The young males are the the most influenced by sociology derived via the success of the fewer men who gave to female greed. They apply this: “You know how girls like it when you act like kind of a dick?” Tattoos are another aspect of this same cosmetic. They studied this self-help – sociology – & used it to stop thinking about serious issues. If you think this is wrong because it’s not biologically probabilistic, the pretense as a product of sexual cronyism has the ability to induce social engineering. When you see aesthetics of these stupid gauged ears, etc., that is LITERALLY social constructing/ engineering. Women create so much fake nonsense by way of allowing/”voting.” Women CHOOSE men who are concerned with the latest fads & novelty. Paradoxically, most of this novelty is a product of archaic/primitive behavior of men who now have delusions of being “elite,” which women subscribe to.
There’s this pervasive attitude that the contrarian styles have that they are “different,” “better,” or whatever, than the supposed “jocks” or “yuppies.” But all these people, with their rendition of their popularity contests, have done is they’ve just replaced what they claim to be antithetical to with another immature, non-evolved contest mentality: These idiots are constantly reinventing their image, making provocations, contriving the artificial so that they can just “fluidly slide in & out” of their inconsistency when they’re questioned, & expecting others to acknowledge their next front & excitement their going to provide.
What they’ve done is they’ve just re-dressed the same identity to give themselves the belief that they’re “not” like that.
Paradoxically, the fact that they believe they’re of focal worth creates the belief of uniformity/identity of the same rank/parity/likeness/equipoise: That people, rather than constructing, producing by eclectic abstraction, have to be obligated to worshiping them or else their “missing” something of their lives – the idea that others are with their level: participating with their casual culture & dealing with “living in a pigpen/rolling in their own dung.”
Grow up, kids, get a life, instead of the “brawn,” the immediate, & parasitical inflation.
So I was having a debate with this idiot with tattoos all over his body. He stated that my content is boring. I told him that’s not how science works. By his logic, if a doctor told him that he needed to minimize meats because of cardiovascular problems (which they most likely wouldn’t because doctors would more likely try to sell prescription pills instead) & eat a lot more plants, that doctor would be, according to him, “invalid” because it’s boring. I’m not going to have semantic arguments about the subjective nature of existence. You know what I mean: Science doesn’t really deal with the subjective. It deals with the objective.
So this is kind of revenge towards that guy for calling me a “pussy” & for the notion that he knows so much. Maybe if he actually spent as much time as I do studying instead of wasting it for tattoos, drugs, etc., he’d be qualified enough.
Origins of body modifications, both as inflicted bodily hollowing, as well as bodily congesting:
What are some products after instincts? Rites are some of them. From the North/West, some of these rites were flaunting with armor on horses, etc..
Although Africa, Australia, & some parts of the East have a male-empowerment of polygamy, other rites crippling masculinity has its origins in some of those places.
Does this seem like a sustainable way (defined as r/k selection): to have males perform so much by Western, etc., culture that it causes slow reproduction due to monogamy & chivalrous rites, etc.? Those wasting time pea-cocking male power displays will be out-reproduced by others, who simply are mostly eating & reproducing oriented.
Western types of women have participated with the pattern of using beta males (the quality males who actually created society) during the ~30 ages by re-appropriating their descriptions as “alpha.” This inaccurate description owned by females is one society is unaware of, causing beta males to lose proper appeal.
 Circumcision, also originally a type of pea-cocking by alpha males, has its first origins as initiation ceremonies. Subincision is done in Australia. With a sharp chipped piece of flint, subincision is the cutting of the penile urethra opened from meatus to scrotum. Indo-Germanic, Mongols, Finno-Ugrian people were completely unacquainted with it before modernity.
Whatever form of male disposing, (which the previously typed polygamy is not. It is androcentric), whether self inflicted harm for status symbols or conquest of stressful situations for status symbols, it retards true male power.
Contrary to what some might assume, the rites were not by barely controlled aggression because of the obvious destructive connotations, which it is. The rites were actually done due to obsession with new life. It is all orientation of cults dedicated to the goddess – birth, menstrual blood, fertility.
I believe that females generally like to believe that sexuality should have some connotations of competition due to the fact that women bleed.
What is it about the male psyche that would wrongly make him believe that sexuality has more connotation of competition than it actually has? Not menstruation per se, but the fear & stress of navigating in socializing:
1: The explicitly sexual.
2: Work-life. The whole concept of sex as “nock me” comes from the survival mechanisms of work-life, etc.: People are so pressurized, often without even realizing it, & infected with instincts from being too busy that they bring that to sexuality.
It is well known of the initiation rites of violence that gangs intimidate new members with. Circumcision originates with the exact same idea: a male must join groups’ common cohabitation with females. This resembles very stupid alpha males’ desires to prove their worth. Circumcision, which is really just body modification that has morphed as medical practice, originated with pre-literate man trying to master fear by trying to show displays of power to be liked by women. Rather than admitting that they have fear, the ~20-~10%, arbitrary masculinity creates an idea that aggression is somehow a “negation” of fear by trying to muster it, much like a practice of violent sexuality, which women set as the model of varying degrees because they extrapolate from only what they see. Think of it this way: Why would you sometimes be loud/scream? It’s to compensate for fear. They might not readily make it understood that they have fear, but aggression originates from fear.
I remember when I was having sex with a female when I was younger, I was doing it very fast & hard, pulling her hair, etc.. It was not standardized BDSM with all the systems & tools, etc.. It was just fast/hard. I remember when I got tired & I had her on top just to regulate by breathing, she actually had less respect for me. The point is: women use all this primitive body language – BDSM – to extrapolate what man can survive the “best.”
It all just comes from the female tendency to resent moral guys (also a fear-based mentality – fear of the unknown: women don’t seriously know these men (sometimes use)) & generally slander them.
Women will claim “we have respect for men who don’t put us on a pedestal, & who will have leadership skills.” This is totally misguiding. It is a fascination with the man thumping down 10 enemies, etc.. This is not real respect. It’s a USE. Using a tool without caring about the rust accumulating isn’t real respect.
With the fear based mentality/aggression the arbitrary masculinity has, the more women will literally unconsciously select social institutions for things like procedures of circumcision.
It is questionable to understand prehistoric events, especially by relying by archeological artifacts that can only give vague suggestions, but it is quite possible of the conjecture that men, originally living with hordes, submitted to the domination of a single (or a few) powerful, violent, jealous masculinity. But how does this make it true that one (or a few) represents masculinity? This is literally an outlier. Science deals with generalities. It only uses outliers as comparisons, yet you get from professional academics frequently that an outlier = “masculinity.” The parallel of that is female sexual selection – deluded: they are attracted to outliers. It’s pseudo science to state that males are supposed to be the unrealistic alpha-male just to entertain women. They are only resorting to social constructs. Women are greedy for what is basically a rare delicacy of a pecking order. The only reason society makes itself believe that it’s more realistic is due to the fact that males use cosmetics. Yes, males have their OWN VERSION OF COSMETICS.
With the dominance hierarchy maintained by outliers of masculinity, various destructive rites occur.
