al, found that it’s social customs that is the main factor. T. only modulates social dominance, but it isn’t the source of it.

It’s interesting that T. is actually more associated with sexuality, yet the culture converts it from that to aggression because females shift male sexuality. You witness males subduing being reposeful with it due to feminine fraternization. What females do, or the other version is calling the male “empty,” “lacking depth,” is they claim or imply “objectification” to them if the male doesn’t give them artistry first. They do this so THEY can objectify the male.

T. is associated with aggression somewhat, but it’s more complicated than that.[12] Menelaos L. Batrinos confirms that cortisol & serotonin form a triad, antagonistic with T., controlling the effects of T.. “Don’t be a nice-guy” are misguiding maxims which are misguided by the specious ideas of T. automatically thought to be aggression promoters. If there is a defection of that triad, you have prisoner types of actions, so the model of “don’t be a nice guy” is based on one that celebrates a defective chemical triad: they are celebrating broken men.

This is the hypocrisy of society when we allow females to dictate that different/intellectual males “creepy,” or whatever. Because women mainly understand some kind of force, the general way that he can be verified, rather than boring discourse, which is something women try to control, is by displaying dominance over other males, making him become a part of the herd. Since intellectual/different males generally don’t do this, what women & their little guard-dogs do is slander him as some sort of lunatic with conduct disorder.

A study on 4179[13] veterans concerning aggression did give data that basal T. was suggested to be the reason. Did these investigators stop to realize that the groups they were studying were VETERANS – already primed to kill? They most likely had something wrong with that chemical triad.

However, the supraphysiological doses of T. of 200 mg weekly, even 600, administered to normal comparative men had no effect to aggression or anger.

Women were reported[14] to be more attracted to the Machiavellian types during their most fertile periods. Of other words: They’ll give the most ecstatic sexuality to those types, but won’t give the same dedication to father types – a trap for fathers to be used & a willingness to give to the antithesis of the characteristics of discipline. What kind of transactions is that? Because of that, they don’t deserve benefits.

Referring again to the citation regarding mutations: If enough males are converted to the truth that females lack serious ethics, & other truths, we can create enough extreme conditions of which the female will have to assimilate to some degrees, switching a greed based transaction to, instead, an ethics based one mediated by masculine affectivity. Females are also impressionable

Ethics have much more power over the way we live than people think: For example: If the food we’re bombarded with is saturated with harmful products because some greedy idiot wanted to make a profit to try to have a collection of potential whores, society becomes addicted, lazy, & accustomed to that market, depreciating other businesses. Job-markets become bankrupt because of reasons like: “That health-food just isn’t tasty” – cause & effect. A nation of people with minds almost like babies is the result.

If enough men join the military to acquire goods with the excuse of “stamina,” or whatever, which is really a bunch traitorous men, 5-10 years later, you’ve angered an entire other group who will scheme to retaliate. These idiots would probably injure their room-mates if it benefited them.

E-commerce,[15] additionally to the incentive that ” You can start selling cheaper, then alter a $15.99 item priced to $45.99,” has ruined entire stores, so now there’s less jobs for others who were content with not being greedy. This isn’t a problem of “bad genetics.” It’s people who wanted to live their own lives & their own set of tasks. They have less choice of jobs.

I think that a lot of people don’t seriously have souls – the ones who want everyone to be pretty much the same, saying stupid things like “smile.” “You look kind of shady.” “You know, you should start dressing more maturely.” This paragraph isn’t science. This is metaphysics. It’s valid. They have appetites that make them neglect definitive traits. Even the “anti-normies” are like that. Just a different version.

Thanks to fucking whores installing the playing-fields, other males who aren’t of the smaller subset are called “losers” & told to “man up” for capriciousness.

It’s just anecdotal, but now with trends I’ve noticed that talking to a female on the sidewalk can be “harrassment,” but asking for what they call hook-ups with the internet isn’t.

Charles Darwin, who isn’t like a god, but he said: “Ignorance more frequently begets confidence than does knowledge.”

All these idiot with their pretentious college degrees: women’s studies, etc., are experiencing Dunning-Kruger effect.

You can be favorable & still primitive.

Studies give that convicted criminals are usually less[16] intelligent. But what about people like neocons? Neocons are really not much different than common man. They have minds of the majority.

The problem is the majority is not only stupid, but also ignorant, immature/conceited, trying to get series of temporary instant gratification.

The only “merit” any voter needs to do that is to be 18.

Most voters spend hours watching tv. & reading lame journalism. Their opinions are controlled by what’s featured by that.

The real power is not by the politicians. Those are mostly facades. The real power is by who controls the media. The best way to make people ignorant & obedient is to strictly limit the thought-process of what is acceptable, but allow somewhat hyper debate. It’s a scam.

The gobbling omnivorous don’t have real intelligence. They’re only prehensile as intemperate. Real intelligence is patient & withdrawn by being engrossed with input.

& what are opinions anyway? Not facts. People are operating with the subjective with Yelling-Idol culture, without the self-awareness of metacognition – The Dunning-Kruger effect.

Assuming the role of provider is how we even got these problems firstly.

American values are founded on GREED – very feminine, of course, the military would persuade those types, which results with certain undesirable politics/more distractions.

Being introverted is a good thing. If you try to cancel that, you’re anti-male because males are various.

If you’re promoting “alpha” – ~5% of unnattainable masculinity that females want – nonsense/female greed/female proxy control, you’re undermining your own masculinity.

With gynocentrism, the task of understanding other thought-processes to be accepted is hindered by female proxy control. They control by having minimal males control for them.

The Dunning-Kruger research presents that training for a task, such as solving a logic puzzle, increases people’s ability to evaluate themselves.[17] Denial is a very common thing, especially by rule of gynocentrism.

When the female mental state is significantly determined by female consensus appeasement, narcissism, not actual competence, is preserved & the miscalibration factor is doled to others.

A comparative study of Japanese & American people presented that Japanese people (even though they have “perfectionist”/suicidal culture, which is also probably that their shame-honer processing is often faster, while Western is slower – traps by facade maintenance, but that’s for another study) tended to underestimate their abilities, & tended to treat failure[18] as an opportunity to improve, thus increasing value. What a revolutionary concept to females. That whole concept – understanding mistakes as realism – is shamed by females.

So we have more cultures maintaining the unrealistic facades of the “stoic” male, thanks to idiots like Jordan Peterson, instead of doing the real honorable thing of making more attention to male experience, which, yes, includes male pain as a REAL aspect happenning many times, because that would ruin his profit of his pop. info-tainment, attaining a profit with his fake nonsense sustained on what is literally folklore. Because of that, female mate choice copying is continued by facades: When selecting a mate, women tend to evaluate by the basis of what other women like. What other women like is the facades that is so pervasive.

Studies prove that fems. are attracted when they see other females smiling or interacting[19] with other males. This is also why females don’t like serious intellectual males (Jordan Peterson is not one): all that time that is required to research, socializing is minimized. When those males come to females, they generally don’t have other accompanying people, so she can’t decide based on others’ entertainment. Of other words, this is a very non-constructive psychology of females because they complain: “All the good men are taken,” but what is actually happening, with them not even realizing how their minds work – “following her heart,” is that they fixate on the taken guys, neglecting new things. It’s not only an aspect of avarice – “look what she has,” it’s more confirmation that women are anti-science/anti-realism because science is a “solitary” thing.

It’s why you see females superficially joining sectors of the men’s rights activism just because they’ve seen a potential prospect of some trends due to female men’s rights activists, yet when the males present the hazards of circumcision, mostly psychological, they usually don’t care.

This aspect of female mate selection is maladaptive[20].

& I quote from a scientific study (‘Negative Information in Mate-Choice Copying’ Susana A. M. Varela, et al – UABDivulga):

“A new gene conferring the males a higher fitness may not spread in the population because most females will mate with the unfit, common male & the inexperienced females will copy this behaviour. This generates a frequency-dependent bias, or the pressure to conform to the majority view: something that social psychologists know to be a barrier for the spreading of novel cultural traits.”

It’s why females are the easiest to equip with the slander of “He’s like Eliot Rodger. He’s a pervert.”

Initially, females can be attracted for as something as stupid as a man using a certain new application on his phone, but all of a sudden, you make one slight alteration, it’s all stopped because one of her female peers states that the way he talked “didn’t sound right.”

So when you’re doing a stressful job, etc., your risking your pans to her gossiping with one of her female associates about you by the basis of facades, which is what Jordan Peterson espouses while neglecting the fact that, & this supposedly acclaimed man should know this, According to the National Center for Health Statistics, women start two-thirds of the divorces. What’s more: College educated couples will have the female divorce rate initiated by the wife with a 90% rate. [21] There are many interpretations to this trend, most of which are gynocentric, like that Jordan Peterson idiot, yet the real reasons are obvious. Jordan Peterson claims: Go win the proposal test, but he edits that there’s still MORE tests.

The other confirm of females wanting a male validated by other females, of this context, past ones, is that females do, whether they even realize it or not, like doubtingly committed males.

Another valid anecdote: At one of my past professions, a customer came to me to ask where a certain item was located. I told him “I don’t do this department, but he might know,” pointing to what I did not know during that time was a surveillance-pseudo-shopper. His stalking job got known. He & others got angry to me. It wasn’t my fault though because no one told me that was his job. The reason no one told me was because most working there were unprofessional, so I get blamed for it instead of the unprofessional people. The main manager, who could’ve told me, even made sexual jokes to female co-workers (before the me-too trend) with multiple witnesses. They were entertained. So I was one of the only few professional people there, & the surveillance-pseudo-shopper looked for other reasons to try to get me to lose that job. This guy had a quota for how many thieves who could catch. I ruined just only ONE profit, & he becomes predatory to me because his mentality was that if one profit is lost, what will his whore think of him?

It’s only now that female nature is becoming more obvious, with Feminism becoming more popular, do you see women becoming malevolent – because it benefits them – to the same exact males they would’ve hailed a year prior to the me-too phenomena for not being “too nice” & establishing REALISTIC communication. Those perennial profit seekers benefit female greed. Those males with cancelled realism benefit their egos, until their ego is being presented to the masses, which then has females use those males – another benefit.

Yes, I am anti-women (“anti” means disenfranchised of this context). The way society is deals with much more complex human processes than just political “isms.” Feminism is just a distraction. Anti-feminism is not enough.


