The reason I don’t care about women’s side of the story is that women have been the ones basically apathetic & even laughing to male experience & trial & error, yet all of a sudden, when memetics is gaining some amount of a.d.d. induced popularity, you have whores who magically concern themselves on some diluted level.
With the question often by the political of whether we’ve become Machiavellian with the materialism & carelessness/nihilism of the dominant culture, similarly, my question is from the psychological point: Has the society become feminine? The answer is yes.
The fact that the casual is ignorant & uncaring about these enormous feminine tendencies is proof they’re ordained by the feminine.
The amorality that is required to be glamorized is portrayed as developed by “tough-minded” people.
When you could ask “sally to get a shake,” there was a little bit more option for the male to actually discern what he was investing his time with.
The excess now given to female-centrism of speed-dating culture makes them bored, agitated, etc., when they see the slightest little thing. Women’s ideals of courtship are false, & their inconsistency is increasingly being disclosed.
We don’t really have the experience of friendship. Girl-friend & boy-friend is false terminology because women view men the way as consumerism products: “So I met this super-popular guy on a dating site that I was using to advertise my cam-whore profile. He told me that his ex-girlfriend dumped him. I’m not getting another’s “trash,” so I blocked him on Twatter.”
Patience is gone. Development is gone. Building a “visualization” for the male to have it become real is devalued.
The generations of texting retards has it that if someone makes one little mistake, it’s next swipe. That’s the way female psychology is. Masculine technology has given us evidence of female psychology that is the most blatant.
As female greed is starting to show their delusions & agitation, angry women make men have torpor. Male torpor makes women angry. You know what you get in return, as a male, for your efforts? Practically nothing.
There’s nothing wrong with you as a male for being calculating. They’re basically eliminating masculinity.
Of course, believing that Feminism is wrong, one of the things that I’ve gained is that I can understand the world by the objective/masculine point, women have the other view, & when I say view, I really do define it by seeing & judging by limiting surfaces, such as when a baby sees a dark shadow, or something like that, it gets scared, but when you get older, you realize that it’s silly to get scared about things like that, yet female psychology is not that much different from that, & now with what was typed with the previous paragraph, it’s extremely obvious of how they interpret reality with total inconsistency & subjectivity.
People don’t comprehend & I’ve been taken out of context, so I need to reiterate:
Now “Mama Gyps Tatwa,” or some rediculous nick-name, has 10 kids with 5 mystery fathers. While she’s looking for another partner-in-crime to help her “indie” business of selling marijuana, while collecting welfare, Goldie-locks is looking for “Mr. Unreal” – owns three fancy buffets, walks with a peg-leg, like a pirate, has a scar on his left eye-area, & also owns a dungeon.
Since they will not give you serious answers, & good communication is seen as “weakness,” etc., to women, ordaining you to postmodernism, this is the answer of what they want: “I love a man who’s been hardened by a hard life” – abused masculinity: that’s what women are attracted to, or the other one is: “I love a man that can entertain me.” – not firm or independent.
If women had also never incentivized so much novelty, northern/western society, which featured much more chivalry, which turns into female greed, they could’ve concentrated their own throughout history to the mass that abundance of eastern societies have.
Getting sex isn’t a serious mark of being true.
It’s going to take a lot of excessive effort because it’s against the level of savage thinking & ad hominems.
They’re the ones consuming escapism. Cognitive dissonance/delusion (such as asking for citations, which there are many on end) is a major factor of various personality disorders. It’s obvious of the casual nature of some who would defend various histrionic personality disorders just because of excitement or a desire for social bonding. The inability to even realize the obviousness of the cruelty of that thought process by denouncing another as “normal”/boring, etc. (possibly useful), just proves how feminine you are, even if you are a man. Real men have extreme,dogmatic, fanatical, fundamentalist morals.
Viruses are spread by contamination. Gynocentrism is a mental disease, especially becoming an “alpha” male, which puts one in a state of perpetual naivety.