Do you know the reports of what alpha males used to do to other males for interfering with females? It has been reported that they would castrate other males. Fast-forward to now, the beta male shaming is a tame evolution of the same processes. There isn’t castration like that, but there are now metaphorical castrations & other means of control by OUTLIERS, which idiots like Jordan Peterson condone to entertain women, done to healthy masculinity.
Initiated pain as a price children pay for the prerogatives of adulthood – this was the true origins of the rite of circumcision.
Truth is is that most of these alpha-male idiots, whether it’s the leaders of tribes of Australia or whatever, don’t know how to make an easy affection economy, so, instead, they create other things & activities to compensate for what they don’t know how to do.
Browe believes that castration came from the Hittites & went to Semitic & other cultures next. Browe stresses castration among priests of mother goddesses. Other reasons for it was later, but the original can be traced to an axiom of the few inflicting it to gain control of other males’ power. That’s the way it generally is: Defective ringleaders. It’s the same reality as how a brand selling the same product as another would want another brand to fail so that the continuing brand can get more. The apex of masculinity is generally infected with bad ethics because they’re obsessed with power for whores. It’s not masculinity that’s bad. It’s the outliers of masculinity that’s generally bad, & women are generally seeking them.
There are different stories with similar themes: whether it’s mutilations done by apex/elite ringleaders for control, ancient religions of emasculating for mother goddess deities, or priming to be tough, all of these have the lunatic rationalization of ascribing them to gynocentrism. There’s even other accounts of these mutilations due to wanting to be female, or a fear of them.
Whether you do or do not believe the existence of god(s), religion has had an effect on societies before science ever had. Parallel to the history of castration for the Magna Mater, is the biblical story of Zipporah & other numerous reports. News to atheists: The Bible also contains real history. Dismissing it as “that’s not science” is a cop-out. I’m not reporting about you’re understanding of modern science. I’m reporting the arcane. According to these, it was women who imposed circumcision to men.
There’s accounts that circumcision was originally done as sacrifices to a female goddess, & all Semitic cutting was a sacrifice to the goddess of fertility. It can be described as even transactions similar to money.
I know, what a shocker that the personality disorders exhibited in the work-force due to their different hormonal processing could be a remnant of their prime savagery – not.
With cross-cultural similar themes, The New Hebrides explicitly state that women invented circumcision.
Factually, African Azande women prefer it. [Reported: 1954] With no or little religion, & with women having rejected uncircumcised men, it is a trend in the Congo & Sudan.
Then there’s the other possibility: that cutting was done due to mens’ envy of her power to bear young, then the men (ringleaders – there’s the fewer to spoil it for others) regarded women as responsible for the rites, or the other possibility is that men should bleed from their genitals.
The possibility of envy could be true because subincision is done in few parts of the world.
Blood is believed by primitives to evoke magic. Subincision is the effusion of blood, which has a probable correspondence to female menstruation  – feminization, & one of the explanations for the psychology of this is that the male “needs to fill the emotional vacuum created by their inability to bear children.”
Female sports enjoyment causes males to adopt sadistic & masochistic tendencies. If you believe a domino-effect is only physical, you are mistaken. Domino-effects are also psychological.
While it is quite probable that society was founded by homicidal men, then changed evil tendencies, women took that earlier psychology further. These men are “demon possessed” & they need to be exorcized by fanatical, fundamentalist extremists.
There is ideas that secret societies hoodwink women: The men use other men as pawns, don’t mind killing a few boys to convince the women for the given reasons. With the casual deflection of “autism being the new “paranoid conspiracy theorist,” yes, even when it involves their casual indulgence of entertainment, I’ll type it anyway: This is the axiom though of ‘The Lord Of The Rings’ “One ring to bind them,” some are trying to attain it’s crippling mind control. The ringleaders have joined the dark-side by becoming traitors.
The story of ‘Genesis’ in ‘The Bible’ is symbolic. If you read such works like you do science – literally, you are likely symbol illiterate, & will, like a numerous amount of religious people, not even understand it:
The “tree of life” is a study of anatomy: The spine is like a tree with roots & branches of afferent & efferent nerves. The “tree of life” has many enjoyable “fruits” – sensations. But, because of the technical & impractical application of accessing the practice, it has been garbled. Only those with strict, “robotic” self control can have the knowledge.
This serpent that tempted Eve was not the first will of the penis of Adam that “manipulated” eve. The serpent is a force that is not meant to be dabbled with without proper instruction. It was the evil of Eve that was interested with being impatient, as women think they can just greedily get almost whatever they want with little consideration of the consequences for others, to disregard precise reason. Harnessing spinal centers of occult energy can be very dangerous & change your plans that warp your life. The empowering knowledge can only be inclusive to males with the most extremist, fanatical, fundamentalism by the maxim of: MY BODY IS A TEMPLE, & I WILL NOT DEFILE IT, not by partying with animals. This boycotting would change a lot of business for corporations – the same corporations who live by poorly self-controlled instincts, presented as “well-adapted”, with reactions of feelings overpowering true reason. It is for whores to make treasures by distributing & polluting your psychology with tobacco, meats packaged as machismo, sugar (the bad kinds of sugars. You need other sugar), GMO, alcohol packaged as “interesting or intellectual,” dairy, & the list continues. Women have dominated men by monopolizing that maxim of “my body is a temple” for mainly themselves (even when they’re still slovenly – “don’t fat-shame”), & doling the social status for males helping preserve the irrelevant meaning of “boring.” This social status has accepted the idea of “romance has got to die.” Romance is self control & very logical with collected vital masculine energy.
Tantric sex is not the type of sex that is associated with aggressive lust done on this planet. Tantric sex is a different, totally euphoric type of sex that can be magnified by the millions with an immersion of care.
Eating by mostly craving rather than thought causes a type of body modification, congesting the body. The persuasions, damaging the body, is not much different than how people get tattoos. With machismo, they try to persuade to you that not eating enough meat causes low T. & reduces the vitamins you “need.” That’s debatable. However, what about ethics. What about other living entities? Eating meat is unethical, & none of this “I eat free range animals” excuses changes it. Someone needs to stop the cycle. (Muscles, particularly oysters, might be acceptable.)
My main concern is vascularity not machismo. Machismo is a male cosmetic.
The difference of male cosmetics compared to female cosmetics is that male cosmetics, due to males being more abstract creatures, is much more elaborate. Female cosmetics are very easy.
The vascularity of a strict, stoic, ascetic plant diet combined with speed exercises for endurance is what I do. I want endurance not strength. The best option for ultimate vascularity is a plant-based diet.
This machismo is exhibited, for example, because Japan is a perfect example of sheep mentality/shame culture with probably the most preserved hypergamy, of a developed nation by the work-obsessed [reported: 2000]. That’s not the real you. They have a more linear culture – playing with their tech-toys like babies with barely any significant wisdom, but what’s the point when meaning has been deprived? It is like ordering a collection of books yet never having any free time to even learn the mysteries of reality. Yeah, hypergamy helps evolution, right, that makes sense – not. How can you know other evolution if you’ve been so used to only one idea of evolution? During the past decade of Japan, Japanese executives feel that vacation users are disloyal to peers. Vacations of more than a week are rare. They often don’t even know what to do with their leisure time. Abused masculinity is her entertainment. Wives who haven’t seen much of each other for years have “leisure stress.” I don’t even know what that report is supposed to mean, but it was reported that this is a reason for increasing divorce rates.
