Humans have an astonishing ability to dismiss information that does not conform to their preconceived notions of reality. Scientists, being human, suffer from this mind-set also. Preconceived thoughts are known as accepted paradigms. Those are informational patterns, internally constructed templates, with which externally obtained information is judged. Externally obtained information can come from a news-paper, etc., etc.. But when confronted with ideas & facts that do not conform to an accepted informational paradigm, humans tend to have an intense desire not to believe the new information. Excuses will seem rational: the established paradigm must not be readily evaded for them.
Pretentious & weak minded are trying to make themselves look sophisticated & think that they don’t need to ask questions. Elitist attitudes of a bunch of casual living can be respected by themselves. They can then call others as “beta”, etc., to justify their own casual mentalities. They can pretend to be superior because the public esteems them with authority.
Pain is a warning sign that something is wrong. It is not mean for women to capitalize, as they gossip with other women regarding males, similarly to how kids share trading-card information. “Hardened” psychology isn’t a “badge of honor.” It’s a sign that something has been lost.
Men are expected to just forget about issues quickly so that others can feel less guilty, basically.
If we are to understand what male sensitivity is, we must know that it is one of the states of the core of masculinity: sexuality/affection.
Female objectification/capitalization of masculinity has completely “censored” the reality of male SENSITIVITY.
War & drugs are profoundly intertwined. Amphetamines fueled the activities of soldiers – synthetics & cosmetics to block out the sensitive core of masculinity. If you can’t make the realization of other daily versions of the same thing, you are a dumb-fuck spouting the politics of using “beta male” gas-lighting. Sensitive males simply feel: “I’m going over here instead. You guys can have your little drug-fueled wars.”
Male sensitivity is incredibly boring & disgusting to women, so they feel the need to censor it by altering the influx of sensations.
The only sensible solution is male sensitivity – objectification of females.
This is why females say that nice-guys “aren’t” really nice, they don’t want the censored masculinity to have more power.’
 The journal: Scientific Reports introduced another set of words of what I previously called “using her as a technology” – “interpersonal synchronization.” The body of research states that pain dissipates with affection – objectification by nice-guys.
Nice-guys usually want to evade the pain firstly. Women have a tendency of dolling what they deny to nice-guys. Women like to see what kind of pain the man can experience first – climbing the “bullshit ladder” – before welcoming patriarchal behavior.
I have heard plenty of comments that “the DSM-IV is bullshit.” “Psychology is bullshit.” That’s not a specific claim. There’s more than one branch of psychology. The “virtues” of female sexuality is what’s really bull-shit. The report I cited is neuroscience.
There’s a reason why adopting hatred is valid: You have to study ALL of it. Adopting hatred is learning a different language. Often times, the message is ineffectual without motivation. The enemies speak the language of motivation, they can’t easily sit in a room for long hours studying, so you have to translate.
“Patriarchal” men have the same mentality as this: “You can’t get laid, so you hate everyone.” Whenever I’m confronted with this, I just think, “Oh, ridiculous. You’re one of those idiots.” Welcoming the “patriarchy” is female rights. They secure women from violence, etc., yet they condone male-on-male violence.
Control of diet, castrating males, corralling males into constricted spaces, wild animals have been used as cattle – similar thing.
The west Indian slaves were fed salted foods because hotter regions causes more depletion by sweating.
The Masai of East Africa renew salt by drinking blood of the animals they own. 
Many theories of psychology are commensensical: The Freudian idea of unconscious motivation, the Behavioristic idea of reward & punishment governing behavior, & others.
We should add much, much, more things:
I’ll type what I mean: I was asked by another: “So what type of girls are you involved with – like, Vice-reading ones?”
Not at all. Vice has horrible priorities.
[7:] They did an article: ‘We Know Female Genital Mutilation Has Been Happening in the US. How Do We Stop It?’
Even though I hate most women, I would never condone FGM. But that’s not the main axiom I have. Obviously, if this was regarding the male version of this, people would laugh, & this is why I especially think it’s important to use hatred – to stop laughter, etc., & because it’s not obvious to them.
FGM (female genital mutilation) was criminalized during 1996. Why not MGM?
There even willing to admit: FGM causes complications, anxiety, PTSD, & depression commonly. Why do they completely reject the facts that MGM does the same?
The end of the article states, posing as “neutral/fair”: An earlier version overstates prevalence of arguments for medicalized version of FGM. They’re just equivocating the filibuster. They’ll have another article next time regarding “how smoking weed & playing virtual reality helps with lucid dreaming,” or something.
: Presidential candidate Andrew Yang said he’s interested for intactivism, then retracted due to politics.
1: War & drugs: Together since forever | Eric Mankin – knowablemagazine-dot-org
2: When Lovers Touch, Their breathing & Heartbeat Syncs While Pain Wanes – neurosciencenews-dot-com
3: Salt – Mark Kurlanksy, pg. 11
5: ibid, pg. 9
6: A Mind So Rare | Merlin Donald, pg, xii
7: We Know Female Genital Mutilation Has Been Happening in the US. How Do We Stop It? – Suman Naishadham | vice-dot-com
 Presidential Candidate Andrew Yang Confirms He Has Seen Amreican Circumcision Documentary | Andrew Amberg – pressepuce-dot-com