1: The origin of mutants by John Cairns – Nature #335, pg. 142-145 (1988) or nature-dot-com

2: Diving deep on one breath could be in a ‘sea nomad’s’ DNA by Michael Nedelman – cnn-dot-com

3: Shocking! ForMer Feminists Ticking Biological Clock Causes Major Panic! | Stefan Molyneux – Freedomainradio

4: How Alluring Are Dark Personalities? The Dark Triad & Attractiveness in Speed Dating, Emanuel Jauk, et al – wiley-dot-com

5: Mate-selection & the Dark Triad: Facilitating a short-term mating strategy & creating a volatile environment, Peter K. Jonason, et al – elsevier-dot-com

6: The Dark Triad personality: Attractiveness to women, Gregory Louis Carter, et al – scottbarrykaufman-dot-com

7: Ibid, 1.

8: Ibid, pg 4

9: Testoserone does not induce aggression, study shows | University of Zurich – sciencedaily-dot-com

10: Testosterone promotes either dominance or submissiveness in the Ultimatum Game depending on players’ social rank by Yukako Inoue – nature-dot-com

11: Ibid.

12: Testosterone & Aggressive Behavior in Man by Menelaos L. Batrinos – ncbi-dot-nlm-dot-gov

13: Ibid.

14: Dads or Cads? Women’s Strateguc Decisions in the mating Game by Susan J. Aitken, et al, pg 1 of PDF – pipubs-dot-com

15: Online shopping will ruin local business in the long run, says Woodbridge Chamber chairman by Anthony G. Attrino – nj-dot-com

16: Why losers have delusions of grandeur by Post Staff Report – nypost-dot-com

17: Revisiting why incompetents think they’re awsome by Chris Lee – arstechnica-dot-com

18: Divergent consequences of success & failure in Japan & North America: An investigation of self-improving motivations & Malleable selves. Steven J., et al – apa-dot-org

19: Mate choice copying & why all the good guys are taken by Hanan Parvez – psychMechanics

20: Negative Information in Mate Choice Copying by Susana A. M. Varela, et al – uab-dot-cat

21: 10 Surprising Reasons Women Turn To Divorce by Cindy Holbrook – yourtango-dot-com

A Message To The Female MRA | Jessie Nagy

changing whores

I don’t have a lot to type with this one, just:

These anti-feminist women don’t seriously care about male experience, not significantly anyway. They’re only involved with some of the pro-male spaces because they saw some videos of female MRAs, so now there is a potential prospect of something being potentially trendy.

Whenever I disclose the issue of male circumcision, most of those same females give little concern. This is proof that they’re not really seriously interested.

Female MRAs can be “cheer leaders,” but they have no right to own any of it.

That’s what my agenda is really about – REAL domination by masculinity.

Science operates by giving statements, then collecting information to confirm those statements.

If you think you know me by calling me an “incel,” or whatever, that itself is not scientific.

What women do is opine & assume, then claim those are “valid” statements.

As much as I’m concerned, I categorize these female anti-feminists as anti-male as others anyway.

Why We Need Attitudes Of Implacability To Females | Jessie Nagy

A diet of lots of sugar basically keeps you constantly hungry.[1]

The official government dietary guide for eating “healthy” is dangerously wrong.[2] The new food diagram, like the old, is the product of the marriage of politics & Big Agra lobbying. Actual nutrition is of little concern. The USDA is determined by commerce. It’s also the reason why two-thirds of Americans are too heavy. 29 million Americans have type 2 diabetes. 19 million have it but don’t know it. 79 million have pre-diabetes.

The USDA is promoting food, such as too much carbohydrates, that will make you obese/addicted, make you ill, lethargic, & kill your nerves.

Nutritional programs – SNAP, WIC, etc. – involved with government money have children served potato chips as a vegetable, a container of bad orange juice as (concentrated sugar) as a fruit at schools. [3] Poor milk consisting of lots of sugar by the form of lactose ( & skim milk is really “scam” milk: they removed the fat, which is healthy when consuming milk, & left the sugar), flavored yogurt, containing both lactose & sugar, are encouraged in schools cafeterias. Official government recommendations initiate the what is the future of nerve damage.

Most whole-wheat bread sold in supermarkets is nothing but white flour dyed brown & each slice contains a hefty dose of of H.F.C.S. (high fructose corn syrup).

You thought soy was good? It’s not. It contains phytoestrogens, which mimic natural estrogen. This is bad for males: It causes testosterone imbalance & less sperm count.[4] While it does contain some nutritional proteins, it contains numerous antinutrients, resulting with growth problems for children, disrupt endocrine function, & other factors. Asian cuisines process it differently, but most Western versions are worse.

The only thing really worth eating is standard vegetables, related plant foods, & not much else.

4 grams of sugar is equal to 1 teaspoon. Metric numbers baffle Americans, which food manufacturers happily exploit.[5]

With most phases of the marketplace, we are being seduced & betrayed.

You’ve paid for the faulty food information with your tax dollars. Your money collecting is largely for gynocentrsim, yet it is tricking you.

This tricking is like the tobacco phenomena.

With the female ego promoted by gynocentrism, there is minimized time for males to learn more about the world & it’s application to the self, especially because females promote the “daring confidence” – not seriously being aware of surroundings.

With the female ego promoted, it is not realized that men love deeply. It is projected by gynocentrism that a male “should not be bound to one woman”/”keep options open,” also known as “don’t put women on a pedestal.”

Women are fickle & superficial by nature, so they hop from one situation to another due to moments of alternating emotions. Women & society calls this “deep emotions,” when men are truly much more passionate.

Spare the “nobody owes him anything” thing. This completely deflects that females freedom will not be measured by how well she pair-bonds, instead, by how she indulges with cheap entertainment, etc..

If some of these guys who resort to hitting a female were to do that to a male, they’d be treated with indifference, some would be entertained, even glorified as a hero. If a male tries to get revenge on a female, “oh, no.” Many males are even hailed for killing for profit, or something, & females have had all of those types featured by their entertainment & suspense themes.

I get the police called on me numerously because I come to them with no entertainment, telling them science-news of how disgusting they are, so they call the police on me, hoping that I’ll get beaten to a state of being crippled.

The latter is from what the popular parlance would call “benevolent sexism.” This “benevolent sexism” keeps many female personality disorders guarded.

Women “needing protection” is way over-blown. They like to keep this less evolved psychological trait confined to other males because it gives females the will to edit their surroundings to a “nicely painted picture.” That’s all it is. There’s no real harm to them. Women like that are “normal” idiots, for a lack of a better description, with a sense of entitlement – a core facet of narcissism,[6] who despise any sign of something being just a little bit askew. These women, which is an extremely frequent amount, feel an obsessive “need” to control others to take command.

Hostile sexism is that women are intellectually inferior to men. This contrasting form is also called misogyny. Misogyny will help males stop being distracted with strife with each other & make them realize the more serious problem. Better them than us males.

The attitude that you “can’t” get revenge to females” has maintained the meme that females are wonderful creatures who “shit out cotton candy,” &, as I’ve typed, sugar is very harmful. Facades are deceiving.

A logical revolution as to why females should experience receiving revenge isn’t “fake news.”

Trump/”Fake news” allegations isn’t even really right-wing. He’s a show-man/con-man, but that’s a whole other article.

Females, especially when younger mostly want to experiment, breaking males who are better than that.

This was all started by chivalry, & not even the passionate kind I describe.

Commercialism is traditionalism. This isn’t an issue of semantics. You know what is meant. Commerce promotes the female ego. Traditionalism promotes the female ego. Feminism promotes the female ego. Traditionalism is Feminism, albeit another version.

Regarding the sexes, particularly women, is among the most difficult to deliver; the writer is stimulating the limbic impulses of others. Their poor ability to control it interferes with serious analysis. People who operate excessively with the limbic impulses, people who are addicted to entertainment, who can’t even make serious conclusions, namely extroverted people, for a lack of a better description, have mental disorders.

The reason that realists reporting on this get dismissed as bitter is because deflectors have no conception of origination.

Thanks to female nature, the young man without the mental disorders who “waits for marriage” in the contemporary West is likely either to wait too long or to be divorced within a shortened period.

Being respectful to women is used as anti-science to promote gynocentrism. If you accept the obligation of respect for female personality disorder, you can’t get rid of the “knight in shining armor” that stops serious realizations. So let’s rather put freedom of speech as a standard, but not for the sake of being provocateurs merely to say things like “cuck” only to seem “edgy” by using taboo words for fun, or whatever.

Male & female nature can be constant on the casual level, but they are often disclosed to be different in certain circumstances.

The feminist/traditionalist consensus is that men are primarily responsible for women’s problems.

The demigoddesses – Norns – of the ancient north were regarded as being allowed to allot life & determining man’s destiny[7]. This is the prototype to northern chivalry. You could almost describe it as a sort of infatuated “pornography.”

It is like the idea that women give life to men. No. Men give life. We make with nothing – women – by shooting sperm.

The Norns are choosy. They do not owe anything to anyone.[8] Hmm, how have we heard this before? They’d owe something to a warrior, wouldn’t they? People use warrior like it’s a necessity & that it has a morally non-ambigious meaning.

They communicate with images & CRYPTIC words. Hmmm, how have we heard of this poor communication before?

Meanwhile, as chivalry was minimized with other regions: Only after the colonial era in Africa was polygamy seen as a taboo.[9]

Western/Northern culture is great with innovation, etc., but one department they lack skill is with sexuality.

Male-owned polygamy is very normal across Kenya, especially due to the further popularization by Akuku Danger who has more than 100 wives.

The western association most related to that practice is the Mormons. If more of Western/Northern society cancelled chivalry & adopted something like Mormon practices, we’d have a better society.

Why practice the search for greed when you can have the search for something else?

I’m sorry, monogamy is often a social construct, mostly controlled by women. Male desires became “sinful.” You’ve been scammed, guys. A male can ejaculate many loads. There is only minimal use of eggs at a time available during a female’s fertilization[10]

The modern “enlightened” are insulted & trivialize/humor that a man can have more for himself. Why?

While I believe that males have a much better sense of loyalty/romance than the females, there’s still other extremely smart males who should also be allowed to practice male-owned polygamy.

Ogwella Akuku sired almost 200 children.[11]

West/Northern guys, you have some competition.

Owned women by male-centric polygamy report that they do not mind because a co-wife(+) reduces chores when more than one woman is doing them.