They have automatic obedience. Confucianism/Japanese culture teaches not to question, etc. – superficial “evolution.’ This is a fake dominance which transcends them. Real dominance is thinking-outside-the-box. To many people, “dominance” is something physical or readily seen. They are taught to not do something because people will laugh.
The western version is basically the contrasting version of the same thing: “Having uncool warmth & not doing trends will have you laughed at,” for a lack of a better description.
Their chauvinism is also fake because it’s just by the automatic obedience to business – male cosmetics of machismo/fake dominance.
Another aspect of fake dominance of Western society is so many various opiates for the masses for those too lazy & fragile to realize reality – REAL dominance. Persuasions by the trendy that marijuana “enhances consciousness” does not work for me. Oxygen is one of your brains primary sources of energy. The brain demands 20% of total oxygen intake. The lungs weigh 2% of your body weight, so that intake is a lot. Without a continuous supply of intake, brain cells die. Yeah, smoking marijuana makes you smart – not.
The “orgonomic” principle is that without the inclusion of tranquility realizations, the vulnerability & risk, thanks to females dominating the social of youngsters, will cause self-abuse, more often times like the machismo of Japanese shame-culture.
This is not by an appeal to authority, this is just logic: When bio-energy is damned, it results with irrationality, perversion, neurosis.
There’s an idea that women are more anti-prude, for a lack of a better word, but they’re actually more repressive, more disapproving because you have to provide cheap entertainment, & this is the kind of entertainment that stupid people laugh at.
Again, with female domination of the social, male experts are seen as “creepy,” etc.. It inhibits true male liberation by knowledge of the masculine self:
The membrane surrounding neurons & internal energy producers, mitochondria, is the lipid bilayer . It’s comprised of certain fats & Omega-3, DHA.
The protein obsessed say that we “need” Omega-3 from fish, but the problem is that fish is packed with EXCESSIVE protein, congesting the body. With conflicting studies, you have to know what corporations FUND those studies firstly. It’s basically bribing the same way that women bribe men to present fake “dominance.”  Fish can’t produce omega-3. They have to get it from algae.
The lipid membrane of the brain is extremely susceptible to peroxidation, a damaging form of free radical attack. Acetylaldehyde, which is done by alcohol waste, by the implication of females that “you’re boring, creepy, a wuss” if you’re more concerned about yourself, & a fast-action purchasing of bad brain fats & foods & stress, causes the brain to experience severe levels of free radicals. It has been reported to be like pouring acid on skin 
Negative ions of mountains, trees, etc., increases flow to the brain.  Negative ions are also believed to increase serotonin.
Many polluted areas have low levels of oxygen & less negative ions, & even have neurotoxins. Offices of work-environment, & when I type environment, I really do mean environment because living is done in places not meant to be lived, that recirculate air are ion depleted.
Paradoxically, the fake “dominance”/machismo – herd instinct for whores – typed earlier about the Japanese toil has also caused males to become more effete.
Exercise not only increases blood flow to the hippocampus, learning & memory zone, it can also increase new brain cells – neurogenesis, & has been shown to increase amount of recently retained info. 
Some will quote Paracelsus (1493-1541) :
“..all substances are poison. The right dose differentiates a poison & a remedy.”
When have women allowed serious differentiation when they imply studious males to be “creepy,” etc.?
A conflict of ethics could be the argument that plants are still predatory:  Unlike animals, they can’t run away, so an evolutionary strategy is: poison. Alright, you might have an argument, but do plant based diet for vascularity anyway.
The most probable food-related cancers are, & this is not “living life with fear,” from traditional foods:  red meats, poultry (very bad protein), badly prepared grain/bread, certain starches, sugar, chocolate, & excessive salt, drug residues, pesticides, additives. Life is a technical, intricate chess-game. It’s not a “fear” that I have.
You’re likely to get cancer by bad/ill informed choice of food.
I’d even say: maybe grow your own plants.
Don’t think that all plants are good though. I mostly do cruciferous plant diet. It’s not for pleasure. It’s for logic.
Overweight people have even been reported to have smaller hippocampus zones of the brain.  66% of Americans are considered overweight.
Trans fats are the worst type of fat for the brain. French fries, cookies, cakes, pastries, potato chips, fried chicken, etc. – very bad. The molecules, refined by industry, can attach to capillary walls & membranes, slowing intracellular communication.
Additionally to animal & dairy products contributing to cardiovascular disease, insulin resistance, Alzheimer’s stroke, diabetes & obesity, chronically elevated glucose, insulin, alcohol, cortisol levels causes brain inflammation  – another type of body modification due to the impulse to not think for women. Nothing bores a woman so much as a thinking man interested with himself. They own you with this.
Have you ever noticed that some of the most p.c. people who will violently or erratically appose these types of philosophies presented with pro-male spaces are generally the ones who religiously consume soda, cookies, croissants, etc., & other forms of “fast paced” degeneracy? Wasting yourself with foods that are high on the glycemic index is what sets the sugar insulin toxicity, & even causes COGNITIVE IMPAIRMENT. YOU READ CORRECTLY: EATING THESE JUNK/SUGAR FOODS RETARDS THE MIND.  These idiots are too concerned with racing home to their movies, etc., to precisely read the ingredient sections. Any carb over 50 on the index is considered a high-glycemic carb. All that for their sugar-rush is what puts you – the philosopher – at risk for disturbing them.
Alcohol is also one source of hidden blood sugar toxicity. Combine that with the typical diet, they get even more damage. “Lets relax. Lets have a good time” – fucking idiots, & it’s all due to their association with the feminine, yet these are the same type of people who will persuade to you to “not be beta”/don’t follow a woman’s lead,” yet they’re doing just that: They’re following a woman’s lead. REAL dominance by males is boring & stern.
The metabolic processing of alcohol causes production of a chemical called acetylaldehyde – AH. AH harms the brain. It misappropriates brain nutrients, especially vitamin B1, B5, & B6. AH also disharmonizes an important enzyme called Acetyl Coenzyme – CoA. Your mitochondria produce 90% of energy – ATP – for the entire brain. The mitochondria get raw ingredients needed to produce ATP from CoA.
DHA, Magnesium, B Vitamins, & many other essential nutrients are depleted by alcohol.
Alcohol shrinks the brain – literally.
They say: “moderate red wine might be good for you.” It is actually NOT the alcohol in wine that is brain beneficial. It’s the flavonoids of the skin & seeds of dark grapes. Saying that red wine is good for you is kind of, after dragging spinach in used toilet paper, like saying it’s “good for you.”