Purist male Buddhist priests – hard-line moralists, preaching mindfulness/subdued instincts, no emphasis on fashionable popularity contests for the male, compassion – have realized that women, who are deeply sinful, cannot, unless they are reborn as male, attain Buddhahood, which is the realization that much of prior sensory experience is similar to hogs rolling in dung.
Being amoral, dramatic, etc. – all easy. Being moral – that’s the hard thing.
With identity & name removed so that I don’t have to deal with whores claiming I do “internet bullying”, etc., look at that disgusting title-picture, which is actually bullying, of proof of female psychology I found. It was from a Lesbian pick-up-artist group that I have spied on.
I know, there’s immature women out there, but the “sophisticated” women are just doing a different rendition.
The key to experiments is it needs to be repeated: If you’ve experienced female behavioral universals multiple times, you can discern there are patterns: Scientific controls work that way as well: With female collectivism – most women are extremely similar, which is why you don’t need pretentious degrees to make axioms about their actions, you have “diplomatic” women with lesbians.
Females have the idea that in order for something to be good, it “needs” to be identical. The mature realization is that you can have quality, but quality because the differences compliment each other. Female collectivism doesn’t work. It’s a tried & primitive thing. Women can’t even maintain that ideal of identical society anyway. That mentality leads to social incompetence, as they can’t take reality, they go to gossip about all the differences of others when those others are not there.
I remember my last girlfriend had her collective hating me because I was truely different – not different “trademark harcuts,” but REAL difference. They all didn’t like that she was betraying the feminine collective.
With the effeminate “Mtv.” generation, they have ownership of really stupid routines.I guarantee you, that the guy she abuses like that probably got anxiety from experimenting with marijuana. While people think it’s a great drug, marijuana increasingly makes it difficult for one to be capable of dealing with even basic situations.
According to a study of the open access journal PLOS ONE by Shashwatch Meda, college students who consume medium-to-high levels of marijuana & alcohol have a consistently lower GPA, but, hey, you know, it’s alright when you’re given courses that aren’t even a real sign of intelligence, like art-school. (Sarcasm.) If you haven’t noticed, I absolutely despise MOST art-students.
As the artistic influences are introducing marijuana, claiming ownership of lamer forms of entertainment anyway, which makes them not even smart enough to know how to experiment, it actually is associated with an increase of physical violence in relationships & general problems among young people, according to a study published in Drug and Alcohol Dependence. Studies resulted with associations strongest by females.
If I were that guy, I would’ve schooled that whore & had her running to another guy to try to beat me, to which I would traumatize intellectually. I don’t need to physically attack anyone, I can scold them & have them “crying to mommy.” I’m not necessarily defending that guy who is a part of stupidity, but knowing the wrong communication & tactics of women, he’s probably been subdued by some kind of feminine forces.
There’s even a reversed meme that realistically “calling out”, as they would say, constitutes as being p.c.. But p.c. is actually when you don’t judge realistically.
Male enemies of women can still be desired because of women’s instinct to try to hoard as much power as possible with almost all costs.
I’ve been slandered so many times: From “low-status degenerate who takes the pogo-stick to welfare,” to “liar,” & much more. I remember this fucking bitch slandered me as “trashy,” without even knowing me, because I was gaining some amount of focus from others, while she was with a sleazy drug-dealer. It’s because of that perennial comparison that women do with the female herd, as they get together to gossip, etc.. Last whore I was with ended it abruptly because her female associates, without even knowing me, claimed that I was “creepy.” They say that conspiracies are just “paranoid theories by losers,” but conspiring is just a trait of mammalian societies, from micro to macro. What they do isn’t bullying of the way it is commonly thought, but they do get together & use some kind of force against others.
I remember when I started meditating. It’s just a technique – a mental exercise. When I became a lot more mellow when doing this, I noticed all the women around me got so agitated by me really easily.
There is that general pattern happening when a self respecting male can’t take something stupid seriously to be slandered by women as a “loser.”