With all the changing/masked reasons by women, they have the potentiality of cheating increased[12], so males might as well preserve their own states. Really, a report by Global-News stated that the rate of married women who have cheated has increased. It’s because of things like chivalry, with whichever name of it you prefer. Social networks has given them more access to cheat.

Male owned polygamy IS how you strengthen North/Western family values.

Modern medicine by commerce – it’s praised. It actually has a tendency of retarding us. Instead of making us better for long-terms, it makes us more dependent. The quality of man-kind is reduced. (Man = kind. Woman = unkind.) Life expectancy is more, but that’s largely delusion. Life expectancy is more because of artificial “quality.”

We all have access to the truth, reality, but others are living with denial. The sooner reality “hits them in the fucking face,” the better.

What mistakes do modern men learn by? We need to create societies that reports of female ills so that we don’t have stupidity & denial & rewards for female personality disorders.

Initially, it’s the alcohol & other stupid experimentation. When older, it’s another form of commerce the male has to waste his life with.

America – society driven by greed. Greed, greed, greed, & more greed. You can look at some of these idiots on the internet, selling stuff. They talk about how many units they sell of pollution. Units? What did he sell? We don’t know, & they probably don’t even know. They don’t care. It’s all about profit for them. People obsessed with commerce are dumb. Really, really dumb because the greed overrides all sense. You want to make greedy profit. You don’t want those other people making profit. Some piece-of-shit can commit a crime if he has enough money for a really good lawyer. If they could, they’d probably sell their grandfathers. They sell our future.

When Sharon Osborne, & others, smiled & laughed with a laughing audience while giving commentary about a woman who had his penis cut off for wanting a divorce, only one female paused it by morality. This is how women see male “weakness.”[13]

Women only see one thing of masculinity: Strength/usefulness. Because of that, women don’t even have a basic understanding of the realistic process of what it is to be male, even though they watch & read “life changing experiences by Hall-mark,” etc. – totally fake.

Women are “swine.”

Obvious definitions: Ignorance & stupidity are not the same. Women are stupid, & they create ignorance for men.

If you’re a traditionalist, you’re a feminist.




1: Sugar Crush by DR. Richard P. Jacoby, pg. 154

2: Ibid., 156-157

3: Ibid., 165, 167

4: Ibid., pg. 193

5: Ibid., pg 194

6: Self-entitled women are more likely to endorse benevolent sexism, study finds by Eric W. Dolan – psypost-dot-org

7: Norns – pantheon-dot-org

8: The Lesson of the Norns by Raven Kaldera – northernpaganism-dot-org

9: Polygamy In Africa – Polygamy-dot-com

10: Sorry ladies, African men are wired for polygamy by Nancy Roxanne – sde-dot-co-dot-ke

11: Ibid

12: More married women are cheating – here’s a glimpse into their ‘addictive’ secrets by Arti Patel – globalnews-dot-ca

13: Why does everyone find it funny when men almost lose their genitals by Dan Bell – telegraph-dot-co-dot-uk


female pleasure

When you are with a state of attraction, & I will use this word broadly to be practical, you are with a state of improvement. That’s the state of love – the masculine state. When you are with a state of fear/protection, that’s the female state. The state of handicaps. Women have had handicaps much more than males have historically, & they dragged that handicap to modernity. It is inappropriate.

Women are meant “by god” to be objects of stress relief & to be programmed as maids, etc.. This isn’t even specifically pertaining to procreation, although that can be an option also.

Stress causes hormonal battles that cause serious health issues like hypertension & more.[1]

Continued periods of it has us vulnerable to illness because the brain sends defense signals to the endocrine system, releasing hormones that depresses immunity.

This isn’t about women. This is about us – males – because we’re the true organizers of society.

Social support, yes, I used the word support for the context of masculinity, is not supposed to be a contract. It’s not healthy that way. People with social support have better resistance to illness.

As gynocentrism continued, we only developed completely different & new sets of stress responses. This takes a toll on masculinity with burn-out.

Stressful situations causes inflammation[2], which effects the immune system.

Coping strategies to stress are drinking & smoking, which only causes MORE stress, thanks to females owning the social. They might not specifically own the activity of that, but they do own the process of making males ill-informed – to be concerned with quick-fixes rather than long-term change. Alcohol can cause coronary heart disease with the aid of hypertension.[3] No wonder there’s aggression associated with alcohol.

High blood pressure results with small lesions of the artery walls. Cholesterol tends to get trapped in them.

So don’t think that just because females lack direct physical attack to you that they don’t have cruel mechanisms. Women will put “salt into a wound” when they see a guy showing realistic experiences. “Haha, let’s all slander him: look at this creepy loser.” “He doesn’t talk much, so creepy.”

There’s this false idea of some males being weaker/”beta” males. No. males have various REALISTIC experiences. It’s about stress. People in New York City have more likeliness to get cardiovascular disease. It’s due to the fast-paced metropolitan stress.[4] Replacing frequent-stress jobs for easier ones, yes, even low-income life, will drastically reduce stress levels.

Even though America is acclaimed to be more developed, our managers in America are some of the rudest, cruelest, most vindictive humans on the planet. If you limit the source of this – females, there will be a “domino effect.” Corporate culture of “just abuse the guy under you” comes from women. It is also why America has the most cardiovascular disease rate. It’s all due to stress.

It’s not slut-shaming. It’s hybristophilia shaming.

You’ll notice a common pattern of female sexuality being less mature & more likely to cause social disaster/politics, etc., because of her, not because of “sexually frustrated males”, & absent social shaming (not slut-shaming, but hybristiphilia shaming, etc.) with the encouraging of “acceptable” sexual behavior, females will have their more primitive interaction normalized.

The ultimate strategy is to take “no” back from females. They have used it as a weapon, & now we need to take it back. This is one of the last ways we can coerce them without using violence. Violence would give whores the moral victory, & it’s not an acceptable result.

Statistically, men account for 90% of work-death[5], yet little is heard about this. There was reports for a period that women’s work-related death increased by a few percent. There was outrage of the media. But then it was realized that rather than more women ceased due to work related conditions, job losses combined with safety & health legislation reduced the amount of working men that died at work. This skewed the percentages & made it seem that death rate for women increased. On no point did a considerable amount consider the high percentage of men that were dying.

Theta & delta brain-waves predominate for children[6]. Babies – delta. 2-6 year olds – theta. Theta is a state associated with imagination. Theta is also a state associated with hypnosis. What kind of message is being downloaded to them when we, with female liberation having women away from superfluous bonding, prepare them to play football instead of cuddle?

~70% of all divorces are initiated by women.[7]

The data is consistent with reports of women expressing more overt conflict & dissatisfaction. The male is reported to be more concerned with the wife’s dissatisfaction, yet content himself. There’s a little thing called PMS, which means that women are NOT equal to men. PMS generally gives more mood swings.[8] This tendency to give to females, whichever way, does little to address that the rapacious female void will repeat the cycle of her personality disorders. The solution is to have HER DEDICATED TO GIVE TO HIM.

Research has provided evidence that oxytocin is a natural “technology.” By the central administration of the neuropeptide to virgin female rats (sorry for the unethical science exploiting other animals.), results are of maternal behavior[9]. Improving social “cognition,” it also attenuates stress, etc..

Additionally, there is evidence amassed that it therapeutically targets & reduces negative addiction.

High rates of divorce are attributed to a lack of oxytocin. This is why males must NEVER compromise. Always get the prettiest female possible & try to control her with affection, not gifts, etc..

The amygdala is partly involved with the processing of experiences of fear.[10] Oxytococin was studied to evoke inhibition of certain amygdalar responses.[11]

Oxytocin can decrease fear due to its action on the nucleus accumbens, considering its strategic localization & specific input/output to key structures involved with fear learning (e.g. amygdala, hippocampus & the PFC.)[12]

There was an article by Christopher Badcock Ph.D.: ‘The Dark Side of Oxytocin.'[13] Did this writer ever stop to think that, by the use of the wrong people, anything can be bad, as money, medicine, etc.. There’s more good to it than bad. The study emphasized more of the post-socializing of male-female bonding. As males are the ones with better ideas for sexuality, it’s usually females who want to show others to validate & to make other females jealous, etc.. Women have a tendency of weeding out guys that they would describe as “empty,” “obvious,” “lacking depth,” etc., which is really just code-words for guys who dont’ have silly egos.

Oxytocin is obviously associated with self preservation, including associative groups, so telling “white lies” can be ethical during certain circumstances.

Extinction is often used by psychotherapy. A person will have to confront the phobia. However, confronting the trigger can be tedious.

Oxytocin reinforces extinction: As an alternative to the tedious method, the expectation of recurrent fear subsequently abates.[14]

However, clinical studies are still new (2014).

Humans, with a brain structure that supports it, are inherently social. The concepts of evolution gives that a major driving force for the increase of the brain, particularly neocortex, was the development of social group living & pair bonds. Further, Future increase of the brain/evolution will be to control past instincts of “dominance.”[15]

Men are more likely to expereince trauma because they are coerced to compete[16] – getting an arm cut off in a factory, etc.. Maybe a bad example, but you get the point. The closest that women will generally have to that is some type of interpersonal assault, yet that is not likely to happen as often because women are usually a protected leisure class.

You’ve had a bad day at the office & you get home late, tired. You bring the mental state of the scolding at the office. When you try to have sex, it’s harder to get an erection. The stress from the office is her fault because males have to do some variation of that first to impress her.

A variety of hormones are disrupted during stress response, which block pain during stress, also blocks the release of luteinizing hormone releasing hormone – LHRH. Then a decrease in LHRH causes a decrease in luteinizing hormone – LH. LH is a valid hormone for T. production. FSH, stimulating sperm formation, also declines. Cortisol makes the testes less responsie to LH.[17]. You become less appealing afterwards to females because what women mostly “understand” is body-language.

During all this time that this is happening, while you’re being compared many times, females get to parade themselves sexually for the chance of replacing you with another brute, etc.. You’re being robbed.

A man is easier to control when there is sexuality on her terms. He’s so concerned with being with females that he doesn’t realize the ultimate & forgets alternative strategies. The encouragement of female sexuality makes males think they are “free” to do as he wants, but they’re really not free.