It’s not that males who waste a lot of money on thousands of vinyl records, video games, etc., are necessarily what women & female MRAs consider “socially retarded.” It’s that females own social structures with no outlet for males who aren’t truly willing to do what they do, even if they pretend, so the result is them substituting empowering assembly with more destructive assembling.
Had they found Eastern thought, Buddhism, etc., they would find truth much more empowering than Jordan Peterson, who will even hijack stories of Buddhism as decorations for his own gain.
Definition is important because, to communicate about technical subjects, we must know meaning.
Buddhism has been called a religion. Religion refers to belief in another power controlling the universe. Buddhism understands controlling the mind by the self. Religion has an emotional component, which Jordan Peterson loves. Pure Buddhism does not share the sentiment. Buddhism is not really a religion.
Philosophy means love of wisdom/knowledge. Female nature is an abuser of philosophy.
There are two types of philosophical thinking: metaphysics & phenomenology. Metaphysics is the study of absolute or first principles. It doesn’t need to appeal to authority (a female instinct). It simply thinks it’s way to discover. Metaphysics is also sometimes called the science of ontology, study of essence. Phenomenology is the description of things as they are experienced by the individual: it is the science of epistemology, the study of things as they are known.
Psychology is the study of the mind & mental states. Like philosophy, it has two aspects: pure psychology – general study of mental phenomena. The other is psychotherapy/applied psychology – adjusting disease, etc..
Buddhism, with it’s strict morality, study of the mind/psychology, & philosophy is extremely rational & logical.
A book by Christine A. Chandler: ‘Enthralled: The Guru Cult of Tibetan Buddhism’ slanders Buddhism because of the ascetic discipline to save oneself for superior realizations rather than short, temporary, immediate gratification. The book is nothing more than moral-guy shaming. 
Who is trying to educate the next generation on the net? A lot of leftists: The New York Times, T.Y.T., Vox, & others.
What is the source of this? You guessed it: the ordination by women.
Neocon expansionism by persuasion of consumption is another aspect of the left while not even calling itself the left.
Fun is prioritized over science, just like how the fun presentation of the iconic milk mustache by celebrities to condone dairy. What is their actual relevance when they are “whores” for money?
Ice cream is fun, but it’s not scientific to eat it to have ill effects.
The USDA’S persuasion to drink 3 glasses is not based on strict science. 
Some of the contributors of the USDA food pyramid actually work for the dairy industry, which means that it’s about money interests, not science. (This article does not pertain to breast milk for development.)
They are motivated by money/survival/gynocentrism rather than science. That’s the way money works. Hypergamy doesn’t “push evolution.” (Other than a little bit.)
The guide of the early 1990s to have 6-11 servings daily of bread, sugar, carbs, cereals & pasta caused the largest epidemic of obesity of the history of our species. 
These USDA food policies are used in school programs.
It is true that food industries know about chemicals, manipulate ingredients to stimulate addictive cycles, &, yes, they are REAL addictions, not just pleasure. 
Soda contains caffeine – a stimulant & diuretic, & salt. When you excrete salt & liquids, you become thirsty. Soda brands hide lots of salt with sugar in their drinks to get you addicted to them. It’s a very clever business strategy. 
Conventional wisdom states that excessive full-fat dairy increases the risk of heart disease due to excessive saturated fat content, yet wisdom is decreased when life-styles of instincts are accepted.
So what answers do I give? Try the Okinawa diet. Those who comprise of the Okinawan diet, a totally different system with people who live to be centenarians more than those of a neo-con diet, have reduced rates of arteriosclerosis. You add saturated fats, the average cholesterol increases. People who live to be 100 don’t eat foods rich with saturated fats. They CONTROL with a little. (your definition of “dominance” is equal to a cartoon character) They don’t have a lot. They eat almost NO dietary fat in Okinawa, so that’s a major argument to completely restrict animal products to zero.
Get this: Real men are not moderate. Real men are fanatical, but if you really want to have an issue of semantics, they’re the ones who are actually extremists: causing hazards to themselves all because they want to accept casual culture.
There is much more about the hazards of incompetent outliers/traitors for whores retarding the nutritional & thriving power of other males. However, YOU give me facts. YOU pump out 100s of articles.
It’s quite possible that you can’t pump out 100s of articles, even when you claim to be anti-feminist, etc., because you’re the type of person who “rapes” bookstores. You might be anti-feminist, but you’re still “anti-consciousness”/pro-female: “Don’t be nice,” etc.. Do you know the true reason that women don’t like fundamentalist moralists as myself? For the same reason that kids buy bongs instead of books. For the same reason that people tortured Jesus Christ when he was found a criminal for protesting hypocrites. The meme of “dorks” comes from this societal tendency to be traitors for cheap/immature/unskilled lust. For the same reason that people support theatres instead of what they think looks “tacky” – book covers, which is a reason that some of them would buy books superficially – for the gloss, only to afterwards think: “What am I going to do with these books?” They’re so inured by entertainment that they have the true “peter pan” syndrome. These people would probably even kick you down stairs if they had the chance simply because they don’t like how perfectly oblivious you are to their sports-teams, which reminds me of how I was threatened in Phoenix, Az. to get the police called because I was asking for customer service.
FUCK YOU, Phoenix. You have no culture. I don’t need to provide another citation about this, as I already have with one of my other articles, because I’m not appealing to authority. I’m using logic because I can use strict self control: I’m not controlled by entertainment. Your definition of culture is bong-shops & the lard-storage Mexican food places people go to between another binge of their lack of self-control, like those stupid “pagans” dancing around a fire. This is one of the most emasculated places you can go to. Meaning: dumb/hostile people dictating how smart people “should” be. I don’t mean emasculated by how the popular would define it. I have a peer who thinks that women here own the way others live by even fashion. According to him, they don’t like men wearing sun-glasses because it has a “creepy” effect of not allowing them to read men – control them – as easily. It’s possible. One thing is for certain: they don’t like my solitude & will slander it as “shady,” etc..
I was watching a very brief segment regarding A food-place called Dick’s. This place makes money with a theme of being rude to customers. As I was watching it, I thought, this is just how people, “professional” or otherwise, are in Phoenix, Az.. The people who are constantly seeking novelty, when having boundaries, principles, judgement is seen as “awkward,” will inevitably create the degeneracy of society.  They are making a monopoly of being anti-ethics, which is a product of the pattern of female socializing.
Friedrich Nietzsche, addicted to hyperbole, totally over-rated & nothing compared to Otto Weininger, knew these tendencies of people of some ways, so he wanted to preserve himself & not get infected by the rest. His problem is that he, unlike Otto Weininger who strategically stated that pleasure is immoral, was motivated by entertainment as well. He had MUCH MORE POTENTIAL. With his hyperbole, hence why I state that entertainment is not a friend, it was not the ultimate praxis/skill because, if you realize by results & not his claims, his will to power was easily overpowered by entertainment. Where was his power ultimately when he lived as a bohemian, not much different than the hippies living by a code of entertainment? Seriously, I ask you for answers of the results of how he lived. I’m not going to provide you with an answer. Your turn.