Simplicity & exaggeration of sentiments of crowds result with women’s extremes. A suspicion transforms itself as soon as announced into incontrovertible evidence.
They don’t realize that alphas get ruined also. What’s even the point of distinguishing male levels? The divorce industry indicates an analysis of men who were, by definition, successful. Why is there a 75% divorce rate by women? Personality disorders & delusions is just in a woman’s nature.
Men generally have a basic instinct to defend women. I don’t really have that because I’m in total control of my biology. I have absolutely no hypocritical tendencies because I abide by being hard-line. The reason that is is that men have the capability of being moral, which women lack.
To maintain such contradictions in one’s mind, most common of the feminine, is pathological. It is a pathological response of a crowd.
The feminine champions women’s rights & gay rights, but ignores the mistreatment of women & gays of policies of the exotic for some fake gesture. They glorify negative complications for good-person badges, yet they oppose different, complex thoughts.
There’s a theory that angry foreigners are so because they “can’t get laid.” The fanatics of those other cultures have very, very strict rules of sex: celibacy, as well as total ownership of women. I think the anger is due to completely different politics.
Androcentrism is not “reversed sex roles.” It’s reversed worship, for a lack of a better description.
Choosing gynocentrism over heterosexual androcentrism makes you reject order & the moral terms over her.
Allowing females to exercise their collectivism weakens masculinity, as they are greedy for novelty, etc., they will get together for perennial comparisons & political gossip. By disrupting the social collective of femininity, real power is given to males. The first target is popular entertainment.
The so called home-maker evolves to homewrecker for scheming to upgrade incessantly.
Get rid of the old system & rebuild something new. We know right & wrong for the most part. Morality is subjected to the passions though, & that’s why you need education. Androcentrism is the juncture of both order & passions.
The “mother’s intuition” – a silly statement. What it translates to is that “truth” is the opinion of the popular. There are many fronts for appetite with fake order.
A study published in Human Ethology Bulletin found that men concluded sexual flirtations by women as the most effective. Women thought flirtations that represented commitment & exclusivity as most effective. Men already have their minds made of the beginning that women create major traps, hence why they prefer non-committed flirting. So much for the idea of female intuition having “more wisdom” with their level of baby reading.
The Journal of Sex Research gathered that it is common for young women to persuade their partners to have sex without a condom. Sarcasm: Yeah, really good intuition. They used, obviously, seduction & risk reassurance.
Women have a tendency to gather information about a male to report & gossip back with their female consensus, while convincing males that he is “significant” to her.
Males have much more wisdom & better facts than females.
The one who gave theory of relativity also was “infected” by politics, as he was associated with political factions,the Atom Bomb was created.
Politics is not science. Politics should have no business in science. Politics is feminine. It’s done numerously by males, but mostly for showing themselves as “alpha” males. That’s right; I typed it.
The men who didn’t care about the game aren’t even safe from the “scorched earth” tendencies of women. To get to the ranks of the small percentage of masculinity that women see, you have to basically lose some levels of sanity.
There isn’t a balance. Women are often complaining about “dating down” & don’t even realize what’s happening. This is how it happens: As the ranks of the greedy gets increasingly smaller & smaller, women become even more unrealistic. Women’s further liberation, especially with pretentious degrees inflating their egos, has made them have smaller chance of getting a man who cares about her delusional ego as much as she does. Of other words. If you put a woman in a position of a president of a company, she’s not going to seriously get a man because she’s now looking for something with less probability. As more & more women are liberated, the value of masculinity is cheapened. Yes, that means: when you allow a woman to be directer of fashion-blogging, or something, she’s going to think that the automobile dealer is “nothing.”
Further, by the time males get to the increasingly narrowing top, as they lose more sanity, they’re not likely going to want to dedicate it to one. All that hard work, they’ll want to enjoy their fruits.