The retardation to masculinity, & I don’t mean that of a meaning of IQ, is by the majority of females who want other males to be aggressive, etc. because that’s all females can remember of the archaic. This proves that female sexuality is immature. Males had to use that mentality because they realized: “ok, we’re going to have to go out there & find ways to do most of the “dirty jobs.”

Males generally have the right idea when dealing with sexuality, not females. Males just want their freedom, some sex, & then, with minimized stress, compartmentalize further plans.

With dopamine, growth hormone, & oxytocin, yes, you are generally more revitalized when affectionate.

Fear provokes release of stress hormones & inflammatory agents such as cytokines in the blood-stream.

Have you noticed a pattern yet? Male – amorous/impassioned (It doesn’t even have to be a person. Males are also passionate about other interests): dopamine, oxytocin, vasopressin, growth hormone. Female – fear/judgment/gossip maintenance: cortisol, norepinephrine, cytokines, histamine.

Females don’t have “souls” like males do: That’s why they maintain hoards: They’ll try to coerce something different – “that guy’s weird,” unless the current trends makes her like it a fake, fashionable way. They also make it seem that males passionate about his own thing to be “needing a life” because he’s doing his own thing.

If cytokines or other stress hormones are added in a plastic dish, they cause the cells to stop growing & may cause them to die. Chemistry of stress stunts growth & conservation of cells because it diverts energy to sustain protection processes. Stress is one of the first causes of illness.[18]

2 types of stress: distress & eustress. Distress is when we experience threats. That’s when adrenaline & cortisol cause us to change the state of growth to protection, saving our lives from such distant & archaic things as a lion. (The thug that she wanted to be entertained by) Becoming corrosive by chronic threats – everyday traffic & job you hate – is also distress.

Eustress is good stress – exercising, concentrating on a difficult chess game, writing this article, or even sharing romantic love.

The mind takes environmental information, & calibrates your blood biochemistry.

During passion, the brain involves lots of testosterone. Lots of dopamine is then added that motivates pursuits of more. Vasopressin & oxytocin gets added. This will make the man more obsessed & fixated. When you cancel fear, more of the cuddle chemical oxytocin gets added.

When insects, wild animals mate, it’s really not about love.

Lust-driven human mating requires more.

Though testosterone is mostly associated with males & estrogen with females, these hormones are both exhibited by both sexes. Males produce an average 1o times more Testosterone, but T. fuels sexual desire in both sexes.

There is quantity of estrogen when females are fertile, & males only produce an average smaller fraction of estrogen that females do. However, researchers[19] have studied that estrogen also does its role of male sexuality, as well as maturation of sperm.

Does the liberated female with lots of ego seem to be that fun to be with, with all of their petty little social media cliques? No. that’s why males are lacking dopamine & less motivated[20] by quality dopamine. They want to put blame to males by not admitting that they’re low quality.

Dopamine is synthesized deep in the brain’s ventral tegmental zone & released in the nucleus accumbens in the forebrain. These are crucial zones of the pleasure/reward circuit of our brains.[21] This circuit has a unhealthy dimension. Activated by many pleasures, women become addicted to shopping, high-calorie food, a seemingly restless desire to go to every place instead of being content with minimal stations, partying, & other compulsive behavior. It is the parallel of a boy who plays too many video games. Those females are losers who need to get a real life – a passionate male for her to follow.

Deep with the center of the brain, specific control centers engage growth & protection responding to pleasure or pain. Primary centers: nucleus accumbens, ventral tegmentum, & ventral pallidum. If males control their own emotions & make it not control them, they can also have real control of women.If we practice more control of our own minds, we can control females minds.

Female rats with electrodes (again, apology for unethical science) implanted in a brain area where dopamine is synthesized pressed a lever that stimulated their pleasure/reward inappropriately abandoned their newborn pups for favor of pressing the lever,[22] much like the liberated female has neglected the other males to try to get the unattainable & unrealistic, etc..

There are worse addictions than good ones. For example: I’m a book collector. Something of value is produced after they’re used. Female addictions are wasteful.

A study found many more brain regions involved with LONG-TERM romance than newly romantic partnerships, including zones that are linked to attachment & those that can modulate pain & anxiety. Greater calm/maturity/being reserved is offered with long-term partnerships.[23] This is why newly involved persons have lamer relationships. They go to do other things for excitement because they don’t know what they’re doing.

Of most species, males & females do not have what biologists call “pair bonding,”. Of 97% of mammals, a male has sex & goes to find another to produce more. This is a less mature deal, much like how females think that they can have “Mr. Traveler,” or whatever, & that he’ll be that interested. Those are asocial men who just happen to have a lot of social groups. You can be asocial & still have lots of people. This then produces the idea meme by females that reserved males “have issues.”

One of the 3% is prarie voles/hamster rodent.[24]

Males produce a lot more vasopressin than females. Vasoppressin is a commitment/territory enhancer. That’s why females say “take me to the club.” Males naturally have more commitment, & I will repeat it again, this makes them more romantic. That’s why her terms are lesser than. It’s why the male needs to do what he wants to do, instead of doing things that she wants to do. It’s why males will say: “Let’s just stay in instead.”[25] Vassopressin is also linked to aggression, which is a good thing because you need a little bit of that to survive. If females think, he’s “too nice,” (which usually doesn’t even have real meaning), well, they can easily change that by vassopressin induction. Don’t give it to males that don’t deserve it.

When Oxytocin is blocked, mother rats reject their pups. When oxytocin is blocked, famously monogamous female prarie voles do not bond with mates [26].

Being with a state of romantic love is literally not normal, which is a good thing. Why would you want to be normal? (Possibly why some people hate public displays of affection)[27]

This is literal anti-masculinity – stress, often done by women.

Although some believe that exercise is a vanity thing, shedding fat can increase T. Levels.[28] Fat cells convert testosterone & androstenedione (a precursor of T.) into estrogen (specifically, estradiol).

Men who have a lack of balance of estrogen to T. can experience symptoms similar to womens’ menopause.

People joke about males having stress & women call them “sad” to trivialize it, but, it’s your settings that are made lame because you chose to trivialize it.

As man evolved, engaging with behaviors encouraged by T., like mating, women encouraged behavior that kills T.

Symptoms of low T. are[29]: Little or no interest for sex, fatigue, insomnia, feelings of depression, little interest for anything, irritability, lots of moody actions, decreased bone density, which can cause osteoporosis, inability to concentrate, increased body fat. (Reads a lot like the traits of women.)

Myth: “Low T. only happens with men of 40s.” Fact: it can begin with men of the ages of 20s.

More & more men, over the past 2 decades (published: 2016) are reporting stress at work.

T. fights depression, melts fat, keeps the body & heart healthy.

Traditionalism is as (perhaps more) threatening than Feminism. Traditionalism gave women many things – a “playground.” The female ego, which feminism also promotes, was one of the concoctions to that “playground.” Is traditionlaism the man’s fault? Not entirely. Women selected it. Androcentrism is a better alternative.

I hate listening to women (unless it’s verbal eroticism, etc.). Most of it is pointless & tedious.

When dumb people hear a smart person, they just get angry & they don’t conceive of that person of being smarter, & this is why women have controlled social interaction by monopolizing the discourse.

Continuing to ask questions – the need to know – isn’t a mark of stupidity. It’s a mark of intelligence. Women hate men who do this by calling it “weakness.” I make articles that’s more for the brain. The culture is making presentations meant for the purpose of getting you to subdue thinking. I’m concerned with controlling conditioning.

Whenever we live in a grand, prosperous time, its moments is inevitably stained by the incessant drabness of women.

Most of the awesome & memorable things happen in the home & when you’re young. You can’t necessarily change all these other political things, but you can breastfeed your kid, you can not hit your kid, etc., & you can show all the unnecessary dramatic tendencies of a woman so that the truth can happen early.

Women are allowed to monopolize their moods over really petty things, calling it “feminine energy”, etc., but when a man tries to use anger to actually make serious points emphatic, it’s called “harassing,” etc.. There’s a difference between outbursts of petty things & being commanding over serious things. It’s no wonder we live in a culture of males yelling about critical things called “bitter,” etc..

The state of outbursts & mood-swings, often most noticeable just before menstruation, is most effectively reduced by giving orgasms.

When these mood-swings are not reduced properly by the latter, it can result with even more personality disorders of severe female rape-fantasies, continuing even more bad planning & clumsy dynamics.

Many women have rape fantasies as well (of many reasons) for the specific reason of not showing themselves with lost control, i.e., screaming, etc., more freely. To me that’s one of the best parts anyway – seeing her “mentally retarded” during sex. That is why when a woman is playing “hard to get”/she’s rigid, It’s already decided that I don’t even want her anymore. I want females who actually like enthusiastically showing their pleasure more freely rather than having me do extra “drilling for oil.” The correlation is that women with (severe) rape fantasies are even more selfish than the average women. She wants even more contracts without giving much back. (I’ve even heard of a story, of a wife becoming violent because she couldn’t be pleasured.)

My ideal partner would’ve been one I was with briefly who had very little ego & she carried her PMS very elegantly. She would’ve been an excellent match, but knowing how the system truly operates, I took control.

When my father’s wife concluded him as a “wuss,” when he was already an alpha-male, it was because she was in her little bubble of her personality disorders. He, being friendly, couldn’t reflect or emulate what she was. It’s why women will disclose their hive-mind & say: “I love an intense (translates to histrionic over stupid things) guy who has a pierced tongue,” or something like that. I don’t know if that’s trendy now, but it was when I associated with them much more.

In order for civilization to be saved, eliminating female delusional fantasies & making policies of allowing intelligent men to have 4-15(+) wives needs to happen, like Mormons.[30]

With the internet commentary that women put on pedestals is by “sensitive” guys or whatever, there isn’t real meaning to that. That is a feminine narrative. The only reason for me condoning androcentrism is to compartmentalize the female.

The internet definition of hypergamy if false[31]. It assumes by omission that hypergamy is “fixed.” It is not. It is a continuous female driven action. It is mostly practiced by females, based on unrealistic expectations, causing more stress.

Societal shaming for promiscuous  (non-androcentric/uncontrolled by vasopressin) did a good job of keeping hypergamy suppressed.

The expectations of women have become so excessive that the majority of men are now deemed unsuitable, & I’m not typing of loser males.

Many of the functions of the male have been replaced by the daddy-state & its agents.

The more women have been given, the more unreal their expectations are.