Ayn Rand took Nietzsche’s philosophy to a totally other lover of economics. What does her individuality really translate to? Results is not the claims. Her individuality translates to being reserved for a few, so that predatory competition can “rape” book-stores with fast-impulse chain stores, etc.. Altruism is not mysticism. Altruism is about making the surroundings better because it makes life better. She couldn’t even realize this simple fact. The female psychology/clap-trap will never have the same profound meaning as the visual stimulation that is perennially enjoyed by males – gaining peace by just observing.
‘Adam’ is reason. ‘Eve’ is feeling. When ‘Eve’ overpowers, ‘Adam’ is dominated – what has been the state. Yes, what you have thought about male domination has been a farce.
Eve does not give birth because she’s a “noble warrior.” She gives painful birth because it was punishment for her karmic sin. When you worship women, assist them with chivalry, etc., you are helping them cheat their karmic punishment for what Eve did to Adam – causing him to fall, undermining his immortality. In ‘Adam’, reason predominated. In Eve, feeling was ascendant. Adam’s fall has only given him a sluggish coma to not allow him the reality of this polarity of the phenomenal world – that women are more like enemies than friends, so women need to be uneducated, rid of rights, & only used after they have been malleable to transition to it. We are not womens’ daddies.
Eve got us out of heaven & into “Maya.”
If you can get an infection & become ill, what makes you think that it’s “not” possible to have psychological infections.
Paradoxically, because of the scattered, inconsistent, impulsive nature of females, with little self control of instincts, prioritized & glamorized, females believe that they are entitled to the non-probable male who is perfectly controlling, yet they use the same psychological contamination to sabotage male control.
With this arcane knowledge, males have much more power because, historically, much of female power has been by them as “spies”/collecting data, then abuse the knowledge by giving it to the wrong people – other females, destroying male foundations. We can now use this strategy against them. Go out, teach groups, notify the young. Show that women have no power over you.
The “beta” label is a fail when you start to realize more knowledge. I know these arguments can be an issue of semantics, but when regarding the topic of “beta,” etc., I interpret the results & not the claims, especially when it’s by women. The true reason for the dislike & hatred of moral males with a type of affection of his own & not what the society wants it to be, whether they word it one way or another, while the results are another, but the true reason for “romance has got to die,” etc., whatever you want to call it is (are you ready for this unbelievable realization?) because women have an in-group bias & they allow other males who will be like them.
I can’t even think of enjoying the company of women anymore. I mean, I do solo tantra, & this is not an advertisement for other males to do a dangerous practice that has become somewhat of a topic sometimes, especially because it’s not supposed to be to reward women, but the thought of actually sharing with a woman is disgusting to me. I’ll get something that I want from them, but I’m not going to share more. I gain much more satisfaction by scolding & humiliating women in public then I do by trying to get sex from her. Factually, If I could do worse to them, I would, but there are legal ramifications. I’ll still get sex, but I am on the path of hatred. Hating women is TRUE morality. In night clubs, almost everywhere, women are the ultimate harassers by implication for you to “man up.” It’s not acceptable for males to express sensitivity or even vulnerability. It’s not that women are “trying to bring the best out of you.” It’s that women are looters, both looting treasures & looting psychology, so sharing that to me is extremely unethical.
& I’ll interject: The subject of tantric male vitality is technically an esoteric one. Regarding the chakras, energies when you’re reading any of the books is garbled. Initiation is not by being referred to writings but other secret tests. When you read such books, it’s garbled. It can not be read verbatim, except for the simple facts. Why it’s garbled is because it’s only meant for those those who can conquer the tests of purity.
Those that give you courses regarding chakra balancing, chakra healing, etc., by the new age are ignorant.
There are many truths of the metaphysical.
A person who is trying to get you to buy the practical reasoning will tell you that: hybristophilia is just because women want protection. Not a ultimate reason. The real truth is, according to Eastern esoteric knowledge, women have a record of defilement because they’ve accumulated immoral deeds, which is why they’re attracted to defilement, not because of “protection.”
With the artificial displays of masculinity, no true, really valid expressions, there’s also the counter-culture. These counter-culture idiots are a part of the same pop. culture of many ways, but the most obvious is how they take pride with their relentless craving for trash, & how they hate fundamentalist moralists. They’ll take advantage of how trendy/networking they are & make libels of how “shy,” etc., you are for rightly insulting their entertainment.
Their ego formation is largely masked by a pretense that they’re “strong individuals,” when many of them don’t even have the social skills (probably due to maternal deprivation) to respond cohesively, & as day-care culture replaces social interaction of how people can be realistic with each other, by disruption & disturbance with all these ineffectual digital apps, etc., artifacts of trash, children respond to later situations with hostile, aggressive, inappropriate/FEMININE ways, just like how feminists impose proxy anti-construction:
They are selling these pins for ~$10.00 as collector tributes to Dahmer, Ted Bundy, & the artist GG Allin releasing bowel waste, which I will not put a reference for because it’s unethical to allow them the advertisement – profit seeking with art-war/propaganda to hate/dislike hyper moral males. I’m not “shocked.” I’m just simply making a statement.
Oh, I’m so impressed with your toddler tantrums & delusions of grandeur – not.
One of the most pervasive arenas of hybristophiliacs is counter cultures, not that it excuses the commonly soccer-mom hybristophilia. Counter-cultures are some of the most anti-male places of them all.
I’ve seen an article by one of these female counter-culture idiots extolling how “great” it was that the primitive Mayan culture had various different types of pain-rites, from tattoo-cutting to others. She was proud of stating how this is a type of “self improvement.”  You know the drill: “a transformation thanks to pain,” also sex appeal. The self abuse by males tends to get female attention, which they will encourage, also what hypergamy is. REALITY CHECK: Women enjoy abused masculinity. The similar theme of penile blood letting to compensate for female menstrual cycles was reported. That’s what “equality” does to men.
While they did not have a technical culture before the Spanish came, the explorers, because they’re more abstract, had their own more elaborate forms of self-sabotaging impulses, like the chivalrous jousting, & other stupid warrior symbols, as did other people sharing the same tendencies.
One of the oldest tattoos was discovered on frozen remains of a man, Otzi, ina glacier in the Austrian-Italian border. From c. 3250 BCE, it was discovered during 1991 CE. It was interpreted as for therapeutic reasons. (Which reminds me of this: If one needs to do a fast, as they say that fasting processes accumulation of unhealthy substances in the body, one lost control & is trying to cheat. Many aspects of therapy is the same. It’s people who are cheating because they lost control.)
These body modifications have been found to be a part of more than one ancient place, from Polynesia to Egypt, but they all have the same common theme: branding for someone or something else – trading their own respect for some kind of symbol of security, status of a pack , or, more commonly, as being known as tough, & now that meme has morphed to the subconscious minds of these idiots. That is some fucking whore mentality, & the perfect language for them to use to claim that’s “not” it is by insinuating that you’re a “wuss”/boring. Tattoos have been cultic symbols dedicated to gods, branded symbols of servitude, & now they’re used to display toddler tantrums of stating: “Look at how much I can endure just to tell my story so that I can form my own sense of belonging by signalling to others my endurance.” Endurance of weakness – that’s all it is. They don’t have the endurance to be controlling: They’d rather just lay there, or whatever, & take it all in. They don’t want to be labeled a coward. They’re losers.