I actually got saved. If I would’ve gotten married, etc., although not necessarily the exact same thing, I would’ve been relegated to the similar situation I noticed my father did: he was an alpha male who was the leader of the operation. His wife got annoyed by him, called him a “wuss,” then got a large some of his assets in the divorce industry, which is enhanced by the feminine. Now, I have a new thing I have to save myself from, & it’s YOUR JOB to help other males from the very real traps of women:
You’re punishment from women for not even caring about the game & just wanting to be a waiter at a food-place will eventually be replaced by a similar process of a new invention used by greedy corporations of an automated type of waiter because the narrowed top enhanced by femininity turns you into a psychopath, or docile idiot. How can you not understand that women are the enemy?
It’s a mental illness due to the feminine because jealousy/popularity is intrinsic of the feminine: to be a partner in crime with another is her fantasy. Women are actually MORE competitive than men are, but their competition is not set by the mental intricacies. It’s like a football player pushing away all the others coming near. But the “pushing” by whores is it’s all those other men she’s with to have as a means to an end. What’s the end? Well there is no real end to a woman because that would require some amount of moralistic thought/consistency.
Thanks, women, for exercising your belief in some unrealistic masculinity, which has caused society to miss the men who are already perfectly healthy, & has caused dysfunction posed as “discipline.”
It’s largely a money racket.
A vast majority are actually too stupid to even be indoctrinated, so what’s the next level?
The education system indoctrinates youth for relative nonsense consisting of occasional truths.
The vast majority of the professoriate are a-scientific, anti-science, or incompletely scientific – repressive. It is a fact.
I’m tired of the infantile sexuality of the culture advising me. The true methods of sexuality is a “painfully,” literal “mechanical” one, which would make the normal culture thinking: “who the fuck talks like that?” Being a “dork,” as they would say, is a good thing. It’s what you’re supposed to try to become.
There are major professionals teaching to generations that there is no Truth. (You got to be joking me.) They claim that there is no good & evil, right & wrong. It’s such an easy fad for even aging guys keeping themselves as non mechanical as possible to not be seen as “awkward.”
Narratives are maintained by idiots who have, with their fake virtues, a wrong understanding of reality by the “experience” of liking things & products, & they have complexes that sharing opinions with others makes them qualified – barely any mental experiences & barely experiential learning, mostly sensation fixation.
Females “evolved,” to have personality disorders. The most commonly obvious ones are narcissistic personality disorder, histrionic personality disorder, & delusion is also a major one, among others. Why is it that when society regards evolution, they always make the assumption that both sexes shared evolution? They didn’t. Men evolved. Women barely did.
Just my personal observation, I have noticed that, for analytical reasons of mine, whenever I witness BDSM sites, there is much more emphasis by women. I’ve seen a lot more lesbian, or lesbian experimenters, managing & interested. The men involved have a lot less energy with it than they do. Men might have the organizational skills to front such communities, but women are much more insistent with it.
This calls for an extremely ethical mass reporting & testing by males to select traits males want.
Bluntly & simplistically because I don’t have time for semantics: women selectively breed & encourage males to have personality disorders like women do, keeping men in the past, or maybe a better way of putting it is no real personality, you’re just simply a “propulsion” grunting retardation to the whore, which is why no men should even take women’s tests seriously. (Which reminds me that being intellectual with women can work because, even though some males don’t like that method because they don’t want to have her as a combative peer, a lot of times they actually just parrot you like a little kid if it’s done a certain way.)
You don’t actually need to stabilize her if she is already committed, i.e., is prone to truly love you, which is why BDSM is really kind of a joke. Whenever I interact with whores, as they try to see if they can switch to me to get more accommodations for their privileges, without telling me they already have another initially, they have a tendency afterwards of saying “my boyfriend doesn’t let me hang out with other guys.” They say this of a way that discloses no real integrity – no real personal, serious consciousness.
The culture threatened by REAL male-centrism casts male exploration & experimentation as “peter-pan syndrome,” yet suffering & struggling is worshiped by gynocentrism. Masculinity is celebrated as almost mindless toil because females have the exclusive ownership of creation. Men are actually the ones who have assisted birth with female literal self destruction.