The increase of “white knight” behaviour of showing aggression to strangers for displeasing women those “white knights” barely even know the context of is directly due to these men not even realizing who the real problem is, or the man who will take a woman with children that isn’t even his.

Without androcentrism, sexuality is perverted.

Women  think of terms of facades. Even as seniors, they still have some degrees of immaturity. When you stop acting like a southern Italian, for a lack of a better description, she’ll be less interested. Although she might still be with you, she will give you less passion. Females can mature with things like institutionalized schooling, but other than that, they will always be immature.



1: How Stress Affects the Immune System by Andrew Goliszek Ph.D. – PsychologyToday-dot-com

2: Stress Affects the Immune System by Dr. Paul Koeck – 15minutes4me-dot-com

3: Stress, Ilness & the Immune System by Saul Mcleod – simplypsychology-dot-org

3: The Sugar Problem | Endocrinology, Public policy & Obesity – Thinking Ape – Youtube-dot-com

5: MGTOW| The Disposable Male – It Ends Here (unique book with no author’s name) 147-148

6: R. Laibow, “Medical Application of NeuroBioFeedback” in Textbook of NeuroBioFeedback, edited by J.R. Evans & A. Abarbanel

7: Women Initiate Divorce Much More Than Men, Here’s Why by Douglas Labier Ph.d. – psychologytoday-dot-com

8: PMS Overview – webmd-dot-com

9: Oxytocin Treatment for Amphetamine-Induced Social Impairments by Dean S. Carson – jneurosci-dot-org

10: The Size & Connectivity of the Amygdala Predicts Anxiety by Christopher Bergland – psychologytoday-dot-com

11: Oxytocin Facilitates the Extinction of Conditioned Fear in Humans by Monika Eckstein, Benjamin Becker, Dirk Scheele, Claudia Scholz, Katrin Preckel, Thomas E. Schlaepfer, Valery Grinevich, Keith M. Kendrick, Wolfgang Maier, Rene Hurlemann

12: Oxytocin differentially modulates pavlovian cue & context fear acquisition by Juliana Cavalli, Michaela Ruttorf, Mario Rosero Pahi, Francesca Zidda, Herta Flor, & Frauke Nees – ncbi-dot-gov

13: The Dark Side of Oxytocin by Christopher Badcock Ph.D. – psychologytoday-dot-com

14: Oxytocin helps to better overcome fear | Universitat Bonn – sciencedaily-dot-com

15: Oxytocin Facilitates Pavlovian Fear Learning in Males by Monika Eckstein, Dirk Scheele, Alexandra Patin, Katrin Preckel, Benjamin Becker, Annika Walter, Katharina Domschke, Valery Grinevich, Wolfgang Maier & René Hurlemann – nature-dot-com

16: Ibid

17: The Stress-Sex Connection by Andrew Goliszek Ph.D. – psychologytoday-dot-com

18: Lyle H. Miller & Alma Dell Smith, The Stress Solution, 12

19: Liza O’Donnell & others, ‘Estrogen & Spermatogenesis,’ Endocrine Reviews, vol22, no. 3, pgs. 289-318

20: David J Linden, The Compass of Pleasure: How Our Brains Make Fatty Foods, Orgasm, Exercise, Marijuana, Generosity, Vodka, Learning, & Gambling Feel So Good, 18

21: Linden, The Compass of Pleasure, pgs. 3-5,

22: Ibid 7-15

23: Andreas Bartels & Semir Zeki, ‘The Neural Basis of Romantic Love,’ Neuroreport, vol. 11, no. 17: 3829-34

24: Lowell L. Getz & C. Sue Carter, ‘Prarie-Vole Partnerships,’ American Scientist, vol 84, no 1: 56-62

25: John M. Stribley & Sue Carter, ‘Devolopmental Exposure To Vasopressin Receptor Distribution Associated with social Organization in Microtine Rodents,’ The Journal of Neuroscienc, vol. 14, no. 9.: pgs. 5381-92

26: Thomas Insel & Terrence J. Hulihan, ‘A Gender-Specific Mechanism for Pair Bonding: Oxytocin & Partner Preference Formation in Monogamous Voles.’ Behavioral Neuroscience, vol. 109, no. 4: 782-89

27: D. Marazziti & others, ‘Alteration of the Platelet Serotonin Transporter in Romantic Love,’ Psychological Medicine, vol. 29: 741-45

28: 5 ways to increase Low Testosterone – prostate-dot-net

29: How Stress is Linked to Low Testosterone in Men – turtlecreekmedicalcenter-dot-com

30: It’s Official: Mormon Founder Had Up to 40 Wives by Laurie Goodstein – nytimes-dot-com

31: maladaptive Hypergamy | CS mgtow – sheddingoftheego-dot-com

Scientific Evidence That Fem. Are Anti-male | Jessie Nagy


For the claim that fem. do LITERAL emasculation: This isn’t even pertaining to the way females complain about petty matters (although that adds to it.) This is relevant to the macro.

You go to be trained to become an officer, etc., to be an alpha-male. You’re T. levels are significantly reduced during the training. Even a report by University of Texas found this.[1]

Clinical studies regarding psychological stress on male fertility have reported reduced paternity & abnormal semen parameters.[2] Because of varying testosterone secretion, psychological stress effects spermatogenesis. The hypothalamic-pituitary-adrenal axis includes a categorical inhibiting reaction on the HPG – hypothalamic-pituitary gonadal axis (not to be confused with the former) & Leydig cells in the testis. The GnIH – gonadotropin-inhibitory hormone – is a recently ascertained hormone. (published: 2015) It has an inhibiting effect for the HPG axis, which results with reduced testosterone, which also induces modified blood-testis barrier & Sertoli cells, initiating restraining of spermatogensis. Gonadotoxins & oxidation also make Germ cells vulnerable.

Repeated stress is bad for the body. There’s additional risks for insomnia, weakened immunity, headaches, etc., etc..[3]

When females want you to be a “hero,” leader, or whatever, that is LITERALLY emasculation. The REAL kind, not the kind that trad-cons & anti-feminists talk about. Women love abused masculinity. With all the toil, the gynocentric lifestyles, the alcohol, & as others repeat the meme of “soy boys”, they don’t even realize that alcohol has a horrible effect on T.[4]

Blaming external factors for female “catty” actions is false.

It has been reported that women in the work setting have conflicts with other females more often than males.[5] This is due to female nature.

The cliche that women don’t have “machismo” is a pop. culture myth. Factually, if you can discern the fake compliments, etc., women have MORE machismo than men, & they HATE the different.

Psychological science has confirmed that there isn’t necessarily a major noticeable difference (other than males being more forgiving) between how male & female peers treat each other with the same, exact departments. However, females have been proven to have less well treatment for others of different associations.[6] (March 3 paper published by Current Biology)

This is aligned with anecdotes I’ve had of other female workers talking to me totally different when I did dish-washing, which is harder work, while the “cooler” guys collecting tips in the front of the business for moving plates, etc., were celebrated.

A major difference is how males form groups reduced of personally evasive ways, while females tend to lack this formation.

Although males can have battles, they also have a larger, loose group of “brothers.” This completely destroys the entire pop. culture idea of “alpha-males.” What does a small portion of males that females are desiring have to do with the masculine state? This small portion creates negative comparisons. Who are you to try to correct, when I’m already capable of managing life, that I’m supposed to be obligated to comparing myself to presidents, etc., just because women are greedy for the unattainable?

Not only do females have more “Machismo,” but feminism is completely false, additionally to the obvious reasons, because of the very fact that the notion of good female cooperation is deluded, as it has been refuted cross-culturally.

Females often reduce group size to interact with the minimal desired.[7] Decline of civilization can be attributed to this female tendency of controlling, yet others will claim: “it’s the politician’s fault,” “It’s the fault of 90’s cynical, alternative rock music,” etc.. No. It’s the fault of women with narrow tendencies who will legislate that other males “should” be obligated to drastically apply male cosmetics to be with that narrow model – social constructs, & you see this as those constructs frequently because it’s shared with media as “advice.” It’s “advice” because they’re promoting behaviour change. This is almost somewhat similar to the transvestite phenomena. That’s right, I typed it. Look: sex is one of the most powerful forces on the planet, so males are going to do the fake, destructive performances to try to get it.

[8]They have a fear based mentality that determines their own projection[9].

Of a historical context, males became warriors NOT because they “wanted to fight,” it was because it was the initial experiments to save & serve the community, especially women.

Now, with female liberation added to their lack of developed real civility, society has believed that girls are empathic creatures who value female friendship, etc., & that boys are beasts of competition unable to form significant, lasting bonds, etc.. Scientific psychologists have found, in fact, that males form revering groups while females compete with each other for popularity.[10] Society has ignored this reality of female nature because of the fact that it was too busy trying to perform for her projection.

An article published by the NYPost gave that detail-conscious people are more likely to plan more intricate[11] sexual activities (my category). Extroverts are more likely to desire group sex & to be validated for their performance (also my category, without the praise). Introverts are classified as desiring passion & intimacy (also my category).

Introversion does not mean “shy.” It’s just a different personality type. It’s only because of things like the internet comments of the “meaning” of “autism”, which isn’t even real, that gets used to almost anyone with serious commentary on the net that the “shy” factor would get misapplied by others who have no psychological authority.

Men were reported to be more likely to focus on a specific person. Like I typed before: males are more romantic.

Women were reported to like violent sex.

The article did not give the specific variables of introverted females & extroverted females. My assumption is that the female introverts probably just want a very inclusive relationship with a male having some degrees of being cruel, whether small or a lot.

Not only that, but the article completely, even though the theme of the article was: what your sexuality states about PERSONALITY, omitted what the personality is of womens’ sexual preferences. The answer is obvious.

Are you aware of the term: Runaway selection? It is a type of female selection of which some of the most extreme, extravagant features are wanted. For example: the now extinct Irish Elk was a species of deer with antlers that became so large due to the female selection for it that the males could not manage nutrient debt for them growing. They are now gone. Another example is the Babirusa – an Indonesian pig with tusks so large that they can kill it by growing into the skull. The females find the males with bigger tusks more desirable.[12]

Confidence the way females define it is a sign of poor intellect: What is classified as Dunning-Kruger Effect[13] – little interest of being calculating of surroundings & not checking analysis ( a scientific trait).

Those female projections offered by only a subset of males is due to a model based on a transient precedent of what was an “emergency exit,” which has helped females delay modern society, which can, interestingly, be studied with a duplicate model of which females “mature” to other males, although I do not believe in female maturity to be genuine.