Same principle of skateboarders risking injury just to impress people. They might claim they get some kind of “spiritual high” like they’re flying, & I’m sure there’s some of that involved, but it’s mostly just guys with the pea-cocking mentality, albeit a preliminary one.
The women who claim they “don’t do it for attention”/”they just like it for themselves”, etc., are either delusional or it’s even worse: they just subscribe to whatever trends with little thought. The females who do it also signal cliques: “Fuck those moral males.”
The branding makes it appear more worthy than it actually is – some kind of sign of prestige, albeit a supposedly exotic one. They are signs of values devoid of actual real value. Post-industrial/entertainment era societies is polluted with signs of these fake types of value. Most of them have no real significant identity, rather just more signs among others.
The psychology of males is inundated with these signs, brands, & objects. Whatever extreme limits of entertainment he has to participate with, the signs, objects, brands, artificiality & pretense triumph over the masculine subject, like many forms of advertisement, not just commercial, there are auto-smiles & unnecessary expressions, etc.: Smile if you have nothing to say, do not hide the fact that you have nothing to say. With all this inundation of unnecessary, artificial expression, realism only gets reported about immature things. The debate about the politics is the same as the debates about sports feuds.
Electronic cigarettes are associated with “pop corn lungs.” (I mean, it’s pretty self evident, but I’ll provide a reference anyway) this is the point of artificial value & pretense & the very mean spirited implication of society of calling better people “whimps,” making it worse for others who actually have value. Diacetyl is linked to lung disease. When I go looking for a job, I’ve been to numerous vape-stores, they always ask me the same thing: “Do you know about vapes or have experience?” This is the point, why would I have that much info. about these products of pretense if I’m studying neuroscience?(Other than the cognitive social aspects) More importantly: that building used to sell their garbage should be a bookstore. Because I have to live with these stupid people, my life is actually harder.
With more facile identity of women (& men), they do not have a differentiated identity. Tribal badges, fashions, life-styles, etc., do not make the majority of the same to be significantly different. Womens’ attraction/allowing to an archaic masculinity features the repeating pattern of them denouncing males who can’t abide by these badges & life-styles that don’t have any real meaning.
Male cosmetics, whether tattoos or “suits & ties,” are by effete/feeble males who are mostly concerned with the superficial, mate-attracting flash, & minimized capability of having resolving skills because they’ve been cultivating fake/wrong will power, vanity & immediate self-indulgence that compensates for real quality male stimulation & power. This is a mirror image of female social retardation. Development of pathologic emotionally tinged notions of “honor,” “duty,” “bravery,” whatever, are psychic attitudes strongly antithetical to masculine vigor. You’ve seen all these men protecting whores by treating other men unfairly because they don’t know hot to make their will of value.
Women like to punish good guys, & you likely have not noticed it because that’s the way society wants to keep it. Socially retarded punishment or derogation is because they don’t like knowing what they are. It’s not entertaining to have to feel like they look bad when they have a good guy in front of them. They want to knock them down, not the way you might think, but with subtle effects, the same way that people resent some one who is extremely skilled with books & showing it. SOMEONE DOING SOMETHING DIFFERENT, A PARADIGM, IS A THREAT TO TERRITORY. They will unconsciously do things to try to knock them down a level, instead of trying to improve, & that’s what dominance hierarchies are: as results, NOT CLAIMS, it’s just collectivism for feminine social retardation. It’s the same exact thing when whores gossip about a pretty female who has sexual radiance: It’s showing a different way that excludes them. The dominance socialization is masculine imprisonment & undeveloped psychology. Your continuum of masculine strife & no epiphanies is her sustenance.
There are many levels of consciousness. Women retard those levels to only a basic level when men do not deal with them with the proper applicable knowledge.
When you consider the research of Wilhelm Reich, &, yes, no one is perfect, but this man is mostly androcentric, or his results are anyway, his results would put women as a functional utility. I’m more interested with the RESULTS rather than purely the claims.
If you have to be interested with philosophers & scientists without an optimism to small, trivial disagreements, you are seeking a guru rather than using quality logic.
The men of political thought processes who claim that his “sexual freedom” preaching is leftist, like Kinsey, & matriarchal are circumventing their own nature of masculinity, which is an aspect of social constructs – leftism. Wilhelm Reich is not like Kinsey. They’re only similar with very superficial ways. Having hair makes me no more like a woman than a toothbrush.
A man like Reich who has been censored & slandered, which James Demeo has provided with his book: ‘In Defense of Wilhelm Reich: Opposing the 80-Years’ War of Mainstream Defamatory Slander Against One of the 20th Century’s Most Brilliant Physicians & Natural Scientists,’ is someone to be read, like Mark Rudov, Author of ‘Under The Clitoral Hood: How to Crank Her Engine Without Cash, Booze, or Jumper Cables by Mark H. Rudov,’ Esther Vilar, & others. THE MOST IMPORTANT WRITERS ARE THE HATED WRITERS.
Wilhelm Reich’s work is strange & hard.
Unlike writers like Wilhelm Reich, the main function of writers like Jordan Peterson is to keep rightly justified angry males fragmented. Jordan Peterson warns of the “dangers” of helping brothers, for a lack of a better description. How being nice “ruins” lives. You’re making your community less worthy of living with that kind of attitude. Jordan Peterson is a “false flag” to sell “cleaning products.”
REMINDER: Hygiene was not the fundamental reason for circumcision. It was a way of branding males as warriors, which is anti-male, as one would commit plastic surgery for oneself because of not accepting themselves. 
Psychological influences to brand males with a warrior mentality is just one aspect of this body modification, another one, particularly of the J***** religion, is the meaning of circumcision as submission to a powerful male despot – religion of worshiping MINIMIZED alpha-males, & yet people who subscribe to things like alpha male attitudes think they’re being “edgy,” or something like that.  If you really want to have a serious, realistic, objective understanding of who created society, it was beta males, just like Isaac Newton, etc.. What people who subscribe to all this alpha-male nonsense do is they re-appropriate some the superficial definition of order, instead of giving it to the rightful owners, by allowing society to give the credit to types of males who had very little involvement of constructing it compared to the real order creators.
Some males will experience continuing vigilance, will be ready to fight, flee, freeze, or have a mentality of being disconnected. 
The act of violence to male genitals being a cause of clumsy passion to females, & even anti-social tendencies, is not a new idea.
How is the next claim so? Workable, problem solving requires a mentality by masculinity that women are not aroused by. Circumcision makes males subscribe to sportsmen. Females selected sportsmen & the casual, erratic by female sexuality. Therefore, females implemented circumcision, among other things.
It is guarding, need for more intensity with relations (coming to the female level of anti-patience).
Psychological results of circumcision studied have been lacking 
Psychic trauma is programmed when the boy has an aggressive attack to his body.