In a gynocentric culture, the masculine birthright of peace, for a lack of a better word is ruined: The boy lives in a world where struggling of the collective unconscious of the past is encouraged by gynocentrism. The child then bonds to struggling. This bonding then becomes an addiction to struggling. The male then creates situations of struggling to stir the main feelings of satisfaction.
Besides defending destructive trendy culture, which inculcates that individuated/mental males are “embarrassing,” females will even defend convicted criminals – as long as they’re exciting/”non-awkward.” The “assault” on mentally self-controlled males – calling them all these irrelevant” things as “awkward” – is the basis for every impulsive agenda of the whore. It bestows them leeway to indulge with thugs/immature, lame men & murderers.
While women strive for various styles, they actively appose real variation.
Erin Pizzey, writer on issues of domestic violence, which was even suppressed in England, addressed groups of workers described as having staff burnout. It occured when all provisions were made, yet women would still return to violent situations.
Just take the violent situations out of the equation. What do you get? Other types of burnout due to women.
Also, consider that emotional violence, which is more feminine, can be extremely cruel.
Anyway, all forms of violence occurs with both sexes, the most common for of female physical violence is proxy. So much for the theory that only men are aggressors.
Some claim that women who are attracted to violent/unhealthy relationships have daddy-issues, but there is not enough evidence for me to believe that’s mostly true, & there are mass demographics of females, of many consumers, to have amoral, bad tendencies. Knowing the “bipolar” nature of female men’s rights activists, I question Erin Pizzey’s potential level of cognitive dissonance.
The communities who have failed to build a structure necessary to provide an anti-naive way are the ones who are habituated to feel the ebb & flow of excitement & uncaring attitudes.
Warped masculinity is by the fact that women like men for a period, then deject/forget – literal anti-masculinity. It requires an excess for female inconsistency to be lessened.
In a foul, ineffectual nation, masculinity copes too well to not even realize it: the adjustment results with an addiction to instincts & struggle.
Erin Pizzey makes no serious mention that males who have degrees of immoral behavior have had major influence from the maternal. E.P. only makes the isolated argument that women who are attracted to the drama & excitement of a violent/immoral man just have daddy-issues.
Family counselor, Jesse Lee Peterson, with other studies, has stated that most violent male offenders come from single female-headed household.
It’s true: both from experiential learning of female collectivism, as well as empirical data, most males I’ve known who were raised by single mothers, or had too much influence from the maternal, had some serious personality disorders, or were impolite.
By first impression, you can’t discern the exact influence that would make mothers poor candidates, but drama tends to be more intimate/inclusive.
There’s an aspect about female nature that’s very destructive, as they feed on negative energy.
Stating “correlation does not imply causation” is a very fashionable thing. The relationship between women & immoral behavior is very real ( you can investigate the citations on end), as women have a tendency to, not only set conditions by their abuse, most often hypocritical, immature, emotionally-charged, also have limitation of understanding, & fueling more of it, on some kind of force, tainting decision making on the age-range when consciousness hasn’t even seriously developed.
Suicide rate of youth from fatherless homes is much more frequent, behavioral disorders are more frequent, high-school quitting, etc.. Without the male having proper diagnostics & help, the mother assigns emotionally damaging pills.
Women need to be noticed by mass culture to not be allowed to have any control of what is critical.
When Ann Coulter, which I don’t promote extremely – she’s not that impressive, explained some of these points on the Father Albert show, most of the women in the audience just proved her points by exhibiting primal responses.
Sure, not all males who have a major maternal schooling will become criminals, but the point is is that it can happen, & they usually adopt some level of immorality.
When pain & pleasure become mixed of early childhood, the result is further abuse.
Erin Pizzey records a case of, & it is an integral one, When 5 years of age, a girl named Olga was smacked by hand. As she felt a sense of fear & anxiety, she suddenly got a warm, tingling pleasure within her whole body.