Women make heroes of men who lack scientific mindsets, & basically make losers of those who do have it.

EQ is a poorly conceived invention to please women. It is a pattern that will not reward excellence.

Similar to Pavlov’s dog, social inventions are done to give increments to what females call confidence.

Only when men stop seeing other males as “the enemy” & society as a performance field will we have real domination over women. This doesn’t mean welfare. It means to have feminine competition out of the equation.



1: How Stress Impacts On Testosterone – buildupperchest-dot-com

2: Effects of psychological stress on male fertility by Vinod H. Nargund – nature-dot-com

3: How Stress Impacts On Testosterone Levels – buildupperchest-dot-com

4: Effect of Alcohol (Ethanol) Administration on Sex-Hormone Metabolism in Normal Men by Gary G. Gordan, M.D., Kurt Altman, M.D., A. Louis Southren, M.D., Emanuel Rubin, M.D., & Charles S Lieber, M.D.

5: The Real Reason Women Bully Each Other at Work (& Everywhere Else) | Anna MAthews – intellectualtakeout-dot-org

6: In academia, men more likely to cooperate with lower-ranked collegues | Harvard University – Sciencedaily-dot-com

7: Rank influences human sex differences in dyadic cooperation | Joyce F. Benenson – cell-dot-com

8: Reviews & Brief Notices, Warroirs & Worriers: The Survival of the Sexes. By Joyce F. Benenson; with, Henry Markovits. | Kristin Liv Rauch – uchicago-dot-edu

9: Psychologist Discusses Attaction To Violent Criminals | Good Morning Britain

10: Warriors & Worriers: The Survival of the Sexes | Joyce Benenson – researchgate-dot-net

11: What you sexual fantasies say about your personality by Jessica Rapana – nypost-dot-com

12: Fisherian Runaway, The case of the Babirusa by BARBAROSSA – sheddingoftheego-dot-com

13:Chapter five – The Dunning-Kruger Effect: On Being Ignorant Of One’s Own Ignorance by David Dunning – Sciencedirect-dot-com

More Intactivism | Jessie Nagy


Intactivist artist: Vincenzo Aiello is presenting the foreskin to protest male circumcision.

I usually hate these kinds of people because artists generally don’t believe to much things of meaning, & just want to look “cool” with their adopted effeminate psychology, but this is commendable.

His Project: “HUFO: The Missing Piece’ (“HUman FOreskin”) is for the awareness to cuttting & the negative consequences it has on a male’s sexuality & emotional life. Yes, you read correctly: a MAN’S emotional life.

He creates very realistic sculptures inspired by Leaonardo da Vinci’s ‘Vitruvian Man’

Readers, please notice the “infiltrating” techniques we can use similar to his: His sculptures are priced for $1,000 to start his intactivism campaign. (Fuck you, you stupid female artists, with your dumb “bleeding vagina’ esque pieces.)

Circumcision is so common that parents forget what kind of surgery it is.

If the fore skin is such an integral component, how did this happen?

MGM (male Genital Mutilation) has a history starting almost 10,000 years ago, but this is pertaining to an American time.

Circumcision is not actually a serious medical procedure; it’s a cultural one. Many themes contributed to the introduction & popularization of it. The themes often combined with each other to enhance circumcision’s appeal.

It used to be confined to tribal & religious groups before the mid-19th century. To combat the evils of masturbation physicians implemented the medicalization of it.

Sexuality, especially male, was seen as a threat to the social ways of the Victorian Era. (I wonder how much they would’ve realized how wrong they were if they knew that female sexuality has been confirmed to be much less moral) Genital surgery was common – carbolic acid, insertions of high-voltage electric probes.

Additional to immature education to sexuality, doctors had a health crisis – venereal diseases. Gonorrhea & syphilis were epidemic in urban populations. Having only an experimental understanding of germ theory, physicians guessed that the hardened skin on the cut penis was resistant to microbes that infused those infected. To “prove” this theory, physicians did population studies of cut vs. intact males & found that cut males had lower mortality, morbidity, & STD rates than intact males. What those researchers failed to realize was that they were studying the differences of J***** (taboo word) & gentile cultures, not the effects of the absence or presence of a foreskin. So rather than encouraging good education about sexuality, etc., they used the J***** class as a model for others to succumb to. Hey, here’s an idea: Did you ever consider that there are other men on this planet with their own ambitions who don’t care about your dry type of living? You think that you have a mark of success. So what? It’s astounding how much violation, including to themselves, some will do for validation.

America had a reform of MGM as a symbol of high class. It was welcomed in sexually ill-educated 19th century America.

Immigrants were seen as unclean. The foreskin became a physical symbol of low-class & neglect. Circumcision/MGM was seen as a status symbol to distinguish oneself from the “filth.” You understand the idiocy males will do to attain status symbols?

As public opinion started favoring this surgery, doctors seized opportunities to combine religion & scientific beliefs, & people believe whatever others with status symbols will give. During the institutionalization of MGM in the U.s., medical journals relied more on theology, “moral” opinions rather than science & real ethics, such as how to address self care.

Although this kind of nonsense was published in journals in pre-Civil Rights U.S., this rhetoric still existed as late as the 1990s – when many millennials were born.

Professional academics argue that it promotes “self-control.” That isn’t even real self-control. Academia is full of idiots like these, & women listen to them automatically just because they have power.

Less childbirths occurred in a hospital in 1900. By 1960 almost all childbirths did. Because of this, circumcision rates started to increase during 1970s & 1980s.

Ignorance of fine penile development combined with financial incentives, publication, & women being immediate gratification seekers – anti-intellectual – allowed this invasive surgery to be normalized.

The foreskin has been ignored with common myths as “the foreskin is a vestigial flap.” Many doctors wrongly diagnosed boys with phimosis. Phimosis of the adult is rare & treatable. Phimosis does not exist with children because the foreskin is supposed to be fused to the glans until later. Of other words: boys are supposed to have phimosis. Because of the ignorance of doctors, they continue to misdiagnose children with a contrived condition. They get money they don’t deserve by doing this procedure.

Arguments that circumcision damages good sexual physiology & sensation – androcentric ordination – have been ignored by the anti-pleasure ( or indifferent/pragmatic attitudes to pleasure) establishments. Why are women allowed to monopolize their sensations, but men are not seriously allowed to?

Dr. John R. Taylor classified the foreskin as primary erogenous tissue during 1996. The pediatric societies of Canada & Australia condemn MGM as a violation.

Many American physicians are completely ignorant of the foreskin’s erogenous properties & function of sexuality, yet they will flaunt their little, pretentious degrees. Most modern urologists (Early 2000s) were born during the age of mass MGM, living with cut peers, & studied textbooks that omitted the foreskin (literally). American professionals are some of the least qualified to deal with the foreskin.

MGM is a lucrative business. The hospital makes ~$1000.00. The cutter makes a ~ few $100.00. Then more is made by the sale of the tissue to cosmetic & research companies. There is a tissue harvesting industry. A lot of it is for making new products for female narcissism. It operates with 1-2 billion dollars a year. Would that system try to stop due to ethics? They want to avoid blame & continue making a profit.

Some estimates exceeds 100 deaths in America due to infections & complications.

American media has been pro-circumcision & a contributor to the misinformation about the foreskin & it’s removal. Americans are quite smart – sarcasm.

Newsweek lauded Abraham Ravish’s claim that the NON-EXISTENT carcinogenic properties of preputial secretions infect every part of the body it contacted with cancer, mainly prostate, penile, & cervical cancer. Absurd – you believe anything that one with enough authority claims.

2/3 of modern adolescents can’t even identify if they have a foreskin or not.

Women’s stake for the circumcision decision was increasingly promoted.

With the combination of generational ignorance, promotions are made trendy with time

Aaron Fink just magically made a new justification during 1986: Prevention of HIV. Fink erroneously claimed that intact sex is “more liable to induce bleeding” & increase infection for heterosexuals. He conceded no evidence, the public gave him opportunity for his dogma.

Let us not forget that it is essential to know who did such studies. Bertran Auvert, Robert C. Bailey, Stephen Moses, Ronald H. Gray had been promoting MGM for years & the funding is governmental – some of the same organizations who have are trying to avoid blame: NIAD, HHS, NIH, WHO.

The most erogenous parts are the ridged band, inner mucosa, frenulum – the circumcision scar.

Exact historical rates of MGM are not available because many hospitals did not specifically report on what they were indifferent to.

Compulsory objectification of boy bodies are of no concern to academics.

Could it be that costs of MGM is more to taxpayers, & more lucrative to hospitals & cutters, because of increasing medical costs?

An eye does not function properly without a lid.

The unique mucous membrane permanently lubricates the glans, improving smoother intercourse.

Various sexual sensations are facilitated by the foreskin during direct stimulation of the sensitive glans. Yes, you read correctly: SENSITIVE.

Anti-bacterial agents are secreted that helps clean & protect the glans as immunological defense when the foreskin is present.

80% of the penis’s nerve endings reside in the foreskin.

The “ridged band” (sometimes called “frenar band”) is a unique, sensitive structure that stimulates the female’s inner labia & G-spot.

There are thousands upon thousands of specialized erotogenic nerve endings of several types, which can have sensations of slight variations of stretching & pressure, subtle changes of temperature, alternations of texture. Yes, reminder: SENSITIVE.

There’s thousands of fine-touch receptors called Meisner’s corpuscles. (also found in fingertips.)

Sensation is also lost in the glans after cutting because the sheath & glans have a “symbiosis”

It is common that cut males take much longer because they can’t have as much sensations. Women are SUPPOSED to be attentive to male sensitivity. They’re supposed to help the pace of the sensitive male.

Now, this is how it gets even more hard to believe: MGM is a millenia-old blood ritual, originally as a sacrificial rite. It morphed from religious practice to medical practice.

Would your eyes be cleaner if the lids were removed? The eyes have secretions that it needs.

A cut penis is actually more likely to contact feces & urine during infancy without a sheath.

We also have the most frequent rate of sexual violence.

South Korea adopted MGM during the American trusteeship after WW2.

Dr. Preston established that there is undesirable psychology due to MGM.



Further reading:

The Council on Scientific Affairs of the American Medical Association issued a policy report in December 1999 that re-classified neonatal circumcision as a “non-therapeutic” procedure.