I’ve typed numerously about this & will repeat it because it is integral: Male aggression is a very poorly understood subject. The male rage after being abused by circumcision then persuades them to join the military, beating someone in a boxing arena, waste hours watching sports, movies. They are being redirected by forces, taking away from masculinity.
The pop. culture joke: “My penis has a mind of its own” also comes from circumcision: When a significant chunk is severed, the covering that should’ve been there is exposing the penis to dry numbness, so sexuality becomes much less cherished afterwards. It’s just another typical “walk to the mall.”
Many males don’t even know why they like certain types of sexuality. It is not their authentic selves.
A “sword with no sheeth has no place to rest.”
Women hate these anti-circumcision articles because it totally destroys they’re little cherished ideas of “alpha men.” They deflect this information because it emphasizes that females are amoral. The info. implies that women enjoy things that are wrong.
Some claim that male rape of females has happened long before genital mutilation. Firstly, while I’m sure that happened, the amount of it is theoretical. Secondly, even so, history reports mostly male figures that are noticeable. History would neglect reporting many other males. Thirdly, men & women were operating, with a less developed language during those times, like wild animals. Males that invented more sophisticated types of language, which stopped a lot of that wild animal behavior that women are fixated to, for socializing are not even seriously attractive to women.
The symptoms of stress are, which is due to the demands of work/whores: changes of appetite, gastrointestinal problems, headaches, impaired concentration, irritability, muscle tension, bad sleep, teeth grinding.
With impaired concentration, etc., the males, taking in all the stress, shows anti-concentration by wasting more money for drinking neurotoxins & taking other poisons, which can ruin adrenocorticotropic hormonal processes. The less of the adrenocorticotropic steroid in the body, the weaker the body’s physical response to stress. 
This all seems very exaggerated, but let me share an anecdote regarding herds, which makes this anecdote scientific because it is equivalent to measuring & applying logic to controlled experiments: When the artists like Nicky Minaj & alternative rock music producers made it popular for neo-normal-idiots to have green-hair, etc., there were hoards of these neo-normal-idiots who then took that trend combined with their introductions with social media: They saw some of these punk-rockers, metal-heads, goths, avant-garde subscribers displayed as profiles. They saw that these guys had something going for themselves – some of them had played concerts in other regions, some of them produced albums, some of them were interviewed by magazines, etc., some of them had gained some amount of popularity, or at least got some amount of recognition by a coterie. What these neo-normal-idiots started doing afterwards, when those scenes were already bad enough, is they started “infiltrating” these scenes & hijacked them. They started to dictate the narrative of what kind of behavior, is allowed. Or, I shouldn’t say behaviour because females are too superficial to even deal with behaviour. Rather: They started to dictate the narrative of what kind of mien & body language is allowed, when these scenes were a lot less concerned with that before the hijacking. For example: When I used to go to many different types of these events, one particular situation being a punk-rock event, there was this anarchist whore portraying her fake image, talking about her pseudo intellectual ideas, she noticed me, because I used to be pretty comparatively contrarian with even those scenes. That’s how these immature events are: It’s all about keeping people guessing & impressed with the next anti-merit flash. I was with an exceptionally pretty female with a really good body. The anarchist whore resented & absolutely hated her because I, even though anarchists are supposed to be about “equality,” had something that looked more extravagant. Whenever whores start “infiltrating” scenes, any of them, they “rape” the scenes by bringing politics & other really stupid contests.
The fundamental problem to this pattern is: These males of those scenes, who are already confused with badly channeled energy, they become frustrated & even more confused because of these patterns. What they do is: they start venting, especially because they haven’t realized an intellectual contest, thanks to whores’ hatred of real intellectual males, & inappropriately abusing other males as a contest: Bickering about really stupid things, like how if you don’t collect vinyl & cassettes, or whatever, or if you don’t waste money for all these mediocre bands & you make time for yourself, then you’re a “poser,” when these males should’ve never been performing for whores firstly. It’s just like how normal people subscribe to politics via the media, distracted with not the total enemy & distracted to not know the actual valid issues.
The males who waste money for these stupid warrior symbols, whether they’re called tattoos or alpha-male posturing, signal to whores: “Look at how much stress I can take to get you’re attention. Look at how much of a fake image I can give.”
Although females also get tattoos, etc., they’re not for those same reasons. They signal, instead: “I want pretense, & I will reward more pretense.”
With the introduction of survival/terror mode, CIRCUMCISION HAS PROGRAMMED MALES THAT SEX IS ROUGH, but with all the pretense, the artificial signs, etc., we can’t realize that well.
False reasons have been invented to replace rituals.
There’s two problems by females:
1.: They’re so addicted to entertainment that the next guy is going to have to compare himself to something more scarce because she has a poor satiation, causing weary masculinity.
2: The scarce dominant males for female craving makes different sorts of unproductive changes. They “manage” things, corruption increases. They take ownership. With the scarce dominant depleting the energy of others because of things like, just one example, pornography, male dopamine, which regulates the release of various hormones & is known to calm the nervous system, involves mood, memory, proper sleep, & mental functions, is altered badly, resulting with, because the correct levels of dopamine is crucial, retarding motivation, enjoyment, & even sexual drive. Afterwards, the male is replacing mental-health with artificial/negative sense of accomplishment, engaging with gambling, which tattoos share the EXACT same mental state of gambling (“I’m doing something stupid for the thrill/I’m wasting my money with poor planning”) smoking, over-eating, etc..  The chemicals of stress, which is really the chemicals of gynocentrism, deregulates our biology, which can cause disease. That’s a fact. These chemicals of gynocentrism is because of the competing psychologies of male & female. It’s a pop. culture idea that men want to compete with other males. We compete with other males because we are not allowed disclosure that competing psychologies of male & female is the true source of this attitude. Women don’t like the freed masculinity. Tell her that you go camping without the dependence of corporations by burying your bowel matter in the woods, or wear pants up to your belly, she will absolutely hate you for doing something different. Most men want to have a good time. When this is thwarted, it causes degenerate versions of good times.
The males might as well be forced because they are so ill-informed because they over-work for slave-wages.
But even more fundamental: The female, with multiple combinations, such as isolating cell-phone culture, internet selling that replaced communities of public domains of walking happily with strangers, etc., the female has acquired even more personality disorders because they’re so accustomed to other males without enough dopamine that those males are lethargic, unfocused, & even depressed, which makes the female similar to that, so then everything is even MORE creepy to her.
Her preferences for comfort is your toll to existing well, & this is why female selection/sexuality for brutal councils is absolutely disgusting, & needs to be only owned by intellectual males – not for her main sexuality.
“As above, so below”: Circumcised men also have much more difficulty gaining good satisfaction – ruined dopamine, so females, also with poor dopamine, because the male is less interested, make interaction & sexuality more rigorous & more naively complicated. It’s only one rough, shoddy sessions sometimes instead of more intently bonded sessions.
You know all of that road-trip, psychedelic experimentation, etc.? That’s all mostly owned by females because of what was previously typed. You know all of those taxing, redundant group business meetings you have to go to during 4 AM that totally “rapes” your need for good sleep. That’s also owned by females.