She began to seek more.
Sexual intercourse was meaningless years later. It was extreme beatings she wanted.
What Paul Julius Moebius concluded – that the woman is an imbecile due to her physiology – has given me two conclusions:
According to researchers at Rutgers University, pain tolerance, which I’m not arguing for, happens during female orgasm, which is noticeable of how different it is than that of males, as well as that brain regions became more engaging during stimulation & orgasm.
Because of that, it gives masculinity, 1, more reason to have women sexually androcentric for the most part, to give females analgesics & stress relief, &, 2, to keep them with something busy, not tainting masculine studies.
I don’t think Erin Pizzey is intellectually honest (or gets it): Even though she makes a distinction of violence prone women, who will cling to such situations, & the other type, who can get with a violent relationship, will love the man but hate his violence, there is an unwillingness to address female amorality, which has it’s very basis of females being sensation creatures of various flexibility. They’re not intellectual creatures.
Women use words, & I define use as exploit, to further their drives of sensations.
Professionals are inhibited by policies. Policies are due to survival mechanisms. Survival mechanisms are due to female collectivism: “I can’t say that to my peers because I could lose my job, etc.. If I lose that, I could lose chance with a whore.”
It is further axioms that women are delusional on many levels: The adrenaline rush women want of some ways are burdening society with, which gives them more false beliefs, suddenly they feel like they are super-human, or something.
It’s partly why whores have the delusional fetish of an “invincible” masculinity, or something like that, that they think they’re going to get, & then when women interpret that he’s not, she then ruins him. It’s no wonder that women just run out of men, as they sift them out periodically before & after being with them for an indefinite amount of time. It’s almost as if they run out of them to keep themselves from ever realizing how delusional they are & that what they fantasize about doesn’t really exist (other than some sloppier versions).
People who are aggressive have inferiority complexes anyway, or are not intelligent. The wrinkles on ones skin are earned by age. A more reserved personality is earned by having more intelligence.
I’ve typed about what a spectrum is, but consider this: the color red can have other associations: The hybrid color: metallic pink-orange is not red, but it is associated with red.
Daddy-issues or not, there is a wealth of information – anecdotal, i.e., alert to female collectivism, as well as empirical – of how immature the spectrum, without using the word immature, of female sexuality actually is.
I think Erin Pizzey has a sort of “Tom Boy” condition of accumulating some information because she didn’t make it as really attractive, & I don’t mean that from a subjective way: Most men would not have the strong urge to have sex with her, so, because of her practical approach, she likely doesn’t even realize aspects about her own collective (or she denies it).
Yeah, beauty can be subjective on occasion, but you don’t need citations to make the general axiom that most men have a universal preference of a body figure.
There is a general trend of female psychology that “to punish is to improve,” or “the different is creepy,” etc.. They love facades of alternative lifestyles, but they hate alternative strategies.
There is a compulsory aspect about males who are burdened with female collectivism.
So I saw this group of teenage kids, wasting time, smoking, drinking at a park. There was one girl. I approached to school them. Talked to them a little, then ended it with: “you guys are wasting your time with her: when she finds another guy with better cigarettes, she’s going to “stab you in the back.”” Then I mocked them: “Yo, yo, dog, smoke weed.” I fled because they were preparing 4 vs. 1. Both sexes of that instance devalued me – “pussy” – because I didn’t give them entertainment. Get some potential brain damage, etc. – what kind of logic is that?
Bad guys are first for whores. They’ll introduce you to drugs, clumsy, feminine sex, & rock-n-roll. Good guys are for paying the bills.
Let me deconstruct a quote by Erin Pizzey:
“If society follows this pattern of moral decline, the future for children in this country looks even bleaker than the present.
………… a deep greedy need of self-service. They got where they are by a ruthless driving ambition. ( E.P. also makes distinctions of different types of violence. She notes of “intellectual” violence of middle-class, of which some ‘go mad’) ….contended human beings seldom seek high office.”