The Encyclopædia Britannica article from the 9th edition (1876) gives a Victorian report. It does not mention medical purposes.

Gairdner’s historic world famous landmark classic medical article (1949)

Preston’s historic influential medical article (1970)

Paige (1978) gives a history of circumcision in the US. provides us with a history of cirumcision in the US.

DeMeo (1989) states the geography of the Deserts of Northeat Africa distributing genital mutilations.

Montagu (1991) gives anthropolgy of origins of genital mutilation

Bigelow (1992) traces J****** developing circumcision

Voskuil (1994) suggests menstruation linked to origin of circumcision

Gollaher (1994) describes transformation of ritual to circumcision

Mclaren gives presentation of Dr. John Harvey Kellogg

Warren and Bigelow (1994) present sacrificial origin of circumcision

Frederick M. Hodges, Jerry W. Warner. The Right to Our Own Bodies: The History of Male Circumcision in the U.S. M.E.N. Magazine 1995 (November)

Moscucci reports results of research of introduction of circumcision to prevent masturbation in the late 19th century.

The Oxford Dictionary of the J***** Religion (1997) reviews history of J***** circumcision.

DeMeo (1996) regards origin of male and female circumcision.

Schultheiss (1998) provide history of man’s attempts to restore prepuce after unwanted circumcision.

Dunsmuir & Gordon (1999) give history of circumcision

Kim and colleagues provide a history of circumcision in South Korea

Brandes and McAninch review history of efforts to undo effects of circumcision.

Frederick Mansfield Hodges (1999) reports medical treatment of phimosis & paraphimosis in classical medical literature.

James E. Peron gives development of circumcision of J***** history from a minor procedure into a major mutilation, & how this injurious circumcision was accepted by medical practice.

Frederick Mansfield Hodges, D. Phil., has researched the Greek and Roman attitudes toward the prepuce.

John M. Ephron reports that German J*** used medical arguments to justify & promote the practice of male circumcision to Gentiles during the 19th and early 20th centuries.

John Evelyn observed a J***** circumcision at Rome in 1645 & recorded it in his diary.


Other Sources:


The History of Circumcision website.

Canadian Circumcision History

New Zealand Circumcision History

Anonymous. Clitoridectomy and Medical Ethics. Medical Times and Gazette (London) 1867:(1):391-2.

Encyclopædia Britannica, 9th Ed. s.v. “Circumcision,” by Rev. T. K. Cheyne.

Offord J. Restrictions concerning circumcision under the Romans. Proc R Soc Med 1913;6(Sect Hist Med):102-7. (PDF)

Pirie GR. The story of circumcision. Can Med Assoc J 1927;17(12):1540-2. (PDF)

Gairdner DA. The fate of the foreskin: a study of circumcision.. BMJ 1949;2:1433-1437.

Preston EN. Whither the foreskin? A consideration of routine neonatal circumcision. JAMA 1970;213:1853-1858.

Paige, Karen Eriksen. The ritual of circumcision. Human Nature, pp 40-48, May 1978.

James deMeo. The Geography of Genital Mutilations. The Truth Seeker, pp 9-13, July/August 1989. – noramm-dot-rg

Montagu, Ashley. Mutilated Humanity. Presented at the Second International Symposium on Circumcision. San Francisco, California. April 30-May 3, 1991. – nocirc-dot-org

Hall RG. Epispasm: circumcision in reverse. Bible Review 1992;August:52-7.

Bigelow J, Ph.D., The Development of Circumcision in Judaism. In: Bigelow J., The Joy of Uncircumcising! Hourglass Book Publishing, Aptos, California 95001, 1992, 1995. (ISBN 0-934061-22-X) (out of print)

Voskuil, D, Ph.D. From Genetic Cosmology to Genital Cosmetics: Origin Theories of the Righting Rites of Male Circumcision. Presented at the Third International Symposium on Circumcision. University of Maryland, College Park, Maryland, May 22-25, 1994. nocirc-dot-org

Gollaher, David L. From ritual to science: The medical transformation of circumcision in America. Journal of Social History Volume 28 Number 1, p. 5-36 (Fall 1994).

McLaren, Carrie. Porn Flakes: Kellogg, Graham and the Crusade for Moral Fiber.

Warren J, Bigelow J. The case against circumcision. British Journal of Sexual Medicine, September/October 1994:6-8.

John J. Tierney. Circumcision. In: The Catholic Encyclopedia, 1913, 1997.

Frederick M. Hodges, Jerry W. Warner. The Right to Our Own Bodies: The History of Male Circumcision in the U.S. M.E.N. Magazine 1995 (November)

Moscucci, Ornella. Clitordectomy, Circumcision, and the Politics of Sexual Pleasure in Mid-Victorian Britain. Sexualities in Victorian Britain. Indiana University Press, Bloomington, Indianapolis, 1996.

Taylor JR, Lockwood AP, Taylor AJ. The prepuce: specialized mucosa of the penis & its loss to circumcision. Br J Urol 1996;77:291-295.

Circumcision. In: The Oxford Dictionary of the Jewish Religion, Oxford University Press, New York & Oxford 1997.

DeMeo, James. The Geography of Genital Mutilations. (Presented at the Fourth Symposium on Sexual Mutilations, University of Lausanne, Lausanne, Switzerland. August 9-11, 1996.) Published in: Sexual Mutilations, A Human Tragedy, Plenum Press, New York, 1997 (ISBN 0-306-45589-7). – nocirc-dot-org

Hodges FM. A short history of the institutionalization of involuntary sexual mutilations in the United States. in: Denniston GC, Milos MF (eds.), Sexual Mutilations: A Human Tragedy (New York: Plenum Publishing, 1997), pp. 17-40. (ISBN 0-306-45589-7)

Oh W, Merenstein G. Fourth Edition of the Guidelines for Perinatal Care: Summary of Changes. Pediatrics 1997;100(6)1021-1027.

Goldman Ronald, Ph.D., Origins and Background. In: Questioning Circumcision: A Jewish Perspective. Vanguard Publications, Boston, 1998. (ISBN 0-9644895-6-2)

Schultheiss D, Truss MC, Stief CG, Jonas U. Uncircumcision: a historical review of preputial restoration. Plast Reconstructive Surg 1998;101(7): 1990-1998.

Dunsmuir WD, Gordon EM. The history of circumcision. BJU Int 1999; 83, Suppl. 1: 1-12.

Kim DS, Lee JY, Pang MG. Male circumcision: a Korean perspective. BJU Int 1999; 83 Suppl. 1:28-33.

Brandes SB, McAninch. Surgical methods of restoring the prepuce: a critical review. BJU Int 1999; 83 Suppl. 1:109-113.
Hodges FM. The history of phimosis from antiquity to the present. in: Denniston GC, Hodges MF, Milos MF (eds.), Male and Female Circumcision: Medical, Legal, and Ethical Considerations in Pediatric Practice (New York/London: Kluwer Academic/Plenum Publishing, 1999), pp. 37-62.

Hodges FM. Phimosis in antiquity. World Journal of Urology 1999; 17(3):133-136.
Peron, James E. Circumcision: Then and Now. Many Blessings 2000;III:41-42.

Gollaher, David A., Circumcision: A History of the World’s Most Controversial Surgery. New York: Basic Books, 2000. 253 pages. (ISBN: 0-465-04397-6)
Council on Scientific Affairs, American Medical Association. Report 10: Neonatal circumcision. July 6, 2000.

Hodges FM. The Ideal Prepuce in Ancient Greece and Rome: Male Genital Aesthetics & Their Relation to Lipodermos, Circumcision, Foreskin Restoration, & the Kynodesme. Bull Hist Med 2001 Fall;75(3):375-405.

John M. Ephron. Medicine and the German Jews. New Haven: Yale University Press, 2001: 222-233. (ISBN 0-300-08377-7)

John Evelyn. Diary, January 15, 1645. In: The Times, London, 15 January 2003.

Robert Darby. `Where doctors differ:’ The debate on circumcision as a protection against syphilis, 1855-1914. Social History of Medicine 2003;16(1):57-78.

Robert Darby. The masturbation taboo and the rise of routine male circumcision: a review of the historiography. J Soc Hist 2003;36:737-57.

Robert J L Darby. Medical history and medical practice: persistent myths about the foreskin. Med J Aust 2003; 178(4):178-9.

Bollinger D. (2003) Intact Versus Circumcised: Normal versus Circumcised: U.S. Neonatal Male Genital Ratio. Circumcision Reference Library (an original online publication), 22 April 2003.

Darby R. The riddle of the sands: circumcision, history, and myth. N Z Med J 2005;118(1218):U1564.

Androutsos G. The truth about Louis XVI’s marital difficulties. Prog Urol 2002;12:132-7. (Translated from the French by Dennis Harrison.)

Artist Launches Anti-Circumcision Kickstarter with Hyperrealistic Forekin Sculptures | Sarh Cascone – artnet-dot-com

The Value of Circumcision as a Hygienic and Therapeutic Measure. . Montefiore, Moses J. 1871, New York Medical Journal, pp. 368-374.

Kellogg, John Harvey. Treatment for self-abuse and its effects. 1888.

Nervous Diseases Connected with Male Genital Function. Beard, G. M. 1882, Medical Record (New York), pp. 617-621.

Scull, Andrew and Favrean, Diane. ‘A Chance to Cut Is a Chance to Cure’: Sexual Surgery for Psychosis in Three Nineteeth Century Societies. 1986.

Money, A. Treatment of Disease in Children. Philadelphia : s.n., 1887.

Remondino, Peter Charles. History of Circumcision. 1891.

Vital Statistics of the Jews. Billings, J. S. 1891, North American Review, pp. 70-84.

Universal Circumcision as a Sanitary Measure. Wolbarst, Abraham L. 1914, Journal of the American Medical Association, pp. 92-97.

Gollaher, David L. Circumcision: A History of the World’s Most Controversial Surgery. New York, NY : Basic Books, 2001.

Bushman, R.L. and Bushman, C.L. The Early History of Cleanliness in America. 1988.

A Practical Suggestion in Regard to the Technique of the Operation of Circumcision. Brown, J. Y. 1890, Medical Mirror (St. Louis).

Tonsillectomy and Circumcision: Comparisons of Two Cohorts. Calnan, M., Douglas, J. W. and Goldstein, H. 1978, International Journal of Epidemiology, pp. 78-85.