The gliding in-&-out “communication” of the foreskin with the vagina is diminished.
Women are just good for mostly services. When they are not, you get more & more complications, & not even the good kind like rock-climbing, or something, with gains. You get women cancelling hiring you because one word was misinterpreted by how it was imagined by her rather than the actual content – same thing as “beta” rating.
Nihilism doesn’t promote enough. Discipline encourages self-improvement. I’m presenting real discipline, not like these body modifications pretending to embrace reality. They might have tough skin – the facade, the illusion, front, disguise, veneer, but they have very weak minds.
I don’t know much about Freud because I mostly try to abide by neuroscience & not the psychoanalysis. When Freud talked (among many of his theories) about castration anxiety, the supposed subconscious fear of being castrated by the father for the competition for the mother’s affection, then joining him for practical reasons, was he, firstly, using “father” – dominant – metaphorically, &, secondly, using other codes to try to justify oppressive exploitation of “lower animals” & cruel, unjust authority from the feminine source of a penchant for an assuetude of posterior, unearthly, barely accessible men, incompatible to society, which has created a proclivity of the masses obeying snobbish, haughty trash? I don’t know, that’s why I asked the question.
When vitality is sparsely scattered, the man with rude states has his power only to a superficial state as the cult of “self improvement” – “strength” as the level normalized by gynocentrism. But these men with no significant force are realistically industrialized, irritable, casual, fatigued. A better way I mean is that it is a FAKE vitality or a badly appropriated vitality, & this is the state of alpha males, it’s “bullshit,” as they would say.
Society likes to pretend or ignore, thanks to how men change their behavior for women, that a revenge mentality towards women is “unstable,” yet these hypocritical idiots would be excited for others who have a license to punish.
They say that I “need to get a life,” that the way I present myself is “not interesting,” etc., etc.. I just abide by things as it is, living realistically. I don’t have any ways of hiding behind a pretense, with escapist, cathartic recreations, etc..
There is a local tattoo parlor, not that I intently check – I just happened to notice it, with, I joke you not, the painted words on glass: “NO KNOW-IT-ALLS ALLOWED.” I found this ridiculous because no true intellectuals would seriously waste money for those stupid masochist “warrior” guises anyway. They range with an average of an estimated ~$50.00-~300.00. Intellectuals require economized time, being “too” stable, with precise planning – having more of a life than they will ever have.(I Have a tattoo, but I got it when I was like 14 at a party.)
You’re not a warrior. You sit at home watching television & drink. Even if you do make tours with a band, you’re still not significantly different than a mascot working for a theme-park. Last time I checked when I was typing this, it was 2018. You’re not carrying a spear, etc.. Reminder: by counter-cultures, all you’ve done is just substituted another version of a popularity contest, while producing the fake, unlearned, & instinctive, to replace the ones others participate with. It’s still the same thing though.
The thesaurus gives for subjective:
main definition: adj., emotional; based on inner experience rather than fact.
Then it gives the various synonyms with instinctive as one of them.
Synonyms don’t always have completely & specifically exact same meanings. They have similar meanings, but with certain contexts, they do have the same meanings, & they also give cause & effect abstractions.
With the word: instinctive, & words were invented as tools to describe the external reality – objective, it is known that these counter-cultures & “normies,” while they will even interpret analyzing with a thesaurus to be “irrelevant,” hence my message of them being a burden to the objective, are the same because they live with a minimized schema of reality that is for distraction.
Major taboos remain about male genitals & eroticism, taboos that you must overwhelm to reclaim who & what you really are, & to reclaim your body as a temple – phallic wisdom. Authentic phallic wisdom has been obscured by the dominant culture.
Solution: To the male, & only advice for the male, select for females by the assumption that it will be an affection & sexual transaction. If she does not compute, you already know she will use you only for greedy gains, & most likely has tendencies of almost random replacing, sabotaging you. I’ve learned the most effective way, at least for myself, I don’t necessarily know about you, is being selective of non-masculine females, & especially females much less concerned with popularity.
1: 5 Reasons Why Black Polygamy Is Trending Today – The Pan-African Alliance
2: r/k Selection Theory – ananymousconcervative-dot-com
3: Symbolic Wounds – Puberty Rites & the Envious Male / New, Revised Edition by Bruno Bettelheim, pg. 15
4: Ibid, 34
5: Ibid, 38
6: Ibid, 90-100
7: Ibid, 107-111
8: Autobiography of a Yogi, Paramahansa Yogananda, pg. 149-150
9: ‘PASSPORT JAPAN’ by Dean Engel & Ken Murakami, pg. 22-23]
10: 20/20 BRAIN POWER BY JOSHUA REYNOLDS, pg. 43
11: 20/20 BRAIN POWER BY JOSHUA REYNOLDS, pg. 44
12: Algae: our original omega-3 source – wur-dot-nl
13: 20/20 BRAIN POWER BY JOSHUA REYNOLDS, pg. 44 PG. 44
16: The Skeptical Environmentalist, Bjorn Lomborg, PG. 232
18: Ibid, 236
19: 20/20 Brain Power by Joshua Reynolds, pg. 45
20: Ibid, 47
21: Ibid: 48
22: Enthralled: The Guru Cult of Tibetan Buddhism by Christine A. Chandler
23: we are fighting back – PragerU/info@prageru-dot-com
24: Dairy: 6 Reasons You Should Avoid It At All Costs by Mark Hyman, MD – Huffington post-dot-com
28: The bitter truth about sugar & your health – | CNN – youtube-dot-com
29: Dairy: Is it good or bad for you? Hannah Nichols – medicalnewstoday-dot-com
30: The Okinawa diet – could it help you live to 100? | Michael Booth – theguardian-dot-com
31: 5 Restaurants That Pride Themselves On Being Total D*cks To Their Customers.
32: BLOOD FOR WATER: ANCIENT MAYAN BODY MODIFICATION, Ali Kellog – cvltnation-dot-com
33: Tattoos in Ancient Egypt | Joshua J. Mark – ancient-dot-eu]
34: Polynesian Tattoo: History, Meanings and Traditional Designs | The Polynesian tattoo Handbook – zealandtattoo-dot-co-nz
35: E-Cigs May Contain Chemicals Tied to Lung Disease | Robert Preidt – webmd-dot-com]
36: Symbolic Wounds by Bruno Bettelheim, pg.: 142
37: Ibid, 152
38: Neonatal Circumcision Reconsidered | John Rhinehart – cirp-dot-org
39: The psychological impact of circumcision
R. GOLDMAN – cirp-dot-org
40: GINSENG ENERGY ENHANCER | DORLING KINDERSLEY PUBLISHING, pg. 18
41: Mucuna Pruriens: The Mood-Boosting Productivity Pill You’ve Been Looking for | Emily Mahler – BULLETPROOF-DOT-COM
42: Male circumcision leads to a bad sex life (PDF) |Niels Ebdrup
43: SUBJECTIVE – THESAURUS-DOT-COM