That’s the essential samples of a couple of her paragraphs.
My question is: What are the events & actions that serves as a stimulus & initiate or precipitates those series of reactions? The appetition of women does. Because female collectivism is the opposite of “spiritual” nature, it produces more primal instincts of man, unnoticed by mechanization.
When I was reading some of Erin Pizzey’s work, even though she associates with men’s rights activists, she seems more like a feminist.
She even gives her feminine tendecies of stating: “I have never met a monster, only vulnerable, confused, grief-stricken people expressing their pain in rage and despair.” – female lame morality. She probably masturbated to violent beastiality porn afterwards.
The “monstars”, implied by women, are harmless males. You get the point. I’m being provocative It’s not an issue of semantics.
Your decisions are much better by your information, & the really extraordinary information is, whether intentionally or not, stopped by female nature.
If all you’ve known your entire life is a poor way of living, then you think it’s “great.”
America is a culture of the archetype of “Thanatose” – death. The entertainment is a large portion of the information that we get.
This is not “social constructs” or “social engineering” of its core. It’s that women have men operating as “compulsory”, for a lack of a better word. Women also like their surroundings to be familiar: they want you, like them, to have have various forms of histrionic personality disorders: they weed out the masculine men from the effeminate men.
I hate anything that involves violence. It’s not even necessarily a “sensitive” thing. It’s just: How can I even take that seriously?
Why would you want to make obscurantist what shouldn’t be. Women are the ones who are obsessed with making it that way.
As female’s less evolved selection is contaminating the social pool, Female romance/sexuality is infested with fickleness, immaturity, additionally to women being clumsy & not even knowing how affection of quality works, drama & horror/suspense themes.
The reason this is is the same phenomenal parallel of the majority of artists who don’t actually have real talent. Most people don’t have real creativity. When you go to even the most extreme concerts, you see people doing the same thing, & there is trends of making their presentations dramatic because they don’t actually have any real creativity. There’s no need for the artificial like that.
This is the way that female sexuality is as well: Female sexuality is a soap-opera because they feel the need to over-hype & dramatize to maintain the female ego.
The only point that Erin Pizzey makes that I fundamentally agree with is that she states that experiences can cause addictions.
There are many men now who are defeatist, which is understandable, because they learned from experience, while naive little-boys keep persuading to apply male versions of cosmetics for women.
Nichiren’s View of Women by Mori Ichiu – Japanese Journal of Religious Studies, Vol. 30, No. 3/4, Feminism & religion in Contemporary Japan (Fall, 2003), pg. 279
fMRI scans reveal why pain tolerance goes up during female orgasm and shows brain does not turn off by Bob Yirka – medicalxpress-dot-com
Getting Men Involved: The Newsletter of the Bay Area Male Involvement Network (author(s) not specified.) – fathermag-dot-com
Single Moms Raising More Violent Men by Jesse Lee Peterson – wnd-dot-com
The Emotional Terrorist & The Violence-Prone by Erin Pizzey, pg. 15, 38, 53, 59, 60, 105, 135
How I Learnt Not To Be Afraid And Love Bukkake by Max Hydrogen – Sheddingoftheego-dot-com
Study finds marijuana use is associated with dating violence by Roberta Jenkins, August 13, 2017 – psypost-dot-org
Consumption of alcohol and marijuana associated with lower GPA in college – PLOS, March 8, 2017
BrainWashed by Ben Shapiro pg.: XV, 1
Chain Reaction: Einstein to The Atomic Bomb by Walter Isaacson, March 2008 issue – Discover Magazine
Men and women have different views on the most effective way to flirt by Eric W. Dolan, October 24, 2017 – psypost-dot-org
How young women convince men who want to use a condom to have unproted sex instead by Eric W. Dolan, October 29, 2017 – psypost-dot-org
Millennial Women Are Starting To Hit THe Wall by Vincent Law, July 27, 2017