Circumcision. Williams, A. U. 1889, Medical Standard (Chicago).

A Plea for Circumcision. Lehman, Mark J. 1893, Medical Review, pp. 64-65.

Prophylaxis of Cancer of the Prostate, Penis, and Cervix by Circumcision. Ravich, Abraham L. and Ravich, R.A. 1951, New York State Journal of Medicine, pp. 519-520.

Ravich, Abraham L. Preventing V.D. and cancer by circumcision. New York : Philosophical Library, 1973.

A Perspective on Controversies over Neonatal Circumcision. Weiss, Gerald N. 1994, Clinical Pediatrics, pp. 726-30.

Prophylactic Neonatal Surgery and Infectious Diseases. Weiss, Gerald N. 1997, Pediatric Infectious Disease Journal, pp. 727-34.

Wertz, Richard E. and Wertz, Dorothy C. Lying-In: A History of Childbirth in America. New Haven : Yale University Press, 1989.

Immediate circumcision of the newborn male. Miller, R L. and Snyder, D. C. 1953, American Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology, pp. 1-11.

Some practical aspects of circumcision. Gerber, M. L. 1944, US Naval Med Bull, pp. 1147-9.

Philo. The Special Laws (Translated to English 1937). ~25 AD.

Maimonides, Moses. The Guide of the Perplexed. 1190.

On the Advantages of Circumcision. Hutchinson, Jonathan. 1900, Medical News, pp. 707-08.

The prepuce: Specialized mucosa of the penis and its loss to circumcision. Taylor, J. R., Lockwood, A. P. and Taylor, A. J. 1996, British Journal of Urology, pp. 291-95.

Australian College of Paediatrics. Position Statement: Routine Circumcision of Normal Male Infants and Boys. Parkville, Victoria : s.n., 1996.

Canadian Paediatric Society; Fetus and Newborn Committee. Neonatal circumcision revisited. 1996.

Smith’s Urology. New York : McGraw-Hill, 1963, 1975, 1981, 1992, 1995, 2004.

Campbell-Walsh Urology. Philadelphia : Elsevier, 1954, 1963, 1970, 1978, 1986, 1992, 1998, 2002, 2007.

Fletcher, CR. Circumcision in America in 1998: attitudes, beliefs, and charges of American physicians. 1998.

A cost-utility analysis of neonatal circumcision. Van Howe, R.S. 2004, Medical Decision Making, pp. 584-601.

Circumcision Cost. CostHelper. [Online] 2012. health-dot-costhelper-dot-com

Pitta, J. Biosynthetics. Forbes. May 10, 1993, pp. 170-1.

Infant Circumcision: The debate over parents’ rights, human rights and the right to choose. Fauntleroy, G. 2001, The New Mexican.

Lost Boys: An Estimate of U.S. Circumcision-Related Infant Deaths. Bollinger, Dan. 2010, THYMOS: Journal of Boyhood Studies, pp. 78-90.

The Relationship of Circumcision to Cancer of the Prostrate. Ravich, Abraham L. 1942, Journal of Urology, pp. 298-99.

Newsweek. June 28, 1943, p. 110.

A Study of Environmental Factors in Carcinoma of the Cervix. Wydner, Ernst. 1954, American Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology, pp. 1016-52.

Circumcision and Cancer. TIME. April 5, 1954, pp. 96-98.

Statistical Considerations on Circumcision and Cervical Cancer. Wydner, Ernst. 1960, American Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology, pp. 1026-30.

Self-assessment of circumcision status by adolescents. Risser, J. M., et al. 2004, American Journal of Epidemiology, pp. 1095-97.

Is hygiene enough? Circumcision as a possible strategy to prevent neonatal group B streptococcal disease. Fink, Aaron J. 1988, American Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology, pp. 534-5.

Circumcision and Sand. Fink, Aaron J. 1991, Royal Society of Medicine, p. 696.

A Possible Explanation for Heterosexual Male Infection with AIDS. Fink, Aaron J. 1986, New England Journal of Medicine, p. 1167.

Glick, Leonard. Marked In Your Flesh. New York : Oxford University Press, 2005. p. 207.

Do the benefits of male circumcision outweigh the risks? A critique of the proposed CDC guidelines. Earp, Brian. 2015, Frontiers in Pediatrics.

Randomized, controlled intervention trial of male circumcision for reduction of HIV infection risk: the ANRS 1265 Trial. Auvert, B., et al. 2005, PLoS Med.

Male circumcision for HIV prevention in young men in Kisumu, Kenya: a randomised controlled trial. Bailey, R.C., et al. 2007, Lancet, pp. 643-56.

Male circumcision for HIV prevention in men in Rakai, Uganda: a randomised trial. Gray, R. H., et al. 2007, Lancet, pp. 657-66.

Circumcision and HIV infection: review of the literature and meta-analysis. Van Howe, R. S. 1999, International Journal of STD C& AIDS, pp. 8-16.

Circumcision for HIV Prevention: Failure to Fully Account for Behavioral Risk Compensation. Kalichman, Seth, Eaton, Lisa and Pinkerton, Steven. 2007, PLoS Medicine.

Long-term population effect of male circumcision in generalized HIV epidemics in sub-Saharan Africa. Garenne, Michel. 2008, African Journal of AIDS Research, pp. 1-8.

Male circumcision and its relationship to HIV infection in South Africa: Results of a national survey in 2002. Connolly, Catherine, et al. 2008, South African Journal of Medicine.

Firger, Jessica. Circumcision rates declining in U.S., study says. CBS News. [Online] April 2, 2014. – cbsnews-dot-com

Carroll, Linda. Circumcision Rate Falls Despite Health Risks. NBC News. [Online] April 2, 2014. nbnews-dot-com

Sifferlin, Alexandra. If Circumcision Rates Keep Falling, Health Costs and Infections WIll Spike. TIME. healthland-dot-time-dot-com

Study: As circumcision rates drop, costs increase. FOX NEWS. [Online] August 21, 2012. foxnews-dot-com

Fine-touch pressure thresholds in the adult penis. Sorrells, Morris L., et al. 2007, BJU International, pp. 864-869.

P. Fleiss and F. Hodges, What Your Doctor May Not Tell You About Circumcision

Sorrells, et al, Fine-touch pressure thresholds in the adult penis, British Journal of Urology International, Volume 99: Pages 864-869, (April 2007). – nocirc-dot-org

Geiger, Abraham. Nachgelassene Schriften (Unpublished Writings). Berlin : s.n., 1878.

Kellogg, John Harvey. Treatment for self-abuse and its effects. 1888.

Letter regarding peri-natal hospital stays and the performance of circumcision. Van Howe, R. 1996, Journal of Family Practice, p. 431.

Comparison of Ring Block, Dorsal Penile Nerve Block, and Topical Anesthesia for Neonatal Circumcision. Lander, Janice, et al. 1997, Journal of the American Medical Association, pp. 2157-2162.

The effects of circumcision on serum cortisol and behavior. R., Gunnar M., et al. 1981, Psychoneuroendocrinology, pp. 269-275.

Neonatal circumcision reconsidered. Rhinehart, J. 1999, Transactional Analysis, pp. 215-21.

Genital pain vs. genital pleasure: why the one and not the other? Prescott, J. W. 1989, Truth Seeker, pp. 14-21.

Huff, Ethan A. Extreme trauma from male circumcision causes damage to areas of brain. Natural News. [Online] March 8, 2015. naturalnews-dot-com

Can adverse neonatal experiences alter brain development and subsequent behavior? Anand, K. J. and Scalzo, F. M. 2000, Biology of the Neonate, pp. 69-82.

Falling Incidence of Penis Cancer in an Uncircumcised Population-Denmark, 1943-1990. Frisch, M., Friis, S. and Kjaer, S. K. 1995, British Medical Journal, p. 1471.

Smith’s Urology. New York : McGraw-Hill, 1963, 1975, 1981, 1992, 1995, 2004.

Cultural Bias in the AAP’s 2012 Technical Report and Policy Statement on Male Circumcision. Pediatrics. [Online] March 8, 2015. pediatrics-dot-aappublications-dot-org


Normalization Of Personality Disorders | Jessie Nagy


Sometimes, a woman will encounter you with alright signals, until it gets overtly sexual. She suddenly becomes indignant & balks to your attempts. She tricks you. This can be called the “rapo game”. Showing “weakness,” apologizing, supplicating may cause her to attack further.[1]

The game for them is the attainment of attention, but of a very sick way. It includes teasing. These women especially know that society will conform to them, & they are addicted to society conforming to her.

One of the most common things spoken of or implied by females is: “A girl will like it when a male is mean to others but nice to only her.”

Whether women realize this or not, this is basically how they operate.

Trends of being slovenly for females is an epidemic – the normalization of “plus-size”/body “positivity”, masculine women.[2] Disgusting. How stupid do you have to be to think that should be acceptable & that it’s “healthy” & “good”?

Women have been very apt to normalize personality disorders. If you need any further proof, just be alert to how other males make themselves compare themselves to the subdivision of males that females want. It is just like the case of women trying to normalize disgusting, slovenly, fat or masculine women. Those men have personality disorders like women.

Research has given that unborn children need more than just nutrition. The infant & fetal nervous system has a sophisticated nervous system, which has sensory & learning capabilities.[3]

Not just genetics, but also other influences. Maternal blood contains much “information.” The consequence is that the developing fetus, bathed in the same blood chemistry as the mother, experiences similar experiences to her[4].

If the mother is wildly with a state of love, the fetus absorbs that[5].

With the daddy-state taking fathers away from giving passionate love to the woman, etc., thanks to the enforced commerce, the fetus is bathed in chemicals of rejection, anger, etc., & the daddy-state’s enforcement of over-commerce is due to the females’ normalization of personality disorders.

It is not a sustainable way.



1: Practical Female Psychology for the Practical Man | Joeseph W. South, David Clare, Franco

2: Plus-size clothing & overweight models are normalizing obesity, warn experts | Sarah Knapton – telegraph-dot-co-uk

3: David Chamberlain, The Mind of Your Newborn Baby, xiii

4: Thomas R. Verny, M.D., & Pamela Weintraub, Tomorrow’s Baby: The Art & Science of Parenting from Conception through Infancy, 29

5: Annie Murphey Paul, Fetal Origins: How The First Nine Months Shape the Rest of Your Life, Time (Sept. 22, 2010)